Suppr超能文献

促进母乳喂养启动、持续时间和纯母乳喂养的干预措施的结局指标:一项系统评价

Outcome Measures in Interventions That Enhance Breastfeeding Initiation, Duration, and Exclusivity: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Wood Natsuko K, Woods Nancy F

机构信息

Natsuko K. Wood is an Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, WA. The author can be reached via e-mail at

出版信息

MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2018 Nov/Dec;43(6):341-347. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000472.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to examine outcome measures used in interventions focusing on enhancement of breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity.

METHODS

A literature search guided by search terms on outcome measures of breastfeeding interventions was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL Plus, & PsycINFO databases on publications between 2006 and 2017.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in this review, using PRISMA guidelines. Rates of breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity were measured during specific points in time. Data collection methods involve interviews, self-report, observations, and/or feeding logs. Although breastfeeding types (exclusive breastfeeding, predominant breastfeeding, and complementary breastfeeding) were measured, methods of infant feeding (breastfeeding and bottle feeding) were rarely assessed, ignoring significant mediators or moderators of breastfeeding.

CONCLUSIONS

There were methodological limitations to the reviewed studies: (1) a 24-hour recall bias, (2) misclassification of breastfeeding categories, (3) lack of consistency in breastfeeding definitions, and (4) few reports of the reason for breastfeeding discontinuation. Future studies should focus on the modifiable cause of the problem: outcome measures attributed to the targets of the intervention, followed by breastfeeding initiation, duration, and/or exclusivity.

摘要

目的

本综述的目的是研究在旨在提高母乳喂养开始率、持续时间和纯母乳喂养率的干预措施中所使用的结局指标。

方法

在2006年至2017年期间发表的文献中,利用PubMed、CINAHL Plus和PsycINFO数据库,以母乳喂养干预措施的结局指标搜索词为导向进行文献检索。

结果

本综述采用PRISMA指南纳入了9项研究。在特定时间点测量母乳喂养的开始率、持续时间和纯母乳喂养率。数据收集方法包括访谈、自我报告、观察和/或喂养记录。虽然对母乳喂养类型(纯母乳喂养、主要母乳喂养和补充母乳喂养)进行了测量,但很少评估婴儿喂养方式(母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养),忽略了母乳喂养的重要调节因素或中介因素。

结论

所综述的研究存在方法学局限性:(1)24小时回忆偏差;(2)母乳喂养类别分类错误;(3)母乳喂养定义缺乏一致性;(4)关于母乳喂养中断原因的报告很少。未来的研究应关注该问题的可改变原因:归因于干预目标的结局指标,其次是母乳喂养的开始、持续时间和/或纯母乳喂养率。

相似文献

5
Systematic Review of Evidence for Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Step 3.爱婴医院倡议步骤3的证据系统评价
J Hum Lact. 2017 Feb;33(1):50-82. doi: 10.1177/0890334416679618. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
6
9
Integrative Review of Interventions to Promote Breastfeeding in the Late Preterm Infant.促进晚期早产儿母乳喂养干预措施的综合综述
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017 May-Jun;46(3):347-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

6
Exclusive breastfeeding increased by an internet intervention.通过网络干预增加纯母乳喂养率。
Breastfeed Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;10(1):20-5. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0093. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
8
Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding.纯母乳喂养的最佳时长。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD003517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003517.pub2.
10
Breastfeeding and the use of human milk.母乳喂养与人类乳汁使用。
Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):e827-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3552. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验