Wood Natsuko K, Woods Nancy F
Natsuko K. Wood is an Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, WA. The author can be reached via e-mail at
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2018 Nov/Dec;43(6):341-347. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000472.
The purpose of this review was to examine outcome measures used in interventions focusing on enhancement of breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity.
A literature search guided by search terms on outcome measures of breastfeeding interventions was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL Plus, & PsycINFO databases on publications between 2006 and 2017.
Nine studies were included in this review, using PRISMA guidelines. Rates of breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity were measured during specific points in time. Data collection methods involve interviews, self-report, observations, and/or feeding logs. Although breastfeeding types (exclusive breastfeeding, predominant breastfeeding, and complementary breastfeeding) were measured, methods of infant feeding (breastfeeding and bottle feeding) were rarely assessed, ignoring significant mediators or moderators of breastfeeding.
There were methodological limitations to the reviewed studies: (1) a 24-hour recall bias, (2) misclassification of breastfeeding categories, (3) lack of consistency in breastfeeding definitions, and (4) few reports of the reason for breastfeeding discontinuation. Future studies should focus on the modifiable cause of the problem: outcome measures attributed to the targets of the intervention, followed by breastfeeding initiation, duration, and/or exclusivity.
本综述的目的是研究在旨在提高母乳喂养开始率、持续时间和纯母乳喂养率的干预措施中所使用的结局指标。
在2006年至2017年期间发表的文献中,利用PubMed、CINAHL Plus和PsycINFO数据库,以母乳喂养干预措施的结局指标搜索词为导向进行文献检索。
本综述采用PRISMA指南纳入了9项研究。在特定时间点测量母乳喂养的开始率、持续时间和纯母乳喂养率。数据收集方法包括访谈、自我报告、观察和/或喂养记录。虽然对母乳喂养类型(纯母乳喂养、主要母乳喂养和补充母乳喂养)进行了测量,但很少评估婴儿喂养方式(母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养),忽略了母乳喂养的重要调节因素或中介因素。
所综述的研究存在方法学局限性:(1)24小时回忆偏差;(2)母乳喂养类别分类错误;(3)母乳喂养定义缺乏一致性;(4)关于母乳喂养中断原因的报告很少。未来的研究应关注该问题的可改变原因:归因于干预目标的结局指标,其次是母乳喂养的开始、持续时间和/或纯母乳喂养率。