Wong Ka Lun, Tarrant Marie, Lok Kris Yuet Wan
School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
J Hum Lact. 2015 Aug;31(3):354-66. doi: 10.1177/0890334415583294. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
Although breastfeeding initiation rates have increased substantially in many developed countries over the past several decades, breastfeeding duration and exclusivity remain suboptimal. In the antenatal period, both group and individual education interventions have been implemented to improve breastfeeding. The purpose of this review was to compare the effectiveness of group and individual antenatal professional education on breastfeeding exclusivity and duration. A systematic search of the literature was conducted using Medline (1946-June 2014), PubMed (1883-June 2014), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1947-June 2014), EMBASE (1947-June 2014), British Nursing Index (1994-June 2014), Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library. Included studies were limited to health care professional-conducted education delivered to pregnant women only. Only studies reporting breastfeeding duration or exclusivity were included. Nineteen studies were included, of which 13 evaluated antenatal group education, 5 evaluated individual antenatal education, and 1 evaluated both a group and an individual antenatal education. When compared with standard care, 4 out of 12 studies supported the effectiveness of antenatal group education on breastfeeding duration or exclusivity, whereas 4 out of 6 studies supported the effectiveness of antenatal individual education. Two studies compared antenatal group education with peer-led education and neither study showed a significant difference in breastfeeding outcomes. The methodological heterogeneity and the small number of high quality studies limited our ability to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of either mode of antenatal education.
尽管在过去几十年里,许多发达国家的母乳喂养启动率大幅提高,但母乳喂养的持续时间和纯母乳喂养率仍不尽人意。在产前阶段,已实施了集体和个别教育干预措施以促进母乳喂养。本综述的目的是比较产前集体专业教育和个别专业教育对纯母乳喂养持续时间和时长的效果。我们使用Medline(1946年 - 2014年6月)、PubMed(1883年 - 2014年6月)、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(1947年 - 2014年6月)、EMBASE(1947年 - 2014年6月)、英国护理索引(1994年 - 2014年6月)、谷歌学术和考科蓝图书馆对文献进行了系统检索。纳入的研究仅限于由医疗保健专业人员仅针对孕妇开展的教育。仅纳入报告了母乳喂养持续时间或纯母乳喂养情况的研究。共纳入19项研究,其中13项评估了产前集体教育,5项评估了产前个别教育,1项同时评估了产前集体教育和个别教育。与标准护理相比,12项研究中有4项支持产前集体教育对母乳喂养持续时间或纯母乳喂养的有效性,而6项研究中有4项支持产前个别教育的有效性。两项研究将产前集体教育与同伴主导的教育进行了比较,两项研究均未显示母乳喂养结果有显著差异。方法学上的异质性以及高质量研究数量较少,限制了我们就任何一种产前教育模式的有效性得出确凿结论的能力。