Suppr超能文献

系统比较公共通信中关于自杀安全信息传递的建议。

Systematic comparison of recommendations for safe messaging about suicide in public communications.

机构信息

Psychology Department and Centre for Research and Intervention on Suicide, Ethical Issues and End of Life Practices, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P.8888, Succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, QC H3C 3P8 Canada.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 1;244:124-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.031. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diversity of guidelines for safe public messaging about suicide and the heterogeneous scientific research on the topic warrants comparisons of guidelines and analysis of the relevance of research findings to determine best practices.

METHODS

We searched databases and websites for organizations' guidelines concerning safe public messaging on suicide, and relevant research articles.

RESULTS

We identified 24 public messaging guidelines, 11 terminology guidelines and 44 research papers. No recommendations were in all guidelines, with more agreement on what not to do than on what to do. Recommendations in over half of guidelines are: avoid glorifying suicide, do not describe suicide methods, don't say suicide in inexplicable or explain simplistically, do not state that suicide is frequent in specific circumstances, encourage help seeking. There were disagreements on including personal details about people who died by suicide, and agreement to avoid: "committed suicide," "completed suicide," "successful suicide," "failed suicide/attempt" "unsuccessful suicide/attempt". Only "died by suicide" was recommended by a majority. Some recommended and some said to avoid: "Suicide attempt," "attempt to end his life," "attempted suicide," "non-fatal attempt at suicide," "unintentional (death)," "intentional self-harm," "suicidal ideation," "completed suicide," "survivor," "suicide loss survivor." Research papers had a wide range of objectives, methodologies, media studied and target populations. None provided empirical data that could help support or refute any recommendations.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of justifications for guidelines and scarce relevant research makes validation of recommendations challenging.

CONCLUSIONS

Research is needed to validate recommendations and terminology and develop consensus on guidelines for public messages, and determine if media guidelines for reporting on suicide are relevant for public messaging who's goal is to inform and educate rather than report news.

摘要

背景

有关自杀的安全公共信息传递的指南存在多样性,且该主题的科学研究也存在异质性,因此有必要对这些指南进行比较,并分析研究结果的相关性,以确定最佳实践。

方法

我们搜索了数据库和网站上有关组织关于自杀安全公共信息传递的指南以及相关研究文章。

结果

我们确定了 24 条公共信息传递指南、11 条术语指南和 44 篇研究论文。没有一条建议在所有指南中都得到了采纳,不做什么的共识多于做什么的共识。超过一半的指南建议:避免美化自杀,不要描述自杀方法,不要莫名其妙地或简单地解释自杀,不要声称自杀在特定情况下很常见,鼓励寻求帮助。对于包括自杀者的个人细节,以及避免使用“自杀”、“自杀完成”、“自杀成功”、“自杀失败/企图”、“自杀失败/企图”等术语,指南存在分歧。只有“自杀”被大多数指南推荐。有些指南建议避免使用“自杀企图”、“试图结束自己的生命”、“自杀企图”、“非致命自杀企图”、“非故意(死亡)”、“故意自残”、“自杀意念”、“自杀完成”、“幸存者”、“自杀死亡幸存者”等术语,而有些则表示可以使用。研究论文的目标、方法、研究的媒体和目标人群各不相同。没有一篇论文提供了可以帮助支持或反驳任何建议的实证数据。

局限性

缺乏对指南的论证和相关研究的缺乏使得验证建议变得具有挑战性。

结论

需要开展研究来验证建议和术语,并就公共信息传递的指南达成共识,确定媒体对自杀事件的报道指南是否与旨在提供信息和教育而不是报道新闻的公共信息传递相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验