Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Mar;9(2):102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
There is an increasing effort to allow patients open access to their physician notes through electronic medical record portals. However, limited data exist on the impact of such access on oncology patients, and concerns remain regarding potential harms. Therefore, we determined the baseline perceptions and impact of open access to oncology notes on radiation oncology patients.
Patients receiving radiation therapy were provided instructional materials on accessing oncology notes at the time of their initial evaluation. Patients were prospectively surveyed to evaluate baseline interest and expectations before access and to determine the actual usage and impact at the end of their radiation treatment course.
A total of 220 patients were surveyed; 136 (62%) completed the baseline survey, of which 88 (40%) completed the final survey. The majority of participants were age >60 years (n = 83; 61%), and 70 were male (51%). Before accessing the notes, the majority of patients agreed that open access to oncology notes would improve understanding of diagnosis (99%), understanding of treatment side effects (98%), reassurance about treatment goals (96%), and communication with family (99%). All patients who accessed the notes found them to be useful. After accessing the notes, approximately 96%, 94%, and 96% of patients reported an improved understanding of their diagnosis, an improved understanding of treatment side effects, and feeling more reassured about their treatment, respectively. Approximately 11%, 6%, and 4% of patients noted increased worry, increased confusion, and finding information they now regret reading, respectively. Patient age, sex, and specific cancer diagnoses were not predictive of experiencing negative effects from accessing the notes.
Radiation oncology patients have a strong interest in open access to their physician notes, and the majority of patients expect and actually report meaningful benefits. These data support strategies to allow more patients with cancer access to their physicians' notes.
越来越多的人努力通过电子病历门户让患者可以公开访问其医生的笔记。然而,关于这种访问对肿瘤患者的影响的数据有限,人们仍然对潜在的危害感到担忧。因此,我们确定了开放获取肿瘤学笔记对肿瘤患者的放射肿瘤学患者的基线认知和影响。
在患者首次评估时,为接受放射治疗的患者提供了有关访问肿瘤学笔记的教学材料。前瞻性调查患者,在获得访问权限之前评估其兴趣和期望,并在放射治疗结束时确定实际使用情况和影响。
共调查了 220 名患者;136 名(62%)完成了基线调查,其中 88 名(40%)完成了最终调查。大多数参与者年龄>60 岁(n=83;61%),70 名男性(51%)。在访问笔记之前,大多数患者同意开放获取肿瘤学笔记将有助于他们更好地理解诊断(99%)、治疗副作用(98%)、对治疗目标感到放心(96%)以及与家人沟通(99%)。所有访问过笔记的患者都发现它们很有用。访问笔记后,大约 96%、94%和 96%的患者分别报告说,他们对自己的诊断、治疗副作用的理解有了更好的理解,对治疗更有信心。大约 11%、6%和 4%的患者分别注意到增加了担忧、增加了困惑和发现了他们现在后悔阅读的信息。患者年龄、性别和特定癌症诊断与访问笔记产生负面影响无关。
放射肿瘤学患者对开放获取其医生笔记有强烈的兴趣,大多数患者期望并实际报告了有意义的好处。这些数据支持允许更多癌症患者访问医生笔记的策略。