• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于工作场所的团体培训计划结合经济激励对戒烟效果的影响:一项集群随机对照试验。

Effect of a workplace-based group training programme combined with financial incentives on smoking cessation: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; IVO Addiction Research Institute, The Hague, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2018 Nov;3(11):e536-e544. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30185-3. Epub 2018 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30185-3
PMID:30342875
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Financial incentives are potentially useful tools to aid smoking cessation, but robust evidence to support their efficacy, particularly in combination with other interventions (eg, group counselling), has not been reported. We aimed to investigate whether financial incentives combined with a smoking cessation group training programme (compared with a training programme with no incentives) organised at the workplace would increase 12-month abstinence rates in tobacco-smoking employees with different education and income levels.

METHODS

This cluster-randomised controlled trial was done in the Netherlands with companies that offer a smoking cessation group training programme to all of their smoking employees. Eligible participants were tobacco-smoking employees and spouses of employees who were at least 18 years of age. Participants in the control group received a weekly 90-min session of smoking cessation group training for 7 weeks at the workplace; in addition to the group training, participants in the intervention group received vouchers for being abstinent (€50 at the end of the training programme, €50 3 months after completion of the programme, €50 after 6 months, and €200 after 12 months). Companies were randomly assigned by an independent research assistant to the intervention group or the control group with a digital randomisation programme, using a biased urn method. The primary outcome was carbon monoxide-validated continuous abstinence at 12 months. All randomised participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat analyses, with the exception of unavoidable loss (participants who had died or moved to an untraceable address (according to the Russell Standard), and in the sensitivity analyses, except the complete case analysis, which included only participants for whom all variables included in the model were not missing. This study is registered with the Dutch Trial Register, number NTR5657.

FINDINGS

Between March 1, 2016, and March 1, 2017, 61 companies with 604 participating smokers were enrolled. 31 companies (319 smokers) were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 30 companies (285 smokers) to the control group. 12 months after finishing the smoking cessation programme, the proportion of individuals abstaining from smoking in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (131 [41%] of 319 vs 75 [26%] of 284; adjusted odds ratio 1·93, 95% CI 1·31-2·85, p=0·0009; adjusted for education level, income level, and Fagerström score).

INTERPRETATION

Financial incentives in addition to a smoking cessation group training programme can significantly increase long-term smoking abstinence. The results of the current study could motivate employers to facilitate a workplace smoking cessation programme with financial incentives to help employees to quit smoking.

FUNDING

Dutch Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

经济激励措施可能是帮助戒烟的有效工具,但尚未有强有力的证据支持其疗效,尤其是在与其他干预措施(如团体咨询)结合使用时。我们旨在研究在工作场所组织的经济激励措施与戒烟团体培训计划(与没有激励措施的培训计划相比)相结合是否会提高不同教育和收入水平的吸烟员工的 12 个月戒烟率。

方法

这是一项在荷兰进行的群组随机对照试验,涉及为所有吸烟员工提供戒烟团体培训计划的公司。合格参与者为年龄至少 18 岁的吸烟员工和员工的配偶。对照组的参与者在工作场所接受每周 90 分钟的戒烟团体培训 7 周;除了团体培训外,干预组的参与者在戒烟时获得代金券(培训计划结束时 50 欧元,计划完成后 3 个月 50 欧元,6 个月后 50 欧元,12 个月后 200 欧元)。采用偏倚 urn 方法,由独立研究助理使用数字随机化程序将公司随机分配到干预组或对照组。主要结局为 12 个月时经一氧化碳验证的持续戒烟。除不可避免的损失外(已死亡或搬到无法追踪地址的参与者(根据 Russell 标准),以及在敏感性分析中,除完全案例分析外,所有随机参与者均包括在修改后的意向治疗分析中,完全案例分析仅包括所有纳入模型的变量均未缺失的参与者。这项研究在荷兰试验登记处注册,编号为 NTR5657。

发现

2016 年 3 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 1 日,共有 61 家公司的 604 名参与吸烟者被纳入研究。31 家公司(319 名吸烟者)被随机分配到干预组,30 家公司(285 名吸烟者)被随机分配到对照组。戒烟计划完成 12 个月后,干预组中戒烟的个体比例明显高于对照组(319 人中 131 人[41%]与 284 人中 75 人[26%];调整后的优势比 1.93,95%CI 1.31-2.85,p=0.0009;调整了教育水平、收入水平和 Fagerström 评分)。

解释

除了戒烟团体培训计划外,经济激励措施还可以显著提高长期戒烟率。目前的研究结果可能会促使雇主为员工提供有经济激励的工作场所戒烟计划,以帮助他们戒烟。

资金

荷兰癌症协会。

相似文献

1
Effect of a workplace-based group training programme combined with financial incentives on smoking cessation: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.基于工作场所的团体培训计划结合经济激励对戒烟效果的影响:一项集群随机对照试验。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Nov;3(11):e536-e544. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30185-3. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
2
'Secretly, it's a competition': a qualitative study investigating what helped employees quit smoking during a workplace smoking cessation group training programme with incentives.“暗地里,这是一场竞赛”:一项定性研究,旨在调查在提供激励的工作场所戒烟小组培训计划中,是什么帮助员工戒烟。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e023917. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023917.
3
The effect of financial incentives on top of behavioral support on quit rates in tobacco smoking employees: study protocol of a cluster-randomized trial.经济激励叠加行为支持对吸烟员工戒烟率的影响:一项整群随机试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):1056. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3729-y.
4
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a work-place smoking cessation intervention with and without financial incentives.工作场所戒烟干预措施的成本效益和成本效用分析,有无财务激励措施。
Addiction. 2020 Mar;115(3):534-545. doi: 10.1111/add.14861. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
5
PERSonalised Incentives for Supporting Tobacco cessation (PERSIST) among healthcare employees: a randomised controlled trial protocol.针对医护人员的个性化戒烟激励(PERSIST):一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e037799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037799.
6
Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: randomised controlled trial.孕期戒烟的经济激励措施:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 27;350:h134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h134.
7
Effects of Large Financial Incentives for Long-Term Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Trial.长期戒烟的大额经济激励效果:一项随机试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 23;68(8):777-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.066.
8
How Financial Incentives Increase Smoking Cessation: A Two-Level Path Analysis.经济激励措施如何增加戒烟率:一个双重路径分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):99-106. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa024.
9
Smoking cessation in workplace settings: quit rates and determinants in a group behaviour therapy programme.工作场所的戒烟:团体行为治疗项目中的戒烟率及影响因素
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Sep 13;147:w14500. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14500. eCollection 2017.
10
Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: multicentre randomised controlled trial.孕期戒烟的经济激励措施:多中心随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2021 Dec 1;375:e065217. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-065217.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a training for managers in using active and personal communication to stimulate employee participation in a workplace smoking cessation program.评估一项针对管理人员开展的培训,该培训内容为运用积极且个性化的沟通方式来促进员工参与职场戒烟项目。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2025 Aug 29;11. doi: 10.18332/tpc/208807. eCollection 2025.
2
Financial incentives for substance abstinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.物质戒断的经济激励措施:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf038.
3
Differences in the effectiveness of individual-level smoking cessation interventions by socioeconomic status.
个体层面戒烟干预措施的有效性在社会经济地位方面的差异。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD015120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015120.pub2.
4
Incentives for smoking cessation.戒烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 13;1(1):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub7.
5
Evaluating the Impact of a Game (Inner Dragon) on User Engagement Within a Leading Smartphone App for Smoking Cessation: Randomized Controlled Trial.评估一款游戏(Inner Dragon)对一款领先的智能手机戒烟应用程序用户参与度的影响:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 30;26:e57839. doi: 10.2196/57839.
6
Financial incentive interventions for smoking cessation among Chinese smokers: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.财务激励干预措施对中国烟民戒烟的影响:一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 29;14(4):e080344. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080344.
7
Process and effect evaluation of a referral aid for smoking cessation counselling in primary care: Findings of a randomized controlled trial.基层医疗中戒烟咨询转诊辅助工具的过程与效果评估:一项随机对照试验的结果
Tob Prev Cessat. 2024 Jan 10;10. doi: 10.18332/tpc/176148. eCollection 2024.
8
Effects of a supportive workplace environment on the success rate for smoking cessation camp.支持性工作场所环境对戒烟营成功率的影响。
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2023 Nov 22;35:e48. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2023.35.e48. eCollection 2023.
9
Methylphenidate as a treatment option for substance use disorder: a transdiagnostic perspective.哌甲酯作为物质使用障碍的一种治疗选择:一种跨诊断视角
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 3;14:1208120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1208120. eCollection 2023.
10
Interactive assistance via eHealth for small- and medium-sized enterprises' employer and health care manager teams on tobacco control (eSMART-TC): protocol for a cluster randomized hybrid type II trial (N-EQUITY2101/J-SUPPORT2102).通过电子健康为中小企业雇主和医疗保健管理人员团队提供烟草控制方面的互动式协助(eSMART-TC):一项整群随机II型混合试验的方案(N-EQUITY2101/J-SUPPORT2102)
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jun 7;4(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00444-0.