Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.082. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
In total hip arthroplasty, the minimum host bone coverage required on the cup for stable fixation has been previously reported; however, the coverage was generally evaluated on a 2-dimensional (2D) image and 3-dimensional (3D) coverage has not been well described.
We used postoperative computed tomography images to retrospectively measure 3D cup coverage in 151 hips with developmental dysplasia of the hip that underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. The aims were to (1) determine the minimum requirement of the 3D coverage for stable cup fixation; (2) evaluate the relationship between 2D and 3D coverage; and (3) identify the factors associated with 2D-3D discrepancy, defined as follows: 2D-3D discrepancy = 2D coverage-3D coverage.
All cups showed stable fixation as demonstrated by bone ingrowth with an average postoperative period of 48 months. The minimum 3D coverage was 61.2%, with a mean value of 77.1% ± 6.7% and maximum value of 97.6%. We found a significant positive but poor relationship between 3D and 2D coverage (bone coverage index; r = 0.30). Consequently, the 2D-3D discrepancy varied greatly, with a mean value of -1.6% ± 12.3% (range, -36.5% to 32.2%). Multiple linear regression analyses confirmed that lower cup center and anterior tilt of the pelvis relative to the computed tomography table were independent factors associated with increasing 2D-3D discrepancy.
This study showed that 2D coverage, measured on a projected image, carries a risk of overestimation, especially in hips with the aforementioned features.
在全髋关节置换术中,先前已有研究报道了髋臼杯为实现稳定固定所需的最小宿主骨覆盖范围;然而,该覆盖范围通常是在二维(2D)图像上进行评估,而三维(3D)覆盖范围尚未得到很好的描述。
我们使用术后计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,回顾性地测量了 151 例髋关节发育不良行初次全髋关节置换术患者的 3D 髋臼杯覆盖范围。目的是:(1)确定稳定杯固定所需的 3D 覆盖范围的最低要求;(2)评估 2D 和 3D 覆盖范围之间的关系;(3)确定与 2D-3D 差异相关的因素,定义如下:2D-3D 差异=2D 覆盖范围-3D 覆盖范围。
所有髋臼杯均显示出稳定的固定,表现为骨长入,术后平均随访时间为 48 个月。最小 3D 覆盖范围为 61.2%,平均为 77.1%±6.7%,最大为 97.6%。我们发现 3D 和 2D 覆盖范围之间存在显著的正相关关系,但相关性较差(骨覆盖指数;r=0.30)。因此,2D-3D 差异变化较大,平均为-1.6%±12.3%(范围为-36.5%至 32.2%)。多元线性回归分析证实,髋臼杯中心位置较低和骨盆相对于 CT 床的前倾角是与 2D-3D 差异增大相关的独立因素。
本研究表明,在投影图像上测量的 2D 覆盖范围存在高估的风险,尤其是在具有上述特征的髋关节中。