• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节手术中使用骨盆定位器导致压疮的危险因素:一项对229例患者的回顾性观察队列研究

Risk factors for pressure ulcers from the use of a pelvic positioner in hip surgery: a retrospective observational cohort study in 229 patients.

作者信息

Ueno Takuro, Kabata Tamon, Kajino Yoshitomo, Inoue Daisuke, Ohmori Takaaki, Yoshitani Junya, Ueoka Ken, Yamamuro Yuki, Tsuchiya Hiroyuki

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641 Japan.

出版信息

Patient Saf Surg. 2020 Apr 7;14:10. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00237-7. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s13037-020-00237-7
PMID:32280374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7137331/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers are serious postsurgical complications requiring additional treatment, reoperation, and extended hospitalization. No study has investigated the frequency of the ulcers caused by compression with a pelvic positioner, which is used in hip surgeries to stabilize patients in the lateral decubitus position.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated the risk factors and the frequency of the ulcers caused by the use of pelvic positioners in hip surgeries. The records of patients who underwent surgical procedures under general anesthesia at our institution between January 1, 2016 and March 31, 2018 were reviewed. The inclusion criterion for the assessment of risk factors was hip surgery in the lateral decubitus position stabilized by a pelvic positioner. The exclusion criteria were patients with trauma, missing data, or a pre-existing pressure ulcer. Finally,.the study included 229 patients (265 hip surgeries). All the patients were positioned in the lateral decubitus position with the assistance of either a pelvic positioner, which had a single support fixture located over the pubic symphysis or a double support fixture located over the bilateral anterior superior iliac spine. Intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers were diagnosed when ulcers were absent on admission and the redness that was observed immediately after surgery remained after 24 h. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with an increased risk for ulcers.

RESULTS

Ulcers developed in 8 of 1810 (0.44%) patients who underwent orthopedic surgery. Seven of the 265 (2.64%) patients who underwent hip surgery in the lateral decubitus position stabilized by a pelvic positioner developed ulcers. All ulcers were located on areas of the body that were compressed by the pelvic positioner. After identifying controls for patient height (less than 154 cm), surgery duration (longer than 180 min), blood loss (more than 355 ml), and type of pelvic positioner used, we identified the independent risk factors for ulcers to be patient height < 154 cm (adjusted odds ratio, 12.8; -value, 0.032) and the use of pelvic positioners with pubic bone support (adjusted odds ratio, 10.53; p-value, 0.047).

CONCLUSION

The use of pelvic positioners with pubic bone support should be avoided in patients with a height of < 154 cm to decrease the risk of ulcers.

摘要

背景

术中获得性压疮是严重的术后并发症,需要额外治疗、再次手术并延长住院时间。尚无研究调查在髋关节手术中用于将患者稳定在侧卧位的骨盆定位器压迫所致压疮的发生率。

方法

这项回顾性研究调查了髋关节手术中使用骨盆定位器所致压疮的危险因素及发生率。回顾了2016年1月1日至2018年3月31日在我院接受全身麻醉手术患者的记录。评估危险因素的纳入标准是采用骨盆定位器稳定在侧卧位的髋关节手术。排除标准为有创伤、数据缺失或术前已有压疮的患者。最终,该研究纳入了229例患者(265例髋关节手术)。所有患者均在骨盆定位器的辅助下处于侧卧位,该定位器要么在耻骨联合上方有一个单一支撑装置,要么在双侧髂前上棘上方有一个双支撑装置。当入院时无溃疡且术后立即观察到的发红在24小时后仍存在时,诊断为术中获得性压疮。采用多因素分析确定与压疮风险增加相关的因素。

结果

在1810例接受骨科手术的患者中,有8例(0.44%)发生了压疮。在265例采用骨盆定位器稳定在侧卧位进行髋关节手术的患者中,有7例(2.64%)发生了压疮。所有压疮均位于被骨盆定位器压迫的身体部位。在确定了患者身高(小于154cm)、手术时间(超过180分钟)、失血量(超过355ml)和所用骨盆定位器类型的对照因素后,我们确定压疮的独立危险因素为患者身高<154cm(调整优势比,12.8;P值,0.032)以及使用带有耻骨支撑的骨盆定位器(调整优势比,10.53;P值,0.047)。

结论

对于身高<154cm的患者,应避免使用带有耻骨支撑的骨盆定位器,以降低压疮风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/7137331/32f23176e874/13037_2020_237_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/7137331/bf57c460f700/13037_2020_237_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/7137331/32f23176e874/13037_2020_237_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/7137331/bf57c460f700/13037_2020_237_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/7137331/32f23176e874/13037_2020_237_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for pressure ulcers from the use of a pelvic positioner in hip surgery: a retrospective observational cohort study in 229 patients.髋关节手术中使用骨盆定位器导致压疮的危险因素:一项对229例患者的回顾性观察队列研究
Patient Saf Surg. 2020 Apr 7;14:10. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00237-7. eCollection 2020.
2
Pelvic stability during simulated total hip arthroplasty motions: Comparing different hip positioners.模拟全髋关节置换手术动作时的骨盆稳定性:比较不同的髋关节定位器。
J Orthop. 2022 Sep 29;34:398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.08.004. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
3
The comparison of fluidized positioners and traditional gel pads for skin protection in neurosurgical patients undergoing lateral and prone positions: A retrospective analysis with propensity score matching method.在接受侧卧位和俯卧位的神经外科患者中,比较流化定位器和传统凝胶垫在皮肤保护方面的效果:一项倾向评分匹配法的回顾性分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Feb;21(2):e14662. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14662.
4
Efficacy of the Anatomical-Pelvic-Plane Positioner in Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Lateral Decubitus Position.解剖学骨盆平面定位器在侧卧位全髋关节置换术中的疗效
J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1520-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.048. Epub 2016 Dec 11.
5
Rigid Patient Positioning is Unreliable in Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中刚性患者体位固定不可靠。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1890-1893. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.038. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
6
Pelvic positioning in the supine position leads to more consistent orientation of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty.仰卧位时骨盆的定位可使全髋关节置换术后髋臼假体的方向更一致。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Oct;100-B(10):1280-1288. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B10.BJJ-2018-0134.R1.
7
Changes in acetabular orientation during total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中髋臼方位的变化。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6_Supple_B):45-50. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1335.R1.
8
Face tissue pressure in prone positioning: a comparison of three face pillows while in the prone position for spinal surgery.俯卧位时面部组织压力:脊柱手术俯卧位时三种面部枕头的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 15;33(26):2938-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818b9029.
9
[Minimally invasive small incision direct anterior total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position: complications and early outcome].侧卧位微创小切口直接前路全髋关节置换术:并发症及早期疗效
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 5;98(21):1679-1685. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.21.012.
10
Risk factors for femoral fracture in lateral decubitus direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty using conventional stems: a retrospective analysis.外侧卧位直接前方入路全髋关节置换术使用传统柄的股骨骨折的危险因素:回顾性分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 30;16(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02253-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Nomogram for intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries in children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a retrospective study.体外循环心脏手术患儿术中获得性压力性损伤的列线图:一项回顾性研究
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04989-4.
2
Patient positioning on the operating table and patient safety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.手术台上的患者体位与患者安全:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Sep;81(9):5585-5602. doi: 10.1111/jan.16049. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
3
Quantifying anterior pelvic roll during total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position.

本文引用的文献

1
High body mass index is a strong predictor of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in spinal surgery patients when prophylactic film dressings are applied: A retrospective analysis prior to the BOSS Trial.高身体质量指数是脊柱手术患者术中获得性压力性损伤的强烈预测因子,当预防性贴膜敷料应用时:BOSS 试验前的回顾性分析。
Int Wound J. 2020 Jun;17(3):660-669. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13287. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Incidence and risk factors for medical device-related pressure ulcers: The first report in this regard in Iran.医疗器械相关性压力性溃疡的发生率和危险因素:伊朗的首份相关报告。
Int Wound J. 2020 Apr;17(2):436-442. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13290. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
3
定量评估侧卧位全髋关节置换术中骨盆前旋。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Nov 14;18(1):863. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04350-y.
4
The prediction model for intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries in orthopedics based on the new risk factors: a real-world prospective observational, cross-sectional study.基于新风险因素的骨科术中获得性压力性损伤预测模型:一项真实世界前瞻性观察性横断面研究。
Front Physiol. 2023 Jul 21;14:1170564. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1170564. eCollection 2023.
5
Prevalence of pressure ulcer and related factors in orthopaedic wards: A systematic review and meta-analysis.骨科病房压疮的患病率及相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Sep;20(7):2914-2923. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14156. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
6
Analysis of the clinical features and risk factors of device-related pressure injuries in the operating room.手术室中与器械相关压力性损伤的临床特征及危险因素分析
Int Wound J. 2023 Mar;20(3):706-715. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13912. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
7
Risk factors and the nomogram model for intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries in children with brain tumours: A retrospective study.术中获得性压力性损伤在脑肿瘤儿童中的风险因素和列线图模型:一项回顾性研究。
Int Wound J. 2023 Aug;20(6):2250-2259. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14106. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
8
Relationship between predisposing and facilitating factors: Does it influence the risk of developing peri-operative pressure injuries?诱发因素和促进因素之间的关系:是否会影响围手术期压力性损伤的发生风险?
Int Wound J. 2022 Dec;19(8):2082-2091. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13811. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
9
Frequency and risk factors of pressure injuries in clinical settings of affiliated to Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.塔比里斯医学科学大学附属医院临床环境中压力性损伤的发生频率和危险因素。
Nurs Open. 2021 Mar;8(2):808-814. doi: 10.1002/nop2.685. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
Time-to-treatment is a risk factor for the development of pressure ulcers in elderly patients with fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum.
治疗时间是老年骨盆和髋臼骨折患者发生压疮的一个危险因素。
Injury. 2020 Feb;51(2):352-356. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.007. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
4
Incidence and Risk Factors of Pressure Injuries in Surgical Spinal Patients: A Retrospective Study.手术脊柱患者压疮的发生率及危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019 Sep/Oct;46(5):397-400. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000570.
5
Preventing medical device-related skin damage.预防与医疗器械相关的皮肤损伤。
Nurs Stand. 2019 Sep 27;34(10):72-76. doi: 10.7748/ns.2019.e11375. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
6
Three-Dimensional Host Bone Coverage Required in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Its Relationship With 2-Dimensional Coverage.全髋关节置换术中三维宿主骨覆盖对发育性髋关节发育不良的要求及其与二维覆盖的关系。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.082. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
7
Risk Factors and Cup Protrusion Thresholds for Symptomatic Iliopsoas Impingement After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.全髋关节置换术后症状性腰大肌撞击综合征的危险因素和杯突阈值:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Oct;33(10):3288-3296.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 May 17.
8
The use of a logistic regression model to develop a risk assessment of intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcer.运用逻辑回归模型对术中获得性压疮的风险进行评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Aug;27(15-16):2984-2992. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14491. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
Quantifying Pelvic Motion During Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Surgical Navigation Device.使用新型手术导航设备定量测量全髋关节置换术中的骨盆运动。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3056-3060. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.046. Epub 2017 May 4.
10
Rigid Patient Positioning is Unreliable in Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中刚性患者体位固定不可靠。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1890-1893. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.038. Epub 2016 Dec 27.