Tong Man-Li, Chen Yu-Yan, Zhu Xiao-Zhen, Gao Kun, Zhang Hui-Lin, Zheng Wei-Hong, Wang Hui-Rong, Liu Li-Li, Lin Yong, Lin Li-Rong, Yang Tian-Ci
Zhongshan Hospital, Medical College of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Institute of Infectious Disease, Medical College of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Eur Neurol. 2018;80(1-2):82-86. doi: 10.1159/000493866. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
The differential diagnosis of general paresis (GP) and non-neurosyphilis (NS) dementia is not clearly defined. The present study examined the differences in clinical and laboratory features of GP and non-NS dementia.
We retrospectively examined clinical and laboratory features of 85 GP patients and 196 non-NS dementia patients. Data were collected from Zhongshan Hospital between June 2005 and June 2014.
The GP group had a higher percentage of males (83.53%, 71/85) and younger median age ([52 [interquartile range 47.0-61.0] vs. 76 [68.3-82.0] years) than the non-NS dementia group. GP have higher Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; Z = -5.809; p = 0.000) than non-NS dementia. Distribution of CDR scores were significantly higher in the non-NS group than GP group (χ2 = 29.153; p = 0.000). The laboratory findings showed significantly different total cholesterol (CH), low-density lipoprotein CH and homocysteine levels between the 2 groups. Serologic testing for syphilis revealed that the GP group had higher seropositive rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) rates than the non-NS dementia group (96.47% [82/85] vs. 0.51% [1/196], Z = -2.663, p = 0.008; 100% [85/85] vs. 1.02% [2/196], Z = -2.663, p = 0.008). Interestingly, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biochemical indices, including pleocytosis rates, increased protein levels, and positive RPR and TPPA rates in the GP group were higher than that in the non-NS dementia group.
Based on these preliminary data, patients with clinically evident symptoms of dementia, especially middle-aged males, should undergo blood tests for syphilis. All patients with positive serology results should undergo CSF examinations to diagnose GP dementia before further pharmaceutical and behavioral interventions.
麻痹性痴呆(GP)与非神经梅毒(NS)所致痴呆的鉴别诊断尚无明确定义。本研究探讨了GP与非NS所致痴呆在临床和实验室特征方面的差异。
我们回顾性分析了85例GP患者和196例非NS所致痴呆患者的临床和实验室特征。数据收集自2005年6月至2014年6月期间的中山医院。
与非NS所致痴呆组相比,GP组男性比例更高(83.53%,71/85),年龄中位数更年轻([52岁,四分位间距47.0 - 61.0] 对比 [76岁,68.3 - 82.0] 岁)。GP组的简易精神状态检查表(MMSE;Z = -5.809;p = 0.000)得分高于非NS所致痴呆组。非NS组的临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)得分分布显著高于GP组(χ2 = 29.153;p = 0.000)。实验室检查结果显示,两组之间的总胆固醇(CH)、低密度脂蛋白CH和同型半胱氨酸水平存在显著差异。梅毒血清学检测显示,GP组梅毒快速血浆反应素(RPR)和梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)血清阳性率高于非NS所致痴呆组(96.47% [82/85] 对比 0.51% [1/196],Z = -2.663,p = 0.008;100% [85/85] 对比 1.02% [2/196],Z = -2.663,p = 0.008)。有趣的是,GP组脑脊液(CSF)生化指标,包括细胞增多率、蛋白水平升高以及RPR和TPPA阳性率均高于非NS所致痴呆组。
基于这些初步数据,有明显痴呆临床症状的患者,尤其是中年男性,应进行梅毒血液检测。所有血清学检测结果呈阳性的患者在进行进一步药物和行为干预之前,均应接受脑脊液检查以诊断GP痴呆。