Department of Psychobiology, University of Valencia, Spain.
Department of Social Psychology, University of Valencia, Spain.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Jun;58(2):125-139. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12204. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
Empathy (i.e., the ability to decode emotions, as well as cognitive and emotional empathy) is involved in moral reasoning, prosocial behaviour, social and emotional adequacy, mood and behaviour regulation. Hence, alterations in these functions could reduce behaviour control and the adoption of specific types of violence such as intimate partner violence (IPV). Although interventions for IPV perpetrators focus on reducing IPV risk factors and increasing protective factors to prevent this kind of violence, the study of the effectiveness of these programmes in promoting changes in empathy (cognitive and emotional) has been neglected.
Hence, the main aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two different modalities of IPV intervention programmes (Standard Batterer Intervention Programs [SBIP] vs. SBIP + Individualized Motivational Plan [IMP]) in promoting empathic improvements after both interventions.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive SBIP (n = 40) or SBIP + IMP (n = 53). The effectiveness of the intervention in the total sample and the group effects were evaluated with general linear model repeated-measures ANOVA.
Results revealed that only the IPV perpetrators who received the SBIP + IMP were more accurate in decoding emotional facial signals and presented better cognitive empathy (perspective taking) after the intervention programme.
Our study reinforces the view that different modalities of IPV intervention might lead to different cognitive outcomes after the intervention. Thus, these results may help professionals to develop specific intervention programmes focused on improving cognitive abilities in order to reduce IPV recidivism.
Interventions for batterers' neglected empathic changes after these programmes. Not enough randomized controlled trials for these kinds of interventions. An improvement in the ability to decode emotions after the intervention programme. An improvement in cognitive empathy (perspective taking) after the intervention programme. Different modalities of IPV intervention might lead to different cognitive outcomes after the intervention.
同理心(即解码情绪的能力,以及认知和情感同理心)涉及道德推理、亲社会行为、社会和情感适应、情绪和行为调节。因此,这些功能的改变可能会降低行为控制能力,并导致特定类型的暴力行为,如亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)。尽管针对 IPV 施害者的干预措施侧重于减少 IPV 的危险因素和增加保护因素以预防这种暴力行为,但这些方案在促进同理心(认知和情感)变化方面的有效性研究却被忽视了。
因此,本研究的主要目的是比较两种不同的 IPV 干预方案(标准施虐者干预计划 [SBIP] 与 SBIP+个性化动机计划 [IMP])在两种干预后促进同理心改善的效果。
参与者被随机分配接受 SBIP(n=40)或 SBIP+IMP(n=53)。使用一般线性模型重复测量方差分析评估总样本和组效应的干预效果。
结果表明,只有接受 SBIP+IMP 的 IPV 施害者在干预方案后对情绪面部信号的解码更准确,并且表现出更好的认知同理心(换位思考)。
我们的研究进一步证实了这样一种观点,即不同模式的 IPV 干预可能会导致干预后产生不同的认知结果。因此,这些结果可能有助于专业人员制定专门的干预方案,以提高认知能力,从而降低 IPV 的再犯率。
针对这些方案中施虐者同理心变化的干预措施。针对这些干预措施的随机对照试验还不够。干预方案后解码情绪的能力有所提高。干预方案后认知同理心(换位思考)有所提高。不同模式的 IPV 干预可能会导致干预后产生不同的认知结果。