• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对亲密伴侣暴力男性施暴者的认知训练后认知灵活性和反应时间的改善:一项试点随机对照试验的结果

Cognitive Flexibility and Reaction Time Improvements After Cognitive Training Designed for Men Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Romero-Martínez Á, Santirso F, Lila M, Comes-Fayos J, Moya-Albiol L

机构信息

Department of Psychobiology, University of Valencia, Avenida Blasco Ibañez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.

Department of Social Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

J Fam Violence. 2022;37(3):461-473. doi: 10.1007/s10896-021-00304-2. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1007/s10896-021-00304-2
PMID:34376906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8339689/
Abstract

Current interventions for intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators are designed to reduce IPV recidivism by treating risk factors and increasing protective factors. However, these interventions pay less attention to cognitive functioning in IPV perpetrators and how these variables interfere with the future risk of recidivism. Therefore, the main objective of this research was to compare the effectiveness of Standard Intervention Programs for men who perpetrate IPV [SIP] + cognitive training vs SIP + placebo training in promoting cognitive improvements and reducing recidivism. Furthermore, we also aimed to assess whether changes in the risk of recidivism would be related to cognitive changes after the intervention. IPV perpetrators who agreed to participate were randomly allocated to receive SIP + cognitive training or SIP + placebo training. Several cognitive variables were assessed before and after the interventions with a complete battery of neuropsychological tests assessing processing speed, memory, attention, executive functions, and emotion decoding abilities. Moreover, we also assessed the risk of recidivism. Our data pointed out that only the IPV perpetrators who received the SIP + cognitive training improved their processing speed and cognitive flexibility after this intervention. Furthermore, these participants presented the lowest risk of recidivism after the intervention. Nonetheless, cognitive improvements and reductions in the risk of recidivism after the intervention were unrelated. Our study reinforces the importance of implementing cognitive training to reduce risk of recidivism after SIP. Hence, these results might encourage professionals to incorporate neuropsychological variables in IPV intervention programs.

摘要

目前针对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)施暴者的干预措施旨在通过处理风险因素和增加保护因素来降低IPV再犯率。然而,这些干预措施较少关注IPV施暴者的认知功能,以及这些变量如何干扰未来的再犯风险。因此,本研究的主要目的是比较针对实施IPV的男性的标准干预项目[SIP]+认知训练与SIP+安慰剂训练在促进认知改善和降低再犯率方面的有效性。此外,我们还旨在评估干预后再犯风险的变化是否与认知变化相关。同意参与的IPV施暴者被随机分配接受SIP+认知训练或SIP+安慰剂训练。在干预前后,通过一系列全面的神经心理学测试评估了几个认知变量,这些测试评估了处理速度、记忆、注意力、执行功能和情绪解码能力。此外,我们还评估了再犯风险。我们的数据指出,只有接受SIP+认知训练的IPV施暴者在干预后提高了他们的处理速度和认知灵活性。此外,这些参与者在干预后呈现出最低的再犯风险。尽管如此,干预后认知改善与再犯风险降低并无关联。我们的研究强化了实施认知训练以降低SIP后再犯风险的重要性。因此,这些结果可能会鼓励专业人员将神经心理学变量纳入IPV干预项目。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b7b/8339689/c4c1f880313a/10896_2021_304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b7b/8339689/c4c1f880313a/10896_2021_304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b7b/8339689/c4c1f880313a/10896_2021_304_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive Flexibility and Reaction Time Improvements After Cognitive Training Designed for Men Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.针对亲密伴侣暴力男性施暴者的认知训练后认知灵活性和反应时间的改善:一项试点随机对照试验的结果
J Fam Violence. 2022;37(3):461-473. doi: 10.1007/s10896-021-00304-2. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
2
Neuropsychological Performance, Substance Misuse, and Recidivism in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators.亲密伴侣暴力施暴者的神经心理表现、药物滥用与累犯情况
Psychosoc Interv. 2023 May 26;32(2):69-77. doi: 10.5093/pi2022a7. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Improvements in Empathy and Cognitive Flexibility after Court-Mandated Intervention Program in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: The Role of Alcohol Abuse.法院强制干预亲密伴侣暴力施暴者项目后共情与认知灵活性的改善:酒精滥用的作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Mar 31;13(4):394. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040394.
4
Dropout and recidivism are partly explained by emotional decoding and perspective taking deficits of intimate partner violence perpetrators.亲密伴侣暴力实施者的情绪解码和换位思考缺陷在一定程度上解释了辍学和累犯现象。
Aggress Behav. 2023 May;49(3):222-235. doi: 10.1002/ab.22064. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
5
Improving empathy with motivational strategies in batterer intervention programmes: Results of a randomized controlled trial.提高虐待干预项目中动机策略的同理心:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Jun;58(2):125-139. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12204. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
6
Differential cognitive profiles of intimate partner violence perpetrators based on alcohol consumption.基于酒精摄入的亲密伴侣暴力施害者的差异化认知特征。
Alcohol. 2018 Aug;70:61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Alexithymic traits are closely related to impulsivity and cognitive and empathic dysfunctions in intimate partner violence perpetrators: New targets for intervention.述情障碍特质与亲密伴侣暴力施暴者的冲动性、认知及共情功能障碍密切相关:干预的新靶点。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Jan-Feb;28(1):71-79. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1594233. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
8
A Meta-analysis of Cognitive Functioning in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators.亲密关系暴力施暴者认知功能的荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Dec;34(4):1191-1212. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09628-w. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
9
The importance of impulsivity and attention switching deficits in perpetrators convicted for intimate partner violence.冲动和注意力转换缺陷在因亲密伴侣暴力而被定罪的犯罪者中的重要性。
Aggress Behav. 2019 Mar;45(2):129-138. doi: 10.1002/ab.21802. Epub 2018 Nov 25.
10
Can Attention and Working Memory Impairments of Intimate Partner Perpetrators Explain Their Risky Decision Making?亲密伴侣施暴者的注意力和工作记忆损伤能否解释其冒险决策?
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jun;36(11-12):NP6492-NP6507. doi: 10.1177/0886260518814263. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Fixation Times During Emotional Decoding in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: An Eye-Tracking Pilot Study.亲密伴侣暴力施暴者情绪解码过程中的注视时间探索:一项眼动追踪初步研究
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 8;15(7):732. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15070732.
2
Emotional skills and health assessment in interventions for intimate partner violence perpetrators: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.亲密伴侣暴力施暴者干预措施中的情绪技能与健康评估:随机对照试验的系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 9;20(7):e0328034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328034. eCollection 2025.
3
Executive dysfunction and cortical variations among intimate partner violence perpetrators and the association with sexism.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental disorders and intimate partner violence perpetrated by men towards women: A Swedish population-based longitudinal study.男性对女性实施的精神障碍和亲密伴侣暴力:一项瑞典基于人群的纵向研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 17;16(12):e1002995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002995. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
A systematic review of moderators of cognitive remediation response for people with schizophrenia.对精神分裂症患者认知康复反应调节因素的系统评价。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2019 Sep 5;19:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2019.100160. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Dropout from Court-Mandated Intervention Programs for Intimate Partner Violence Offenders: The Relevance of Alcohol Misuse and Cognitive Impairments.
亲密伴侣暴力行为者的执行功能障碍和皮质变化,以及与性别歧视的关系。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Jul 4;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae046.
4
A process model of parental executive functioning as a spillover mechanism linking interparental conflict and parenting difficulties across parenting domains.父母执行功能的一个过程模型,作为一个溢出机制,将父母间冲突和父母教养困难联系起来,跨越了各个教养领域。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Jun;60(6):1052-1065. doi: 10.1037/dev0001743. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
5
A Meta-analysis of Cognitive Functioning in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators.亲密关系暴力施暴者认知功能的荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Dec;34(4):1191-1212. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09628-w. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
6
Alterations in executive functions in inmates convicted for violent behavior: a systematic review.暴力犯罪服刑人员执行功能的改变:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1066474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1066474. eCollection 2023.
7
Neuropsychological Performance, Substance Misuse, and Recidivism in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators.亲密伴侣暴力施暴者的神经心理表现、药物滥用与累犯情况
Psychosoc Interv. 2023 May 26;32(2):69-77. doi: 10.5093/pi2022a7. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Methodological Challenges in Group-based Randomised Controlled Trials for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: A Meta-summary.针对亲密伴侣暴力施暴者的群组随机对照试验中的方法学挑战:一项元综述
Psychosoc Interv. 2023 May 26;32(2):123-136. doi: 10.5093/pi2023a9. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Psychological Tasks Used in Neuroimaging with Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence against Women: A Systematic Review.用于对针对女性的亲密伴侣暴力男性实施者进行神经影像学研究的心理任务:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 23;19(15):8971. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158971.
从针对亲密伴侣暴力罪犯的法庭授权干预项目中辍学:酒精滥用和认知障碍的相关性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 6;16(13):2402. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132402.
4
Improving empathy with motivational strategies in batterer intervention programmes: Results of a randomized controlled trial.提高虐待干预项目中动机策略的同理心:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Jun;58(2):125-139. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12204. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
5
When Intimate Partner Violence Meets Same Sex Couples: A Review of Same Sex Intimate Partner Violence.当亲密伴侣暴力遭遇同性伴侣:同性亲密伴侣暴力综述
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 21;9:1506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01506. eCollection 2018.
6
Differential cognitive profiles of intimate partner violence perpetrators based on alcohol consumption.基于酒精摄入的亲密伴侣暴力施害者的差异化认知特征。
Alcohol. 2018 Aug;70:61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Individualized motivational plans in batterer intervention programs: A randomized clinical trial.在施暴者干预项目中制定个性化激励计划:一项随机临床试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Apr;86(4):309-320. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000291.
8
Acceptability of Family Violence: Underlying Ties Between Intimate Partner Violence and Child Abuse.家庭暴力的可接受性:亲密伴侣暴力与虐待儿童之间的潜在联系。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Sep;35(17-18):3217-3236. doi: 10.1177/0886260517707310. Epub 2017 May 12.
9
Individual Versus Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Partner-Violent Men: A Preliminary Randomized Trial.个体与团体认知行为疗法对有伴侣暴力行为的男性:一项初步的随机试验。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Aug;35(15-16):2846-2868. doi: 10.1177/0886260517705666. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
More Likely to Dropout, but What if They Don't? Partner Violence Offenders With Alcohol Abuse Problems Completing Batterer Intervention Programs.更有可能辍学,但如果他们没有呢?有酒精滥用问题的亲密伴侣暴力犯罪者完成施暴者干预项目的情况。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 May;35(9-10):1958-1981. doi: 10.1177/0886260517699952. Epub 2017 Apr 3.