• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病管理项目中谁受益最大:提高目标效率。

Who benefits most in disease management programs: Improving target efficiency.

机构信息

Questrom School of Business and NBER, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2019 Feb;28(2):189-203. doi: 10.1002/hec.3836. Epub 2018 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1002/hec.3836
PMID:30345722
Abstract

Disease management programs aim to reduce cost by improving the quality of care for chronic diseases. Evidence of their effectiveness is mixed. Reducing health care spending sufficiently to cover program costs has proved particularly challenging. This study uses a difference in differences design to examine the impact of a diabetes disease management program for high risk patients on preventive tests, health outcomes, and cost of care. Heterogeneity is examined along the dimensions of severity (measured using the proxy of poor glycemic control) and preventive testing received in the baseline year. Although disease management programs tend to focus on the sickest, the impact of this program concentrates in the group of people who had not received recommended tests in the preintervention period. If confirmed, such findings are practically important to improve cost-effectiveness in disease management programs by targeting relevant subgroups defined both based on severity and on (missing) test information.

摘要

疾病管理计划旨在通过提高慢性病护理质量来降低成本。但它们的有效性证据参差不齐。要想降低医疗保健支出以足以覆盖项目成本,这被证明是极具挑战性的。本研究采用差异中的差异设计来考察高危患者糖尿病疾病管理计划对预防检测、健康结果和护理成本的影响。沿着严重程度(使用血糖控制不佳的代理指标衡量)和基线年接受的预防检测这两个维度来检查异质性。尽管疾病管理计划往往侧重于最病重的患者,但该计划的影响集中在那些在干预前没有接受推荐检测的人群中。如果得到证实,这些发现对于通过针对基于严重程度和(缺失)检测信息的相关亚组来提高疾病管理计划的成本效益具有重要的实际意义。

相似文献

1
Who benefits most in disease management programs: Improving target efficiency.疾病管理项目中谁受益最大:提高目标效率。
Health Econ. 2019 Feb;28(2):189-203. doi: 10.1002/hec.3836. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
2
Clinical effectiveness and cost savings in diabetes care, supported by pharmacist counselling.在药剂师咨询的支持下,糖尿病护理的临床效果及成本节约。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Jan-Feb;57(1):102-108.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
3
Information technology for the treatment of diabetes: improving outcomes and controlling costs.用于糖尿病治疗的信息技术:改善治疗效果并控制成本。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Mar;14(2 Suppl):S12-7.
4
The Impact of Patient-Centered versus Didactic Education Programs in Chronic Patients by Severity: The Case of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.以患者为中心的教育计划与讲授式教育计划对不同严重程度慢性病患者的影响:以2型糖尿病为例
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):353-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
Screening for type 2 diabetes: literature review and economic modelling.2型糖尿病筛查:文献综述与经济建模
Health Technol Assess. 2007 May;11(17):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-125. doi: 10.3310/hta11170.
6
Evaluation of an Electronic Health Record System With a Disease Management Program and Health Care Treatment Costs for Danish Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.评估一个电子健康记录系统与疾病管理计划和丹麦 2 型糖尿病患者的医疗费用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e206603. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6603.
7
Effects of a population-based diabetes management program in Singapore.新加坡一项基于人群的糖尿病管理项目的效果。
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Sep 1;20(9):e388-98.
8
Effects of telemonitoring on glycaemic control and healthcare costs in type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled trial.远程监测对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和医疗费用的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Oct;24(9):586-595. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17723943. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
9
Long-term Clinical and Cost Outcomes of a Pharmacist-managed Risk Factor Management Clinic in Singapore: An Observational Study.新加坡药剂师管理的危险因素管理诊所的长期临床和成本结果:一项观察性研究。
Clin Ther. 2017 Dec;39(12):2355-2365. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
10
Improving quality of care in people with Type 2 diabetes through the Associazione Medici Diabetologi-annals initiative: a long-term cost-effectiveness analysis.通过 Associazione Medici Diabetologi-annals 计划提高 2 型糖尿病患者的护理质量:一项长期的成本效益分析。
Diabet Med. 2014 May;31(5):615-23. doi: 10.1111/dme.12366. Epub 2013 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Compliance with clinical guidelines: the role of incentives and competition between practitioners.遵循临床指南:从业者间激励措施及竞争的作用
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01784-5.
2
Patients' and stakeholders' experiences of a personalized self-management SUPport program (P-SUP) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease: a qualitative process evaluation : Maximilian Scholl.患者和利益相关者对 2 型糖尿病和/或冠心病患者个性化自我管理支持计划(P-SUP)的体验:定性过程评价
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2566. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20034-6.
3
Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care-an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany.
德国基层医疗中疾病管理项目的态度与经验——对全科医生的探索性调查
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2021 Oct;171(13-14):310-320. doi: 10.1007/s10354-021-00867-1. Epub 2021 Aug 2.