• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和利益相关者对 2 型糖尿病和/或冠心病患者个性化自我管理支持计划(P-SUP)的体验:定性过程评价

Patients' and stakeholders' experiences of a personalized self-management SUPport program (P-SUP) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease: a qualitative process evaluation : Maximilian Scholl.

机构信息

Institute of Movement Therapy and Movement-oriented Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sports University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Institute of Psychology, German Sports University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2566. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20034-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-20034-6
PMID:39300369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11414288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease cause medical, social, and economic burdens worldwide. Disease management programs in Germany mostly lack components to improve patients' self-management and health-promoting lifestyles despite clear guideline recommendations. Therefore, a Personalized Self-Management Support Program (P-SUP) was developed, which includes: (1) peer support groups; (2) telephone coaching; (3) feedback reports and, (4) a web portal. This study aims to explore patients' and implementing stakeholders' experiences in the implementation of P-SUP to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the intervention.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted using face-to-face focus group interviews with participating patients and telephone-based one-to-one expert interviews with implementing stakeholders, involved in the delivery of the intervention. The transcribed interview reports were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, and the contents were categorized according to Donabedian's Structure-Process-Outcome framework.

RESULTS

A total of six themes among patients (N = 35) and five themes among implementing stakeholders (N = 32) represent the experiences. The patient themes were: (1) technical conditions, (2) indoor facilities, (3) group composition, (4) acceptance of digital components, (5) supervision and feedback and (6) impact on lifestyle behavior. The themes among the implementing stakeholders were: (1) multiprofessional approach, (2) human resources, (3) patient acceptance, (4) supervision and feedback and (5) impact on lifestyle behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiprofessional interventions such as P-SUP appear to be valuable for patients and implementing stakeholders. Although infrastructural barriers made the implementation of peer support and digital patient education difficult, patients rated the exchange with peers and experts on health-related topics positively. The lack of supervision and feedback during the course of the intervention might be compensated by regular telephone coaching. The findings from this study can be used in future studies to guide researchers and implementing stakeholders and to improve the feasibility and effectiveness of complex interventions in different contexts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The P-SUP study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 16/07/2020 under the registration number DRKS00020592.

摘要

背景

2 型糖尿病和冠心病等慢性病在全球范围内造成了医疗、社会和经济负担。尽管有明确的指南建议,但德国的疾病管理计划大多缺乏改善患者自我管理和促进健康生活方式的内容。因此,开发了个性化自我管理支持计划(P-SUP),其中包括:(1)同伴支持小组;(2)电话辅导;(3)反馈报告和(4)一个网络门户。本研究旨在探讨患者和实施利益相关者在实施 P-SUP 方面的经验,以确定干预实施的障碍和促进因素。

方法

采用面对面焦点小组访谈和参与干预实施的患者和实施利益相关者的电话一对一专家访谈进行定性研究。使用定性内容分析对转录的访谈报告进行分析,并根据 Donabedian 的结构-过程-结果框架对内容进行分类。

结果

患者(N=35)和实施利益相关者(N=32)共提出了 6 个主题,代表了他们的经验。患者主题包括:(1)技术条件;(2)室内设施;(3)小组组成;(4)对数字组件的接受程度;(5)监督和反馈;(6)对生活方式行为的影响。实施利益相关者的主题包括:(1)多专业方法;(2)人力资源;(3)患者接受度;(4)监督和反馈;(5)对生活方式行为的影响。

结论

多专业干预措施,如 P-SUP,对患者和实施利益相关者似乎很有价值。尽管基础设施障碍使得同伴支持和数字患者教育的实施变得困难,但患者对与同伴和专家就健康相关话题的交流评价很高。在干预过程中缺乏监督和反馈可以通过定期的电话辅导来弥补。本研究的结果可用于未来的研究,为研究人员和实施利益相关者提供指导,并提高不同背景下复杂干预措施的可行性和有效性。

试验注册

P-SUP 研究于 2020 年 7 月 16 日在德国临床试验注册处(DRKS)注册,注册号为 DRKS00020592。

相似文献

1
Patients' and stakeholders' experiences of a personalized self-management SUPport program (P-SUP) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease: a qualitative process evaluation : Maximilian Scholl.患者和利益相关者对 2 型糖尿病和/或冠心病患者个性化自我管理支持计划(P-SUP)的体验:定性过程评价
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2566. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20034-6.
2
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial referring to a Personalised Self-management SUPport Programme (P-SUP) for persons enrolled in a disease management programme for type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or for coronary heart disease.一项针对参加 2 型糖尿病和/或冠心病疾病管理计划的个体的个性化自我管理支持计划(P-SUP)的实用随机对照试验。
Trials. 2021 Sep 27;22(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05636-4.
3
The Michigan men's diabetes project: perspectives on a peer-led diabetes self-management and support intervention for Black men with type 2 diabetes.密歇根男性糖尿病项目:关于同伴主导的2型糖尿病黑人男性糖尿病自我管理与支持干预的观点
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1612. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11884-2.
4
Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Digital Technologies for Heart Disease Diagnosis: Qualitative Study.探索利益相关者对实施心脏病诊断数字技术的障碍和促进因素的看法:定性研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Mar 5;9:e66464. doi: 10.2196/66464.
5
Intervention Fidelity Focusing on Interaction between Participants and Facilitators in a Telephone-Delivered Health Coaching Intervention for the Prevention and Management of Type 2 Diabetes.关注参与者和促进者之间互动的干预保真度在电话健康教练干预中预防和管理 2 型糖尿病
Nutrients. 2021 Oct 28;13(11):3862. doi: 10.3390/nu13113862.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of the National Health Service diabetes prevention programme in England: qualitative study with service users, intervention providers and deliverers, commissioners and referrers.利益相关者对英格兰国民保健服务糖尿病预防计划的看法和体验:对服务使用者、干预提供者和实施者、委托人和推荐者进行的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05160-2.
8
Exploring the lived experiences of individuals with Parkinson's disease and their relatives: insights into care provision experiences, disease management support, self-management strategies, and future needs in Germany (qualitative study).探索帕金森病患者及其亲属的生活体验:了解德国的照护提供经验、疾病管理支持、自我管理策略以及未来需求(定性研究)。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03696-y.
9
Stakeholders' Perspectives, Needs, and Barriers to Self-Management for People With Physical Disabilities Experiencing Chronic Conditions: Focus Group Study.慢性病身体残疾者自我管理的利益相关者观点、需求和障碍:焦点小组研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Dec 18;10:e43309. doi: 10.2196/43309.
10
Barriers, Facilitators, and Requirements for a Telerehabilitation Aftercare Program for Patients After Occupational Injuries: Semistructured Interviews With Key Stakeholders.职业伤害后远程康复后护理计划的障碍、促进因素和要求:与主要利益相关者的半结构化访谈。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 8;8:e51865. doi: 10.2196/51865.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary Care Physicians' Experiences With and Adaptations to Time Constraints.基层医疗医师应对时间限制的经验及适应措施。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e248827. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8827.
2
Does health literacy influence health-related lifestyle behaviors among specialists of health management? A cross-sectional study.健康素养是否会影响健康管理专家的健康相关生活方式行为?一项横断面研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 20;25(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02263-1.
3
Theoretical Derivation of a Telephone-Based Health Coaching Intervention for Promoting Physical Activity and Healthy Nutrition.基于电话的健康辅导干预促进体力活动和健康营养的理论推导。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 30;20(13):6271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20136271.
4
The Influencing Contexts and Potential Mechanisms Behind the Use of Web-Based Self-management Support Interventions: Realistic Evaluation.基于网络的自我管理支持干预措施使用背后的影响背景及潜在机制:现实评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jul 1;9(3):e34925. doi: 10.2196/34925.
5
The effectiveness of the use of telehealth programs in the care of individuals with hypertension and, or diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.远程医疗项目在高血压和/或糖尿病患者护理中的应用效果:系统评价与荟萃分析
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 May 28;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00846-5.
6
Peer support for people with chronic conditions: a systematic review of reviews.慢性病患者的同伴支持:系统评价综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 31;22(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07816-7.
7
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
8
Effectiveness of the German disease management programs: quasi-experimental analyses assessing the population-level health impact.德国疾病管理项目的效果:评估人群健康影响的准实验分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):2092. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12050-7.
9
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial referring to a Personalised Self-management SUPport Programme (P-SUP) for persons enrolled in a disease management programme for type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or for coronary heart disease.一项针对参加 2 型糖尿病和/或冠心病疾病管理计划的个体的个性化自我管理支持计划(P-SUP)的实用随机对照试验。
Trials. 2021 Sep 27;22(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05636-4.
10
Efficacy of Dietary and Supplementation Interventions for Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes.膳食和补充干预措施对 2 型糖尿病个体的疗效。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 12;13(7):2378. doi: 10.3390/nu13072378.