1Animal Welfare Science Centre,Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences,University of Melbourne,Parkville,VIC 3052,Australia.
2Agriculture Victoria Research,Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources,Bundoora,VIC 3083,Australia.
Animal. 2019 Jun;13(6):1287-1296. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118002744. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
There is community concern about the treatment of farm animals post-farm gate, particularly animal transport and slaughter. Relationships between lamb behavioural and physiological variables on farm, stockperson, dog and lamb behavioural variables pre-slaughter and plasma cortisol, glucose and lactate in lambs post-slaughter were studied in 400 lambs. The lambs were observed in three behavioural tests, novel arena, flight distance to a human and temperament tests, before transport for slaughter. Closed-circuit television video footage was used to record stockperson, dog and lamb behaviour immediately before slaughter. Blood samples for cortisol, glucose and lactate analyses were collected on farm following the three behavioural tests and immediately post-slaughter. The regression models that best predicted plasma cortisol, glucose and lactate concentrations post-slaughter included a mixture of stockperson and dog behavioural variables as well as lamb variables both on-farm and pre-slaughter. These regression models accounted for 33%, 34% and 44% of the variance in plasma cortisol, glucose and lactate concentrations post-slaughter, respectively. Some of the stockperson and dog behaviours pre-slaughter that were predictive of the stress and metabolic variables post-slaughter included the duration of negative stockperson behaviours such as fast locomotion and lifting/pulling lambs, and the duration of dog behaviours such as lunging and barking at the lamb, while some of the predictive lamb behaviour variables included the durations of jumping and fleeing. Some of the physiological and behavioural responses to the behavioural tests on farm were also predictive of the stress and metabolic variables post-slaughter. These relationships support the well-demonstrated effect of handling on fear and stress responses in livestock, and although not direct evidence of causal relationships, highlight the potential benefits of training stockpeople to reduce fear and stress in sheep at abattoirs.
人们对农场动物离开农场后的处理方式,尤其是动物运输和屠宰过程,存在一些担忧。本研究在 400 只羔羊中,研究了农场中羔羊行为和生理变量、饲养员、狗和羔羊在屠宰前的行为变量,以及屠宰后羔羊血浆皮质醇、葡萄糖和乳酸之间的关系。在运输屠宰之前,对羔羊进行了三个行为测试:新竞技场、对人的飞行距离和气质测试。使用闭路电视视频记录屠宰前饲养员、狗和羔羊的行为。在三个行为测试后和屠宰后立即在农场采集血液样本,用于皮质醇、葡萄糖和乳酸分析。最佳预测屠宰后血浆皮质醇、葡萄糖和乳酸浓度的回归模型包括饲养员和狗的行为变量以及羔羊的行为变量,包括农场和屠宰前的变量。这些回归模型分别解释了屠宰后血浆皮质醇、葡萄糖和乳酸浓度变化的 33%、34%和 44%。一些屠宰前预测羔羊应激和代谢变量的饲养员和狗的行为,包括饲养员的负面行为(如快速移动和提、拉羔羊)的持续时间,以及狗的行为(如向羔羊冲刺和吠叫)的持续时间,而一些预测性的羔羊行为变量包括跳跃和逃离的持续时间。一些在农场进行行为测试的生理和行为反应也可以预测屠宰后的应激和代谢变量。这些关系支持了处理对牲畜恐惧和应激反应的明显影响,尽管不是因果关系的直接证据,但强调了培训饲养员减少屠宰场绵羊恐惧和应激的潜在好处。