Giner Emmanuel, Tew David P, Garniron Yann, Alavi Ali
Laboratoire de Chimie théorique , Sorbonne Universit , UMR 7616, 4 place Jussieu , 75252 Paris , France.
Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research , Heisenbergstraβe 1 , 70569 Stuttgart , Germany.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2018 Dec 11;14(12):6240-6252. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00591. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
We present a comprehensive theoretical study of the physical phenomena that determine the relative energies of three of the lowest electronic states of each of the square-planar copper complexes [CuCl], [Cu(NH)], and [Cu(HO)] and present a detailed analysis of the extent to which truncated configuration interaction (CI) and coupled cluster (CC) theories succeed in predicing the excitation energies. We find that ligand-metal charge transfer (CT) single excitations play a crucial role in the correct determination of the properties of these systems, even though the first impact of these CT on the energetics of these systems appears at fourth-order in perturbation theory. We provide a minimal selected CI space for describing these systems with multireference theories and use a high-order perturbation theory analysis within this space to derive a simple and general physical picture for the LMCT process. We find that coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) energy differences agree very well with near full CI values even though the D diagnostics are large, which casts doubt on the usefulness of single-amplitude-based multireference diagnostics. Configuration interaction singles and doubles (CISD) severely underestimates the excitation energies, and the failure is a direct consequence of the size-inconsisency errors in CISD. Finally, we present reference values for the energy differences computed using explicitly correlated CCSD(T) and BCCD(T) theory.
我们对决定平面正方形铜配合物[CuCl]、[Cu(NH)]和[Cu(HO)]中每个配合物的三个最低电子态相对能量的物理现象进行了全面的理论研究,并详细分析了截断组态相互作用(CI)和耦合簇(CC)理论在预测激发能方面的成功程度。我们发现,配体-金属电荷转移(CT)单激发在正确确定这些体系的性质中起着关键作用,尽管这些CT对这些体系能量学的首次影响在微扰理论中出现在四阶。我们提供了一个最小的选定CI空间,用于用多参考理论描述这些体系,并在这个空间内使用高阶微扰理论分析来推导LMCT过程的简单通用物理图像。我们发现,尽管D诊断值很大,但耦合簇单双激发(CCSD)能量差与接近完全CI值非常吻合,这让人对基于单振幅的多参考诊断的有用性产生怀疑。组态相互作用单双激发(CISD)严重低估了激发能,这种失败是CISD中尺寸不一致误差的直接后果。最后,我们给出了使用显式相关的CCSD(T)和BCCD(T)理论计算的能量差参考值。