Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8504, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Mail Stop 740, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.
J Neurodev Disord. 2018 Oct 22;10(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s11689-018-9247-8.
Language delay is extremely common in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), yet it is unclear whether measurable variation in early language is associated with genetic liability for ASD. Assessment of language development in unaffected siblings of children with ASD can inform whether decreased early language ability aggregates with inherited risk for ASD and serves as an ASD endophenotype.
We implemented two approaches: (1) a meta-analysis of studies comparing language delay, a categorical indicator of language function, and language scores, a continuous metric, in unaffected toddlers at high and low familial risk for ASD, and (2) a parallel analysis of 350 unaffected 24-month-olds in the Infant Brain Imaging Study (IBIS), a prospective study of infants at high and low familial risk for ASD. An advantage of the former was its detection of group differences from pooled data across unique samples; an advantage of the latter was its sensitivity in quantifying early manifestations of language delay while accounting for covariates within a single large sample.
Meta-analysis showed that high-risk siblings without ASD (HR-noASD) were three to four times more likely to exhibit language delay versus low-risk siblings without ASD (LR-noASD) and had lower mean receptive and expressive language scores. Analyses of IBIS data corroborated that language delay, specifically receptive language delay, was more frequent in the HR-noASD (n = 235) versus LR-noASD group (n = 115). IBIS language scores were continuously and unimodally distributed, with a pathological shift towards decreased language function in HR-noASD siblings. The elevated inherited risk for ASD was associated with lower receptive and expressive language scores when controlling for sociodemographic factors. For receptive but not expressive language, the effect of risk group remained significant even when controlling for nonverbal cognition.
Greater frequency of language delay and a lower distribution of language scores in high-risk, unaffected toddler-aged siblings support decreased early language ability as an endophenotype for ASD, with a more pronounced effect for receptive versus expressive language. Further characterization of language development is warranted to refine genetic investigations of ASD and to elucidate factors influencing the progression of core autistic traits and related symptoms.
语言延迟在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童中极为常见,但尚不清楚早期语言中是否存在可测量的差异与 ASD 的遗传易感性有关。对 ASD 患儿未受影响的兄弟姐妹的语言发育进行评估,可以了解早期语言能力下降是否与 ASD 的遗传风险聚集,并作为 ASD 的内表型。
我们采用了两种方法:(1)对比较高、低 ASD 家族风险的未受影响幼儿的语言延迟(语言功能的分类指标)和语言评分(连续度量)的研究进行荟萃分析;(2)对婴儿脑成像研究(IBIS)中 350 名未受影响的 24 月龄婴儿进行平行分析,该研究是对高、低 ASD 家族风险的婴儿进行的前瞻性研究。前者的优势在于它可以从多个独特样本的汇总数据中检测到组间差异;后者的优势在于它可以在单个大样本中量化语言延迟的早期表现,同时考虑协变量。
荟萃分析表明,无 ASD 的高风险兄弟姐妹(HR-noASD)比无 ASD 的低风险兄弟姐妹(LR-noASD)出现语言延迟的可能性高出三到四倍,且他们的接受性和表达性语言评分较低。对 IBIS 数据的分析证实,语言延迟,特别是接受性语言延迟,在 HR-noASD(n=235)组比 LR-noASD 组(n=115)更为常见。IBIS 语言评分呈连续且单峰分布,HR-noASD 兄弟姐妹的语言功能呈病理性下降。在控制社会人口因素后,ASD 的遗传风险升高与接受性和表达性语言评分降低相关。对于接受性语言但不是表达性语言,即使在控制非言语认知后,风险组的影响仍然显著。
高风险、未受影响的幼儿期兄弟姐妹中语言延迟的发生率更高,语言评分的分布更低,这支持了早期语言能力下降作为 ASD 的内表型,接受性语言比表达性语言的影响更为明显。进一步对语言发育进行特征描述对于完善 ASD 的遗传研究和阐明影响核心自闭症特征及相关症状进展的因素是有必要的。