Department of Radiology, AHEPA University General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
1st Neurological Department, AHEPA University General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):2137-2145. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5773-8. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of color Doppler imaging (CDI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for diagnosing carotid ulceration, having multi-detector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) as the reference method.
Patients with carotid disease referred for ultrasound (US), either due to the occurrence of neurovascular symptoms or for screening purposes, were included in this study if at least one plaque causing moderate (50-69%) or severe (70-99%) internal carotid artery stenosis was detected. Carotid US with CDI technique, CEUS, and MDCTA were performed in all patients, investigating the presence of ulceration. The agreement between modalities was evaluated using kappa statistics.
The study population included 54 patients (median age 62 years, inter-quartile range 16.2) and 66 carotid arteries. The mean degree of stenosis was 68.5% (SD 12.2%) while 47.1% of plaques were symptomatic. MDCTA characterized 28.8% of plaques as smooth, 45.5% irregular, and 24.3% ulcerated. Flow reversal was detected with CDI in 65.5% of ulcerations, while swirling of the microbubbles and neovessels adjacent to the ulcer were detected with CEUS in 17.64%. The agreement for ulceration diagnosis was moderate between CDI and CEUS (kappa 0.473) and between CDI and MDCTA (kappa 0.473) and very good between CEUS and MDCTA (kappa 0.921). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CDI for the diagnosis of ulceration were 41.2%, 97.95%, 87.5%, 82.8% respectively, while CEUS respective measures were 94.1%, 97.95%, 94.1%, and 97.95%.
CEUS outperformed CDI in terms of agreement with MDCTA and diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of ulcerated carotid plaque.
• Superficial ulceration is a significant feature of carotid plaque vulnerability. • Color Doppler imaging has the potential to demonstrate carotid plaque ulceration but is characterized by limited sensitivity and moderate agreement with the reference method of multi-detector computed tomography angiography. • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound outperforms color Doppler imaging in terms of sensitivity for the detection of carotid plaque ulceration and in agreement with the reference method of multi-detector computed tomography angiography.
以多排螺旋 CT 血管造影(MDCTA)为参考方法,评估彩色多普勒成像(CDI)和超声造影(CEUS)诊断颈动脉溃疡的诊断准确性。
本研究纳入因发生血管神经症状或筛查目的而行超声(US)检查且至少有一处斑块导致颈内动脉中度(50%-69%)或重度(70%-99%)狭窄的颈动脉疾病患者。所有患者均行颈动脉 US 检查,包括 CDI 技术、CEUS 和 MDCTA,以观察溃疡的存在。采用κ 统计评估各模态间的一致性。
该研究共纳入 54 例患者(中位年龄 62 岁,四分位距 16.2)和 66 处颈动脉。平均狭窄程度为 68.5%(标准差 12.2%),47.1%的斑块为症状性。MDCTA 将 28.8%的斑块描述为光滑,45.5%为不规则,24.3%为溃疡。CDI 检测到 65.5%的溃疡存在血流反转,CEUS 检测到 17.64%的微泡漩涡和溃疡周围新生血管。CDI 与 CEUS 间(κ=0.473)及 CDI 与 MDCTA 间(κ=0.473)对溃疡的诊断一致性为中度,CEUS 与 MDCTA 间为极好(κ=0.921)。CDI 对溃疡诊断的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 41.2%、97.95%、87.5%、82.8%,CEUS 则分别为 94.1%、97.95%、94.1%、97.95%。
CEUS 在与 MDCTA 的一致性和诊断准确性方面优于 CDI,可用于诊断溃疡型颈动脉斑块。
表面溃疡是颈动脉斑块易损性的重要特征。
CDI 具有显示颈动脉斑块溃疡的潜力,但敏感性有限,与多排螺旋 CT 血管造影的参考方法的一致性为中度。
与多排螺旋 CT 血管造影的参考方法相比,CEUS 对颈动脉斑块溃疡的检测具有更高的敏感性和极好的一致性。