• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估定性研究提案的十条标准。

Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative research proposals.

作者信息

Cobb A K, Hagemaster J N

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 1987 Apr;26(4):138-43. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19870401-04.

DOI:10.3928/0148-4834-19870401-04
PMID:3035126
Abstract

With the proliferation of interest in qualitative research in nursing comes the attendant problem of how to evaluate it appropriately. Qualitative research has its own unique history, philosophical foundations, and methodologies that separate it from the quantitative approach. Although the literature is crowded with guidelines for evaluating the latter, little is offered for the qualitative reviewer. The Research Proposal Evaluation Form: Qualitative Methodology is a partial solution to this dilemma. It provides a framework for critiquing the proposal phase of a qualitative study and can be an important guide both for the educator and for the novice researcher.

摘要

随着护理领域对定性研究兴趣的激增,随之而来的问题是如何对其进行恰当评估。定性研究有着自己独特的历史、哲学基础和方法,这使其有别于定量研究方法。尽管文献中充斥着评估定量研究的指南,但针对定性研究评审者的内容却很少。《研究提案评估表:定性研究方法》是解决这一困境的部分方案。它为评判定性研究的提案阶段提供了一个框架,对教育工作者和新手研究者而言都可能是一份重要的指南。

相似文献

1
Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative research proposals.评估定性研究提案的十条标准。
J Nurs Educ. 1987 Apr;26(4):138-43. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19870401-04.
2
Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research.研究评论分步指南。第2部分:定性研究。
Br J Nurs. 2007;16(12):738-44. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.12.23726.
3
The qualitative research proposal.定性研究计划书。
Curationis. 2008 Dec;31(4):62-72. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v31i4.1062.
4
A review committee's guide for evaluating qualitative proposals.评审委员会评估定性研究提案指南。
Qual Health Res. 2003 Jul;13(6):833-51. doi: 10.1177/1049732303013006005.
5
Evaluating quantitative research reports.评估定量研究报告。
Nephrol Nurs J. 2005 Jan-Feb;32(1):61-4.
6
Interpretive phenomenological methodologists in nursing: A critical analysis and comparison.护理中的阐释现象学方法学家:批判性分析与比较。
Nurs Inq. 2019 Apr;26(2):e12280. doi: 10.1111/nin.12280. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
7
Understanding and critiquing qualitative research papers.理解与评判定性研究论文。
Nurs Times. 2006;102(29):30-2.
8
Ethical review and the assessment of research proposals using qualitative research methods.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2008 Jul;27(3):43-53. doi: 10.1007/BF03351300.
9
Mixed methods research.混合方法研究。
Nurs Stand. 2015 Apr 8;29(32):41-7. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.32.41.e8858.
10
Research essentials.
Nurs Child Young People. 2016 Apr;28(3):12. doi: 10.7748/ncyp.28.3.12.s13.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of Strategies for Enhancing Clarity and Reader Accessibility of Qualitative Research Results.增强定性研究结果清晰度和读者可理解性的策略综述。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7124. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7124.
2
Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool.系统梳理现有工具,以评估定性研究方法的优缺点:CAMELOT 工具开发的第一阶段。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 4;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0728-6.
3
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.
髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
4
Negotiating Peril: The Lived Experience of Rural, Low-Income Women Exposed to IPV During Pregnancy and Postpartum.应对危机:孕期及产后遭受亲密伴侣暴力的农村低收入女性的真实经历
Violence Against Women. 2016 Jul;22(8):943-65. doi: 10.1177/1077801215614972. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
5
The Experience of Caregivers Living with Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.癌症患者家属的护理经历:一项系统综述与元综合分析
J Pers Med. 2015 Nov 19;5(4):406-39. doi: 10.3390/jpm5040406.
6
A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.一种识别原发性混合方法研究关键评估标准的策略。
Qual Quant. 2004 Aug;38(4):351-65. doi: 10.1023/b:ququ.0000043126.25329.85.
7
Teenage pregnancy and social disadvantage: systematic review integrating controlled trials and qualitative studies.青少年怀孕与社会劣势:整合对照试验和定性研究的系统评价
BMJ. 2009 Nov 12;339:b4254. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4254.
8
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.系统评价中定性研究的主题综合方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
9
Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research.将系统评价方法应用于关于人们观点的研究:来自公共卫生研究的一个例子。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Sep;58(9):794-800. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.014829.
10
Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews.在系统评价中将定性研究与试验相结合。
BMJ. 2004 Apr 24;328(7446):1010-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7446.1010.