Suppr超能文献

在健康志愿者中比较使用西门子 Acuson S3000、GE LOGIQ E9、飞利浦 EPIQ7 和东芝 Aplio 500(软件版本 5.0 和 6.0)进行的肝脏剪切波弹性成像测量。

Comparison of Liver Shear Wave Elastography Measurements using Siemens Acuson S3000, GE LOGIQ E9, Philips EPIQ7 and Toshiba Aplio 500 (Software Versions 5.0 and 6.0) in Healthy Volunteers.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Ultraschall Med. 2019 Aug;40(4):504-512. doi: 10.1055/a-0651-0542. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

Abstract

AIM

To compare ARFI-based elastography procedures of the GE LOGIQ E9, Philips EPIQ7, and Toshiba Aplio 500 (versions 5.0 and 6.0) ultrasound scanners with the Siemens Acuson S3000 reference scanner in subjects with healthy livers, taking various impact factors into account.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study consisted of two subsequent study parts. Study 1 (n = 205) evaluated the 2D-SWE techniques of GE and Toshiba 5.0 and the pSWE technique of the Philips scanner against the reference scanner Siemens. Study 2 (n = 113) evaluated Toshiba 6.0 against Siemens in a different cohort. Out of 433 study participants in both studies, 318 (M:F = 122:196) met the inclusion criteria. Elastography measurements were performed in the right lobe of the liver at depths of 3, 5 and 7 cm. At each depth, five measurements were acquired with the Siemens and Philips scanners and one measurement each with the GE and Toshiba machines.

RESULTS

The Philips (r = 0.58, p < 0.0001) and the GE (r = 0.63, p < 0.0001) scanners showed the strongest correlation of shear wave velocities between Siemens and comparator scanners, at a depth of 5 cm. We found the strongest relationship with Toshiba (software version 6.0) at a depth of 3 cm (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001). Toshiba software version 5.0 did not give satisfactory results. The factors of sex and BMI showed scanner-specific differences in the values measured (p < 0.05). The age of the subjects did not seem to have any effect.

CONCLUSION

With the exception of Toshiba software version 5.0, all of the scanners we tested can be recommended without reservation for comparative ultrasound elastography of the healthy liver at measurement depths of 3 cm up to 5 cm.

摘要

目的

比较 GE LOGIQ E9、飞利浦 EPIQ7 和东芝 Aplio 500(版本 5.0 和 6.0)超声扫描仪的基于 ARFI 的弹性成像程序与西门子 Acuson S3000 参考扫描仪在健康肝脏受试者中的差异,同时考虑各种影响因素。

材料与方法

该研究包括两个后续研究部分。研究 1(n=205)评估了 GE 和东芝 5.0 的 2D-SWE 技术以及飞利浦扫描仪的 pSWE 技术与西门子参考扫描仪的对比。研究 2(n=113)在另一组患者中评估了东芝 6.0 与西门子的对比。在这两项研究的 433 名研究参与者中,有 318 名(男:女=122:196)符合纳入标准。弹性成像测量在肝脏右叶的 3、5 和 7cm 深度进行。在每个深度,使用西门子和飞利浦扫描仪采集 5 次测量值,使用 GE 和东芝机器各采集 1 次测量值。

结果

在 5cm 深度处,飞利浦(r=0.58,p<0.0001)和 GE(r=0.63,p<0.0001)扫描仪显示出与西门子和比较扫描仪之间剪切波速度最强的相关性。我们在 3cm 深度处发现与东芝(软件版本 6.0)最强的相关性(r=0.57,p<0.0001)。东芝软件版本 5.0 没有给出满意的结果。性别和 BMI 等因素对测量值有特定的扫描仪差异(p<0.05)。受试者的年龄似乎没有任何影响。

结论

除了东芝软件版本 5.0 之外,我们测试的所有扫描仪都可以毫无保留地推荐用于健康肝脏的 3cm 至 5cm 测量深度的比较超声弹性成像。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验