Medical Physics Complex Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Via dell'Antella 58, 50012, Bagno a Ripoli, Italy.
Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Oncology, IFCA, Florence, Italy.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Mar;195(3):226-235. doi: 10.1007/s00066-018-1383-2. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
The dosimetric variability in spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning was investigated in a large number of centres to identify crowd knowledge-based solutions.
Two spinal cases were planned by 48 planners (38 centres). The required prescription dose (PD) was 3 × 10 Gy and the planning target volume (PTV) coverage request was: V > 90% (minimum request: V > 80%). The dose constraints were: planning risk volume (PRV) spinal cord: V < 0.35 cm, V < 0.03 cm; oesophagus: V < 5 cm, V < 0.03 cm. Planners who did not fulfil the protocol requirements were asked to re-optimize the plans, using the results of planners with the same technology. Statistical analysis was performed to assess correlations between dosimetric results and planning parameters. A quality index (QI) was defined for scoring plans.
In all, 12.5% of plans did not meet the protocol requirements. After re-optimization, 98% of plans fulfilled the constraints, showing the positive impact of knowledge sharing. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation (p < 0.05) between the homogeneity index (HI) and PTV coverage for both cases, while the correlation between HI and spinal cord sparing was significant only for the single dorsal PTV case. Moreover, the multileaf collimator leaf thickness correlated with the spinal cord sparing. Planners using comparable delivery/planning system techniques produced different QI, highlighting the impact of the planner's skills in the optimization process.
Both the technology and the planner's skills are fundamentally important in spine SBRT planning optimization. Knowledge sharing helped to follow the plan objectives.
为了确定基于人群知识的解决方案,在大量中心研究了脊柱立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)计划中的剂量学变异性。
由 48 名规划师(38 个中心)规划了两个脊柱病例。要求的处方剂量(PD)为 3×10Gy,计划靶区(PTV)覆盖要求为:V>90%(最小要求:V>80%)。剂量约束为:计划风险体积(PRV)脊髓:V<0.35cm3,V<0.03cm3;食管:V<5cm3,V<0.03cm3。未满足方案要求的规划师被要求使用具有相同技术的规划师的结果重新优化计划。进行了统计分析,以评估剂量学结果与计划参数之间的相关性。定义了一个质量指数(QI)来对计划进行评分。
在所有病例中,有 12.5%的计划未满足方案要求。经过重新优化,98%的计划满足了约束条件,表明了知识共享的积极影响。统计分析显示,两个病例的均匀性指数(HI)与 PTV 覆盖之间存在显著相关性(p<0.05),而 HI 与脊髓保护之间的相关性仅在单个背侧 PTV 病例中显著。此外,多叶准直器叶片厚度与脊髓保护相关。使用可比的递送/计划系统技术的规划师产生了不同的 QI,突出了规划师在优化过程中的技能的影响。
技术和规划师的技能在脊柱 SBRT 计划优化中都至关重要。知识共享有助于遵循计划目标。