Nurmi Sanna-Maria, Kangasniemi Mari, Halkoaho Arja, Pietilä Anna-Maija
1 University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
2 Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Feb;14(1):33-48. doi: 10.1177/1556264618805643. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
With changes in clinical research practice, the importance of a study-subject's privacy and the confidentiality of their personal data is growing. However, the body of research is fragmented, and a synthesis of work in this area is lacking. Accordingly, an integrative review was performed, guided by Whittemore and Knafl's work. Data from PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL searches from January 2012 to February 2017 were analyzed via the constant comparison method. From 16 empirical and theoretical studies, six topical aspects were identified: the evolving nature of health data in clinical research, sharing of health data, the challenges of anonymizing data, collaboration among stakeholders, the complexity of regulation, and ethics-related tension between social benefits and privacy. Study subjects' privacy is an increasingly important ethics principle for clinical research, and privacy protection is rendered even more challenging by changing research practice.
随着临床研究实践的变化,研究对象的隐私及其个人数据的保密性变得越来越重要。然而,这方面的研究较为零散,缺乏对该领域工作的综合总结。因此,我们以惠特莫尔和克纳夫的研究为指导,进行了一项综合综述。通过常数比较法,对2012年1月至2017年2月期间来自PubMed、Scopus和CINAHL数据库检索的数据进行了分析。从16项实证研究和理论研究中,确定了六个主题方面:临床研究中健康数据的不断演变的性质、健康数据的共享、数据匿名化的挑战、利益相关者之间的合作、监管的复杂性以及社会利益与隐私之间与伦理相关的紧张关系。研究对象的隐私是临床研究中一项日益重要的伦理原则,而研究实践的变化使隐私保护面临更大挑战。