1MS-Nutrition,13385 Marseille cedex 5,France.
2Nestlé Research Center,Vers-chez-les-Blanc CP 44,1000 Lausanne 26,Switzerland.
Br J Nutr. 2018 Nov;120(9):1056-1064. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518002490.
The Nestlé Nutritional Profiling System (NNPS) has been developed to guide food and beverage reformulation. The WHO published guidelines to develop and validate nutrient profiling systems. The objective was to conduct validation tests of the NNPS following principles of the WHO guidelines. French (Individual and National Survey on food Consumption 2006-2007) and the USA (National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2011-2012) nationally representative dietary surveys were used. NNPS outcomes (PASS, FAIL, out-of-scope) of foods were compared with the validated UK Ofcom nutrient profiling system outcomes. Contributions of NNPS outcomes to energy intakes were compared between diets nutritional quality classes defined by two methods: based on a food-based quality indicator (Programme National Nutrition Santé Guideline Score in France, Healthy Eating Index 2010 in the USA) or on a combination of three nutrient-based indicators (mean adequacy ratio, mean excess ratio and energy density). In both countries, food items with a NNPS FAIL outcome had a lower nutritional quality according to the UK Ofcom, with an overall agreement between the two systems of 75·7 % in France and 68·8 % in the USA. In both countries, a high (respectively, low) contribution of NNPS PASS (respectively, NNPS FAIL) was positively associated with diet healthiness. Absolute associations were stronger between the contribution of NNPS FAIL products and measures of diet healthiness. Foods and beverages reaching NNPS standards appeared to have a higher nutritional quality and would be more likely to contribute to healthier diets, mainly linked to a reduction of nutrients to limit.
雀巢营养成分分类系统(NNPS)旨在指导食品和饮料的配方改良。世界卫生组织发布了制定和验证营养成分分类系统的指南。目的是根据世界卫生组织的原则对 NNPS 进行验证测试。本研究使用了具有代表性的法国(2006-2007 年个人和国家食物消费调查)和美国(2011-2012 年全国健康和营养调查)的国家饮食调查数据。将食品的 NNPS 结果(通过、不通过、不在范围内)与经过验证的英国通讯管理局营养成分分类系统结果进行比较。根据两种方法(法国的基于食物质量指标[国家营养健康计划指南评分],美国的健康饮食指数 2010)或基于三个基于营养素的指标(平均充足率、平均过量率和能量密度)定义的饮食营养质量等级,比较 NNPS 结果对能量摄入的贡献。在这两个国家,根据英国通讯管理局的标准,NNPS 结果为不通过的食物项目的营养质量较低,法国和美国的两个系统之间的总体一致性为 75.7%和 68.8%。在这两个国家,NNPS 通过的食物(分别为 NNPS 不通过的食物)的高(低)贡献与饮食健康度呈正相关。NNPS 不通过产品的绝对相关性与饮食健康度的衡量标准之间更强。达到 NNPS 标准的食品和饮料似乎具有更高的营养价值,更有可能有助于更健康的饮食,主要与限制营养素的摄入量有关。