Suppr超能文献

以家庭为中心的小儿麻醉诱导方法的益处。

Benefits of a family-centered approach to pediatric induction of anesthesia.

作者信息

Luehmann Natalie C, Staubach Michelle E, Akay Begum, Collier Phillip J, Han Richard E, Riggs Thomas W, Novotny Nathan M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI.

Department of Child Life Services, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jan;54(1):189-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: We initiated a pediatric surgical program including a caregiver for the induction of anesthesia. We measured preoperative midazolam administration, preoperative time, induction time, and program satisfaction.

METHODS

Families with children undergoing surgery during the study period were included. Preoperative midazolam administration, preoperative time, and induction time were compared between participants and controls. Satisfaction surveys were given to participating caregivers and staff.

RESULTS

The rate of preoperative midazolam use decreased from 41% (392/964) to 13% (16/118) among participants vs controls (p < 0.0001). After linear regression analysis, this difference persisted as an adjusted odds ratio of 0.29 (95% CI = 0.16-0.52). Preoperative and induction times (minutes) were similar between groups (76.2 vs 82.2, 13.8 vs 16.2, p = nonsignificant). Based on 5-point Likert surveys, the program was rated as "beneficial" or "very beneficial" to the patient by caregivers (99.2%) and staff (77.5%). Caregivers stated it "reduced" or "greatly reduced" anxiety for them (87.1%) and their child (93.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Opponents of similar programs suggest familial presence slows care and is disruptive. Our program decreased utilization of preoperative anxiolytics with no effect on operating room efficiency. Both hospital staff and participants felt the program was beneficial to the patient. Perceived caregiver and child anxiety was reduced.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

背景/目的:我们启动了一个儿科手术项目,其中包括一名负责麻醉诱导的护理人员。我们测量了术前咪达唑仑的使用情况、术前时间、诱导时间以及项目满意度。

方法

纳入研究期间接受手术的患儿家庭。比较参与者和对照组术前咪达唑仑的使用情况、术前时间和诱导时间。对参与的护理人员和工作人员进行满意度调查。

结果

与对照组相比,参与者术前咪达唑仑的使用率从41%(392/964)降至13%(16/118)(p<0.0001)。线性回归分析后,这种差异持续存在,调整后的优势比为0.29(95%置信区间=0.16 - 0.52)。两组之间的术前和诱导时间(分钟)相似(76.2对82.2,13.8对16.2,p=无显著差异)。根据5分制李克特量表调查,护理人员(99.2%)和工作人员(77.5%)将该项目评为对患者“有益”或“非常有益”。护理人员表示该项目“减轻”或“大大减轻”了他们(87.1%)和孩子(93.2%)的焦虑。

结论

类似项目的反对者认为家属在场会减缓护理速度并造成干扰。我们的项目降低了术前抗焦虑药物的使用率,且对手术室效率没有影响。医院工作人员和参与者都认为该项目对患者有益。护理人员和孩子的焦虑感有所减轻。

研究类型

治疗研究。

证据级别

三级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验