Velayos María, Estefanía Karla, Álvarez María, Sarmiento María C, Moratilla Lucas, Sanabria Pascual, Hernández Francisco, López Santamaría Manuel V
Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid 28046, Spain.
Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación Infantil, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid 28046, Spain.
World J Clin Pediatr. 2021 Nov 9;10(6):159-167. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v10.i6.159.
Surgical intervention is usually a traumatic event that causes stress and anxiety in the pediatric patient and the family environment. To reduce the harmful effects of presurgical anxiety, parental presence during induction of anesthesia (PPIA) is one of the more notable interventions used in medical centers. However, data on this measure are difficult to evaluate and often face resistance from healthcare staff.
To analyze the perception of the healthcare workers after the implementation of a PPIA program.
A survey was developed and sent by email to all the healthcare staff working in the children's area of a tertiary hospital. It consisted of 14 items divided into positive aspects of PPIA and negative aspects of PPIA evaluated with the use of a Likert scale (1 to 5). The demographics of the respondents were included in the data collected. The answers to the questions were interpreted through the Net Promoter Score (NPS). The statistical analysis compared the differences in the responses to each question of the survey made by the different groups of health personnel included.
A total of 141 surveys were sent out, with a response rate of 69%. Of the total number of responses, 68% were from women and 32% from men. The average age of the participants was 42.3 ± 10.6 years. As for the positive questions about the PPIA, 83% had an NPS > 50, and only one had a score between 0 and 50, which means that the quality of the service was rated as excellent or good by 100% of the respondents. On the other hand, 100% of the negative questions about the PPIA had a negative NPS. Responses to the question "PPIA increases patient safety" were significantly different ( = 0.037), with a lower percentage of pediatric surgeons (70%) thinking that PPIA increased patient safety, compared with anesthesiologists (90%), nursing (92%), and other medical personnel (96%).
The personnel who participated in the PPIA program at our center were in favor of implementation. There were no validated arguments to support worker resistance to the development of the PPIA.
手术干预通常是一个创伤性事件,会给儿科患者及其家庭环境带来压力和焦虑。为减少术前焦虑的有害影响,麻醉诱导期家长陪伴(PPIA)是医疗中心采用的较为显著的干预措施之一。然而,关于这一措施的数据难以评估,且常遭医护人员抵制。
分析实施PPIA项目后医护人员的看法。
设计了一项调查问卷,并通过电子邮件发送给一家三级医院儿童科室的所有医护人员。问卷包含14个项目,分为PPIA的积极方面和消极方面,采用李克特量表(1至5)进行评估。收集的数据中包含了受访者的人口统计学信息。通过净推荐值(NPS)对问题的答案进行解读。统计分析比较了不同组别的医护人员对调查问卷中每个问题的回答差异。
共发出141份调查问卷,回复率为69%。在所有回复中,68%来自女性,32%来自男性。参与者的平均年龄为42.3±10.6岁。关于PPIA的积极问题,83%的净推荐值大于50,只有一个得分在0至50之间,这意味着100%的受访者将服务质量评为优秀或良好。另一方面,关于PPIA的消极问题,100%的净推荐值为负。对于“PPIA提高患者安全性”这一问题的回答存在显著差异(P = 0.037),认为PPIA提高患者安全性的儿科外科医生比例(70%)低于麻醉医生(90%)、护士(92%)和其他医务人员(96%)。
我们中心参与PPIA项目的人员支持该项目的实施。没有经过验证的论据支持工作人员抵制PPIA的开展。