• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手和目标位置的视觉反馈并不能解释适应后直线运动的趋势。

Visual feedback of hand and target location does not explain the tendency for straight adapted reaches.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0206116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206116. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0206116
PMID:30356285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6200239/
Abstract

Subjects in laboratory settings exhibit straight hand paths-typified by the minimum jerk path-even in the presence of a learned but disturbing force field. At the same time it is known that in this setting, visual feedback strongly influences reaches, biasing them to be straight. Here we examine whether or not this bias can account for the straightness of movements made in a force field. We ran three curl field experiments to investigate how the lack of visual feedback influences adapted reaches. In a first experiment, hand position was displayed at the beginning and at the end of each trial, but extinguished during movement, and the hand was passively brought back to the home location. In the second experiment, visual feedback of neither the hand nor the target was provided, and targets were haptically rendered as "dimples." In order to provide extended practice, a third experiment was run with a single target and an active reach back to the home location. In all three cases we found minor changes in the adapted reaches relative to control groups that had full visual feedback. Our subjects adopted trajectories that were better explained by minimum jerk paths over those that minimize effort. The results indicate that for point-to-point reaching movements the visual feedback, or lack there of, cannot explain why reaches appear to be straight, even after adapting to a perturbing force field.

摘要

在实验室环境中,即使存在经过学习但令人困扰的力场,实验对象也会表现出直线手路径——以最小冲击路径为典型特征。与此同时,人们知道在这种环境下,视觉反馈强烈影响着伸手动作,使它们偏向直线。在这里,我们研究了这种偏差是否可以解释在力场中进行的运动的直线性。我们进行了三个卷曲力场实验,以调查在缺乏视觉反馈的情况下,适应伸手的影响。在第一个实验中,手的位置在每次试验的开始和结束时显示,但在运动过程中熄灭,手被被动地带回起始位置。在第二个实验中,既不提供手的视觉反馈,也不提供目标的视觉反馈,目标则通过触觉呈现为“酒窝”。为了提供更多的练习,我们进行了第三个实验,使用单个目标和主动回到起始位置的伸手动作。在所有三种情况下,我们发现与具有完整视觉反馈的对照组相比,适应伸手的变化较小。我们的实验对象采用了更能解释最小冲击路径的轨迹,而不是最小努力路径。结果表明,对于点对点伸手动作,即使在适应了干扰力场之后,视觉反馈或缺乏视觉反馈也不能解释为什么伸手动作看起来是直线的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/b6fa08144c0b/pone.0206116.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/30e65c7888e8/pone.0206116.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/57717cdd2a2d/pone.0206116.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/736d8576279a/pone.0206116.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/8d2ba3e6e7c7/pone.0206116.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/88529c55e385/pone.0206116.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/6cf496a95436/pone.0206116.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/b6fa08144c0b/pone.0206116.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/30e65c7888e8/pone.0206116.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/57717cdd2a2d/pone.0206116.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/736d8576279a/pone.0206116.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/8d2ba3e6e7c7/pone.0206116.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/88529c55e385/pone.0206116.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/6cf496a95436/pone.0206116.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/6200239/b6fa08144c0b/pone.0206116.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Visual feedback of hand and target location does not explain the tendency for straight adapted reaches.手和目标位置的视觉反馈并不能解释适应后直线运动的趋势。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0206116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206116. eCollection 2018.
2
Planned Straight or Biased to Be So? The Influence of Visual Feedback on Reaching Movements.是有意保持直线还是偏向直线?视觉反馈对伸手动作的影响。
J Mot Behav. 2020;52(2):236-248. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2019.1609409. Epub 2019 May 20.
3
The effect of visuomotor adaptation on proprioceptive localization: the contributions of perceptual and motor changes.视觉运动适应对本体感觉定位的影响:感知和运动变化的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jul;232(7):2073-86. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3896-y. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
4
When adaptive control fails: Slow recovery of reduced rapid online control during reaching under reversed vision.当适应性控制失效时:在反向视觉下伸手过程中,降低的快速在线控制恢复缓慢。
Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):155-65. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.021. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
5
Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements.人类伸手动作适应过程中视觉与本体感觉反馈的相互作用。
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jun;93(6):3200-13. doi: 10.1152/jn.00947.2004. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
6
Adaptation to proprioceptive targets following visuomotor adaptation.视觉运动适应后对本体感觉目标的适应。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Feb;236(2):419-432. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5141-y. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
7
Force field adaptation can be learned using vision in the absence of proprioceptive error.力场适应可以在没有本体感觉误差的情况下通过视觉学习。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011 Jun;19(3):298-306. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2125990.
8
Sensory recalibration of hand position following visuomotor adaptation.手在视觉运动适应后位置感觉的重新校准。
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3505-18. doi: 10.1152/jn.00514.2009. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
9
The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space.在不受限制地伸向对侧和同侧视觉空间中的目标时眼睛和肢体运动的组织。
Exp Brain Res. 1985;60(1):159-78. doi: 10.1007/BF00237028.
10
Eye-hand coordination during visuomotor adaptation: effects of hemispace and joint coordination.视觉运动适应过程中的眼手协调:半空间和关节协调的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Dec;235(12):3645-3661. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5088-z. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of online visual feedback on motor acquisition and retention when learning to reach in a force field.在线视觉反馈对在力场中学习伸手动作时运动技能习得与保持的影响。
Neuroscience. 2016 Nov 19;337:267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
2
Sensory Agreement Guides Kinetic Energy Optimization of Arm Movements during Object Manipulation.感觉一致性指导物体操作过程中手臂运动的动能优化。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 1;12(4):e1004861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004861. eCollection 2016 Apr.
3
Deep networks for motor control functions.
用于运动控制功能的深度网络。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2015 Mar 19;9:32. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2015.00032. eCollection 2015.
4
The effects of training breadth on motor generalization.训练广度对运动泛化的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Dec 1;112(11):2791-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00615.2013. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
5
The cost of moving optimally: kinematic path selection.最优移动的代价:运动路径选择
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Oct 15;112(8):1815-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.00291.2014. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
6
Motor learning of novel dynamics is not represented in a single global coordinate system: evaluation of mixed coordinate representations and local learning.新动力学的运动学习不是在单个全局坐标系中表示的:混合坐标表示和局部学习的评估。
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Mar;111(6):1165-82. doi: 10.1152/jn.00493.2013. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
7
An examination of the generalizability of motor costs.运动成本的可推广性研究。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053759. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
8
Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond.人类感觉运动学习:适应、技能及超越
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Aug;21(4):636-44. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
9
The central nervous system does not minimize energy cost in arm movements.中枢神经系统在手臂运动中不会最小化能量成本。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Dec;104(6):2985-94. doi: 10.1152/jn.00483.2010. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
10
Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom.最优控制可预测人类对具有内部自由度物体的操作表现。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jun;5(6):e1000419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000419. Epub 2009 Jun 26.