Department of Economic Analysis, University of Zaragoza, Gran Vía 2, 50005, Zaragoza, Spain.
San Jorge University, Autovía A-23 Zaragoza-Huesca Km. 299, Villanueva de Gállego, 50830, Zaragoza, Spain.
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Apr;20(3):455-474. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1010-2. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
This paper analyses whether government ideology and other political- and electoral-related factors influence country-level public healthcare expenditures, focussing on the impact of the Great Recession on that relationship. We test this hypothesis for the OECD countries in 1970-2016. Our results reveal the presence of a partisan effect, left-wing governments being more likely to raise public expenditures in the health sector. We also find that coalitions increase these expenditures, whilst minority governments and those with a high presence in the lower house decrease them. Meanwhile, the opportunistic behaviour of incumbents related to the timing of elections is not supported by our results. The percentage of public expenditures over total health expenditures is also examined, obtaining similar results regarding the partisan effect. However, the onset of the Great Recession has altered these relationships, neutralizing the impact of political factors.
本文分析了政府意识形态和其他政治及选举相关因素是否会影响国家层面的公共医疗支出,重点关注大衰退对这种关系的影响。我们在 1970 年至 2016 年的经合组织国家中检验了这一假设。我们的研究结果表明存在党派效应,即左翼政府更有可能增加医疗保健领域的公共支出。我们还发现,联盟政府会增加这些支出,而少数派政府和在下议院中席位较高的政府则会减少这些支出。同时,我们的研究结果也不支持关于选举时机的机会主义行为会影响政府的观点。我们还考察了公共支出占总医疗支出的百分比,在党派效应方面也得到了类似的结果。然而,大衰退的爆发改变了这些关系,使政治因素的影响趋于中性。