• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对2019冠状病毒病的应对:治理、医疗保健基础设施的作用以及从过往大流行中吸取的经验教训。

Responses to COVID-19: The role of governance, healthcare infrastructure, and learning from past pandemics.

作者信息

Sharma Amalesh, Borah Sourav Bikash, Moses Aditya C

机构信息

Mays Business School, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, India.

出版信息

J Bus Res. 2021 Jan;122:597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.011
PMID:33518844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7834581/
Abstract

The ongoing COVID-19 outbreak has revealed vulnerabilities in global healthcare responses. Research in epidemiology has focused on understanding the effects of countries' responses on COVID-19 spread. While a growing body of research has focused on understanding the role of macro-level factors on responses to COVID-19, we have a limited understanding of what drives countries' responses to COVID-19. We lean on organizational learning theory and the extant literature on rare events to propose that governance structure, investment in healthcare infrastructure, and learning from past pandemics influence a country's response regarding reactive and proactive strategies. With data collected from various sources and using an empirical methodology, we find that centralized governance positively affects reactive strategies, while healthcare infrastructure and learning from past pandemics positively influence proactive and reactive strategies. This research contributes to the literature on learning, pandemics, and rare events.

摘要

持续的新冠疫情暴露出全球医疗应对方面的薄弱环节。流行病学研究聚焦于了解各国应对措施对新冠病毒传播的影响。虽然越来越多的研究致力于理解宏观层面因素在应对新冠疫情中的作用,但我们对推动各国应对新冠疫情的因素了解有限。我们借助组织学习理论和关于罕见事件的现有文献,提出治理结构、医疗基础设施投资以及从过去疫情中吸取的经验教训会影响一个国家在应对策略和主动策略方面的应对措施。通过从各种来源收集数据并采用实证方法,我们发现集中式治理对应对策略有积极影响,而医疗基础设施以及从过去疫情中吸取的经验教训对主动和应对策略均有积极影响。本研究为有关学习、疫情和罕见事件的文献做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b412/7834581/ab7349cb63b9/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b412/7834581/0c1e48eb50c1/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b412/7834581/ab7349cb63b9/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b412/7834581/0c1e48eb50c1/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b412/7834581/ab7349cb63b9/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Responses to COVID-19: The role of governance, healthcare infrastructure, and learning from past pandemics.对2019冠状病毒病的应对:治理、医疗保健基础设施的作用以及从过往大流行中吸取的经验教训。
J Bus Res. 2021 Jan;122:597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
COVID-19 Outbreak, Mitigation, and Governance in High Prevalent Countries.高流行国家的 COVID-19 爆发、缓解和治理。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Sep 17;86(1):119. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3011.
3
The Impact of the Organization of Public Health Systems on the Ability of Countries to Resist the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experience of Developed Countries of the World and Ukraine.公共卫生系统组织对各国抵御 COVID-19 大流行能力的影响:世界发达国家和乌克兰的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 12;20(12):6106. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126106.
4
COVID-19 in conflict region: the arab levant response.新冠疫情在冲突地区:阿拉伯黎凡特的应对。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;21(1):1590. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11580-4.
5
Everyday capabilities were a path to resilience during COVID-19: a case study of five countries.日常能力是应对 COVID-19 期间韧性的途径:五个国家的案例研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Feb 13;38(2):192-204. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac085.
6
Multi-dimensional resilience: A quantitative exploration of disease outcomes and economic, political, and social resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic in six countries.多维韧性:对六个国家 COVID-19 大流行期间疾病结果以及经济、政治和社会韧性的定量探索。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 5;18(1):e0279894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279894. eCollection 2023.
7
The level of countries' preparedness to health risks during Covid-19 and pre-pandemic: the differential response to health systems building blocks and socioeconomic indicators.新冠疫情期间及大流行之前各国对健康风险的防范水平:对卫生系统组成要素和社会经济指标的差异化应对。
Health Econ Rev. 2023 Mar 14;13(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00428-9.
8
Analyzing COVID-19 pandemic for unequal distribution of tests, identified cases, deaths, and fatality rates in the top 18 countries.分析新冠疫情在18个主要国家中检测、确诊病例、死亡病例及死亡率的不平等分布情况。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):953-961. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.051. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
9
Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic for future epidemics and pandemics preparedness and response in Guinea: Findings from a scoping review.从 COVID-19 大流行中汲取教训,为几内亚未来的疫情和大流行防范与应对做准备:来自范围综述的研究结果。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;10:879850. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.879850. eCollection 2022.
10
COVID-19 vaccination and governance in the case of low, middle and high-income countries.新冠病毒疫苗接种和低、中、高收入国家的治理。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 5;23(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15975-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective study using artificial neural networks for identification of high-risk COVID-19 patients.使用人工神经网络识别高危COVID-19患者的前瞻性研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 23;15(1):18005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00925-3.
2
Pakistan's national COVID-19 response: lessons from an emergent response to the pandemic.巴基斯坦的国家 COVID-19 应对措施:从对大流行的紧急应对中吸取的教训。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 5;12:1379867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1379867. eCollection 2024.
3
Singapore's COVID-19 crisis decision-making through centralization, legitimacy, and agility: an empirical analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
A novel comprehensive metric to assess effectiveness of COVID-19 testing: Inter-country comparison and association with geography, government, and policy response.一种评估 COVID-19 检测效果的新综合指标:国家间比较及其与地理位置、政府和政策应对的关联。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):e0248176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248176. eCollection 2021.
2
Covid-19's impact on supply chain decisions: Strategic insights from NASDAQ 100 firms using Twitter data.新冠疫情对供应链决策的影响:利用推特数据从纳斯达克100强公司得出的战略见解。
J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.035. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Gender equity and public health outcomes: The COVID-19 experience.
新加坡通过集权、合法性与灵活性进行新冠疫情危机决策:一项实证分析
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Jul 8;49:101137. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101137. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
A Low-Cost Wearable Device to Estimate Body Temperature Based on Wrist Temperature.基于腕部温度的低成本可穿戴设备来估计体温。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Mar 18;24(6):1944. doi: 10.3390/s24061944.
5
Governance and Public Health Decision-Making During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.新冠疫情期间的治理与公共卫生决策:一项范围综述
Public Health Rev. 2024 Feb 16;45:1606095. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1606095. eCollection 2024.
6
A blueprint for learning: How NHS England (London) learned during its response to the Covid-19 pandemic.一份学习蓝图:英国国家医疗服务体系(伦敦)在应对新冠疫情期间的学习历程。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Feb 7;7:100475. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100475. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
COVID-19 in Pakistan: A national analysis of five pandemic waves.巴基斯坦的 COVID-19 疫情:五次大流行浪潮的国家分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 29;18(12):e0281326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281326. eCollection 2023.
8
The management of healthcare employees' job satisfaction: optimization analyses from a series of large-scale surveys.医疗保健员工工作满意度的管理:基于一系列大规模调查的优化分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 3;23(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09426-3.
9
Modeling the artificial intelligence-based imperatives of industry 5.0 towards resilient supply chains: A post-COVID-19 pandemic perspective.从新冠疫情后视角看基于人工智能的工业5.0对弹性供应链的要求建模
Comput Ind Eng. 2023 Mar;177:109055. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109055. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
10
Development and validation of the regarding infection prevention and control among environmental service workers on knowledge, attitudes, practise, and experience questionnaire.针对环境服务工作者的感染预防和控制知识、态度、实践和经验问卷的编制与验证。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;10:1062199. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1062199. eCollection 2022.
性别平等与公共卫生成果:新冠疫情的经验
J Bus Res. 2020 Aug;116:193-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.031. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
Managing uncertainty during a global pandemic: An international business perspective.在全球大流行期间应对不确定性:国际商务视角
J Bus Res. 2020 Aug;116:188-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.026. Epub 2020 May 25.
5
Compensating for the 'Authoritarian Advantage' in Crisis Response: A Comparative Case Study of SARS Pandemic Responses in China and Taiwan.应对危机中弥补“威权优势”:中国大陆与台湾地区应对非典疫情的比较案例研究
J Chin Polit Sci. 2012;17(3):313-331. doi: 10.1007/s11366-012-9204-4. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
6
Review of the Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的临床特征综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1545-1549. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05762-w. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics, New Technology, and Proactive Testing.台湾对COVID-19的应对:大数据分析、新技术与主动检测
JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1341-1342. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3151.
8
Responding to Covid-19 - A Once-in-a-Century Pandemic?应对新冠疫情——一场百年一遇的大流行病?
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1677-1679. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2003762. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
9
Do political factors influence public health expenditures? Evidence pre- and post-great recession.政治因素是否会影响公共卫生支出?大衰退前后的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Apr;20(3):455-474. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1010-2. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
10
Challenges to Healthcare in India - The Five A's.印度医疗保健面临的挑战——五个“A”。
Indian J Community Med. 2018 Jul-Sep;43(3):141-143. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_194_18.