• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5 年内提高三级大学医院手卫生依从性的干预措施:信息、培训和反馈的迭代过程。

Interventions to increase hand hygiene compliance in a tertiary university hospital over a period of 5 years: An iterative process of information, training and feedback.

机构信息

Executive Department for Quality and Risk Management, University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria.

Research Unit for Safety in Health, c/o Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2019 Mar;28(5-6):912-919. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14703. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.14703
PMID:30357973
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

To explore whether an iterative process of information and training paired with a feedback system to observed healthcare professionals and the respective management improves hand hygiene (HH) compliance.

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated infections are a major risk for patient safety, and adherence to the "My five moments" (M5M) for HH varies significantly within organisations as well as within healthcare professional groups. Identified barriers in a baseline survey revealed the need of more information, training, repetitive compliance measurements and feedback to all healthcare professionals.

DESIGN

A quality improvement project using the method of direct observation of healthcare professionals in nonsurgical and surgical wards.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2017, 6,009 healthcare professionals were informed and trained, and HH compliance measurements were performed by hygiene experts. Compliance measurement results were documented in an online tool to give an immediate feedback to observed healthcare professionals. Additionally, a report was forwarded to the management of the respective department to raise awareness. Compliance rates per year were descriptively summarised. The research and reporting methodology followed SQUIRE 2.0.

RESULTS

In total, 84 compliance measurements with 19,295 "M5M for HH" were observed in 49 wards. Overall, mean HH compliance increased from 81.9 ± 5.2% in 2013 to 94.0 ± 3.6% in 2017. Physicians' HH compliance rate improved from 69.0 ± 16.6% to 89.3 ± 6.6%, that of nurses from 86.0 ± 6.9% to 96.4 ± 3.1%, and that of others from 60.5 ± 27.9% to 83.8 ± 20.2%. All M5M for HH (#1-#5) increased over the study period (#1: +16.9%; #2: +20.5%; #3: +7.6%; #4: +5.9%; #5: +12.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrated that an iterative process of information, training, observation and feedback over a period of 5 years can be successful in increasing HH compliance. Positive trends were observed for HH compliance rates across all healthcare professional groups as well as for all M5M for HH.

摘要

目的

探索信息和培训的迭代过程,加上对医护人员和相应管理层的观察反馈系统,是否能提高手卫生(HH)依从性。

背景

医疗保健相关感染是患者安全的主要风险,医疗机构内以及医护人员群体内部的 HH 依从性“五个时刻”(M5M)差异很大。基线调查中发现的障碍表明,所有医护人员都需要更多的信息、培训、反复的依从性测量和反馈。

设计

使用直接观察非手术和手术病房医护人员的方法进行质量改进项目。

方法

在 2013 年至 2017 年间,共有 6009 名医护人员接受了告知和培训,HH 依从性测量由卫生专家进行。依从性测量结果记录在在线工具中,以便立即向被观察的医护人员反馈。此外,还向相关部门管理层提交了一份报告,以提高他们的意识。每年的依从率进行描述性总结。研究和报告方法遵循 SQUIRE 2.0 标准。

结果

共进行了 84 次依从性测量,观察了 49 个病房的 19295 次“HH 的五个时刻”。总体而言,HH 依从率从 2013 年的 81.9±5.2%提高到 2017 年的 94.0±3.6%。医生的 HH 依从率从 69.0±16.6%提高到 89.3±6.6%,护士的依从率从 86.0±6.9%提高到 96.4±3.1%,其他人员的依从率从 60.5±27.9%提高到 83.8±20.2%。所有 M5M(#1-#5)在研究期间均有所增加(#1:+16.9%;#2:+20.5%;#3:+7.6%;#4:+5.9%;#5:+12.7%)。

结论

结果表明,在 5 年的时间里,通过信息、培训、观察和反馈的迭代过程,可以成功提高 HH 依从性。所有医护人员群体以及所有 M5M 的 HH 依从率都呈现出积极的趋势。

相似文献

1
Interventions to increase hand hygiene compliance in a tertiary university hospital over a period of 5 years: An iterative process of information, training and feedback.5 年内提高三级大学医院手卫生依从性的干预措施:信息、培训和反馈的迭代过程。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Mar;28(5-6):912-919. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14703. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
2
A multifaceted hand hygiene improvement program on the intensive care units of the National Referral Hospital of Indonesia in Jakarta.印度尼西亚雅加达国家转诊医院重症监护病房的多方面手卫生改进计划。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Jun 3;8:93. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0540-4. eCollection 2019.
3
Do wearable alcohol-based handrub dispensers increase hand hygiene compliance? - a mixed-methods study.可穿戴酒精基手部免洗液分配器是否能提高手部卫生依从性?——一项混合方法研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Nov 23;7:143. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0439-5. eCollection 2018.
4
[A multimodal strategy to improve adherence to hand hygiene in a university hospital].[一种提高大学医院手部卫生依从性的多模式策略]
Rev Calid Asist. 2017 Jan-Feb;32(1):50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
5
Impact of a hospital-wide hand hygiene initiative on healthcare-associated infections: results of an interrupted time series.医院范围的手卫生倡议对医源性感染的影响:一项中断时间序列研究的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21(12):1019-26. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000800. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
6
A multimodal intervention to improve hand hygiene compliance in a tertiary care center.多模式干预以提高三级保健中心的手卫生依从性。
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Jul;46(7):775-780. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.12.017. Epub 2018 May 9.
7
Implementation of the WHO hand hygiene strategy in Faranah regional hospital, Guinea.在几内亚法拉纳地区医院实施世卫组织手部卫生战略。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 May 14;9(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00723-8.
8
A multimodal intervention to improve hand hygiene compliance in peripheral wards of a tertiary care university centre: a cluster randomised controlled trial.多模式干预提高三级大学中心外周病房手卫生依从性:一项整群随机对照试验。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jul 18;9(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00776-9.
9
Improving hand hygiene practices in two regional hospitals in Kenya using a continuous quality improvement (CQI) approach.采用持续质量改进(CQI)方法改善肯尼亚两家地区医院的手卫生习惯。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Apr 4;11(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01093-z.
10
Impact of direct hand hygiene observations and feedback on hand hygiene compliance among nurses and doctors in medical and surgical wards: an eight-year observational study.直接观察和反馈对手卫生依从性的影响:一项八年观察性研究,涉及医疗和外科病房的护士和医生。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Sep;127:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a training strategy on improving compliance of hand hygiene and gloving during the placement of a short peripheral venous catheter: the multicentre study CleanHand4.培训策略对改善外周短导管置管过程中手部卫生和手套佩戴依从性的影响:多中心研究 CleanHand4。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):731. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04727-x.
2
Process Evaluation of an Acute-Care Nurse-Centred Hand Hygiene Intervention in US Hospitals.美国医院以急性护理护士为中心的手卫生干预措施的过程评价。
Eval Rev. 2024 Aug;48(4):663-691. doi: 10.1177/0193841X231197253. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
3
Speaking up about patient safety concerns: view of nursing students.
护士学生对患者安全问题的看法:直言不讳。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 19;22(1):1547. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08935-x.
4
Audit and feedback as a tool to increase compliance with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) screening and decrease CPE transmission in the hospital.审核和反馈作为一种工具,以提高耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科(CPE)筛查的合规性,并降低医院内 CPE 的传播。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Nov;44(11):1788-1792. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.224. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Traffic safety knowledge gain of ambulance drivers after simulator-based training.基于模拟器的培训后救护车司机交通安全知识的获得。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03279-w.
6
Ways in which healthcare interior environments are associated with perceived safety against infectious diseases and coping behaviours.医疗保健内部环境与对传染病的感知安全性及应对行为相关联的方式。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Sep;106(1):107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.06.022. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
7
Hand hygiene compliance in intensive care units: An observational study.重症监护病房的手卫生依从性:一项观察性研究。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):e12789. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12789. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Deployment of Critical Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in public Styrian hospitals: a five year perspective.在施蒂里亚州公立医院部署关键事件报告系统(CIRS):五年展望。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4265-0.