Casini Silvia
Nuncius. 2017;32(2):440-71.
This article examines visual practices inside the laboratory and in the arts, highlighting a problem of reductionism in the transformation from data to images and in the visual incarnation of the neuro-realism fallacy, that is the extreme images of brain scan. Neurosciences are not inherently reductionist. John R. Mallard’s work around data visualisation problems in the development of biomedical imaging shows how scientists themselves can be attentive to the construction of visual practices and their meaning. If neuro-realism is a fallacy within the neurosciences, are art-neuroscience collaborative projects reproducing this fallacy at visual level? The article analysis how neuroscience-art projects can enable us (or not) to foster and maintain a stereoscopic vision in the way in which we approach the conundrum of what it is like to be both a biological organism made up of molecules, neurons, cells, and an entity equipped with intentionality, desires, thoughts, values.
本文考察了实验室和艺术领域中的视觉实践,着重指出了在从数据到图像的转换过程以及神经现实主义谬误(即脑部扫描的极端图像)的视觉体现中存在的还原论问题。神经科学本身并非本质上就是还原论的。约翰·R·马拉德在生物医学成像发展过程中围绕数据可视化问题所做的工作表明,科学家自身能够如何关注视觉实践的构建及其意义。如果神经现实主义在神经科学领域是一种谬误,那么神经科学与艺术的合作项目是否在视觉层面重现了这一谬误呢?本文分析了神经科学与艺术的项目如何(或无法)使我们在面对既是由分子、神经元、细胞构成的生物有机体,又是具备意向性、欲望、思想、价值观的实体这一难题时,培养并保持一种立体的视角。