• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相 I 型障碍患者与双相 II 型障碍患者后代的精神病理学差异:一项横断面研究。

Differences in Psychopathology between Offspring of Parents with Bipolar I Disorder and Those with Bipolar II Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Lee Hyeon-Ah, Kim Ji-Sun, Lee Yeon-Jung, Heo Nam-Hun, Shim Se-Hoon, Kwon Young-Joon

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Cheonan Hospital, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Seoul Hospital, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Dec;15(12):1135-1143. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.10.22.1. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

DOI:10.30773/pi.2018.10.22.1
PMID:30360028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6318491/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in psychopathology between offspring of parents with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and those with bipolar II disorder (BP-II).

METHODS

The sample included 201 offspring between 6 and 17 years of age who had at least one parent with BP-I or BP-II. The offspring were diagnostically evaluated using the Korean Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version. Psychopathology and Clinical characteristics were evaluated, including lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses, depression, and childhood trauma. Lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses were also compared between schoolchildren aged 6 to 11 years and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years.

RESULTS

In lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses, offspring of parents with BP-I had significantly increased risk of developing MDD and BP-I than those with BP-II. Regarding clinical characteristics, ADHD rating scale and childhood trauma scale were significantly higher in offspring of parents with BP-I than that in those with BP-II.

CONCLUSION

The present study supports that BP-I may be etiologically distinct from BP-II by a possible genetic liability. Our findings indicate that additional research related to bipolar offspring is needed to enhance understanding of differences between BP-I and BP-II.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估患有I型双相情感障碍(BP-I)的父母的后代与患有II型双相情感障碍(BP-II)的父母的后代在精神病理学方面的差异。

方法

样本包括201名6至17岁的后代,他们至少有一位父母患有BP-I或BP-II。使用韩国版《儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症评定量表-目前和终生版》对后代进行诊断评估。评估了精神病理学和临床特征,包括终生DSM-5诊断、抑郁和童年创伤。还比较了6至11岁学龄儿童和12至17岁青少年的终生DSM-5诊断。

结果

在终生DSM-5诊断中,患有BP-I的父母的后代患重度抑郁症(MDD)和BP-I的风险比患有BP-II的父母的后代显著增加。关于临床特征,患有BP-I的父母的后代的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)评定量表和童年创伤量表显著高于患有BP-II的父母的后代。

结论

本研究支持BP-I在病因上可能与BP-II不同,存在可能的遗传易感性。我们的研究结果表明,需要进行更多与双相情感障碍后代相关的研究,以加深对BP-I和BP-II之间差异的理解。

相似文献

1
Differences in Psychopathology between Offspring of Parents with Bipolar I Disorder and Those with Bipolar II Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study.双相 I 型障碍患者与双相 II 型障碍患者后代的精神病理学差异:一项横断面研究。
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Dec;15(12):1135-1143. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.10.22.1. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
2
Parents with bipolar disorder: are disease characteristics good predictors of psychopathology in offspring?双相障碍患者的父母:疾病特征是否能很好地预测后代的精神病理学?
Eur Psychiatry. 2013 May;28(4):240-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
3
Longitudinal trajectories of ADHD symptomatology in offspring of parents with bipolar disorder and community controls.双相情感障碍患者后代与社区对照组儿童多动症症状的纵向轨迹
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 May;76(5):599-606. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09095.
4
Psychiatric Disorders and Quality of Life in the Offspring of Parents with Bipolar Disorder.双相情感障碍患者后代的精神疾病与生活质量
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017 Aug;27(6):483-493. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0056. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
5
The Emergent Course of Bipolar Disorder: Observations Over Two Decades From the Canadian High-Risk Offspring Cohort.双相障碍的突发病程:来自加拿大高危后代队列的二十年观察。
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 1;176(9):720-729. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18040461. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
6
The early manifestations of bipolar disorder: a longitudinal prospective study of the offspring of bipolar parents.双相情感障碍的早期表现:一项对双相情感障碍患者后代的纵向前瞻性研究。
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Dec;9(8):828-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00421.x.
7
Psychopathology in the offspring of parents with bipolar disorder: a controlled study.双相情感障碍患者后代的精神病理学:一项对照研究。
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Oct 1;58(7):554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.06.010. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
8
Categorical and dimensional psychopathology in Dutch and US offspring of parents with bipolar disorder: A preliminary cross-national comparison.荷兰和美国双相情感障碍患者后代的分类与维度精神病理学:一项初步的跨国比较。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Nov 15;205:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
9
A high-risk study of bipolar disorder. Childhood clinical phenotypes as precursors of major mood disorders.双相情感障碍的一项高风险研究。儿童期临床表型作为主要情绪障碍的先兆。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;68(10):1012-20. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.126.
10
Lifetime psychopathology in child and adolescent offspring of parents diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: a 2-year follow-up study.父母被诊断患有精神分裂症或双相情感障碍的儿童和青少年后代的终生精神病理学:一项为期 2 年的随访研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;30(1):117-129. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01500-z. Epub 2020 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Bipolar II disorder: a state-of-the-art review.双相II型障碍:最新综述
World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):175-189. doi: 10.1002/wps.21300.
2
Using density of antecedent events and trajectory path analysis to investigate family-correlated patterns of onset of bipolar I disorder: a comparison of cohorts from Europe and USA.利用先行事件密度和轨迹路径分析研究双相I型障碍发病的家族相关模式:欧洲和美国队列的比较。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2021 Oct 1;9(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40345-021-00234-4.
3
Plasma Metabolite Profiles in First Episode Psychosis: Exploring Symptoms Heterogeneity/Severity in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder Cohorts.首发精神病的血浆代谢物谱:探索精神分裂症和双相情感障碍队列中的症状异质性/严重程度
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 5;11:496. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00496. eCollection 2020.
4
Bipolar II Disorder Is NOT a Myth.双相II型障碍并非虚构。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;64(8):537-540. doi: 10.1177/0706743719852096.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening with the Korean Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire for Bipolar Disorders in Adolescents: Korean Validity and Reliability Study.使用青少年双相情感障碍情绪障碍问卷韩国版进行筛查:韩国版效度与信度研究
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2018 Aug 31;16(3):316-323. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2018.16.3.316.
2
Specificity in Etiology of Subtypes of Bipolar Disorder: Evidence From a Swedish Population-Based Family Study.双相障碍亚型病因学的特异性:来自瑞典基于人群的家族研究的证据。
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 1;84(11):810-816. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
3
Evidence for genetic heterogeneity between clinical subtypes of bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍临床亚型之间存在遗传异质性的证据。
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 10;7(1):e993. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.242.
4
Environmental factors, life events, and trauma in the course of bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍病程中的环境因素、生活事件及创伤
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Jan;71(1):6-17. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12433. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
American tertiary clinic-referred bipolar II disorder compared to bipolar I disorder: More severe in multiple ways, but less severe in a few other ways.美国三级诊所转诊的双相情感障碍 II 型与双相情感障碍 I 型相比:在多个方面更严重,但在其他一些方面则较轻。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Dec 1;188:257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
6
Bipolar I and II versus unipolar depression: clinical differences and impulsivity/aggression traits.双相 I 型和 II 型与单相抑郁症:临床差异及冲动/攻击特质
Eur Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;30(1):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
7
Diagnostic validity and reliability of a Korean version of the Parent and Adolescent General Behavior Inventories.《父母与青少年一般行为问卷》韩文版的诊断有效性和可靠性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;55(7):1730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 May 17.
8
Differentiating bipolar I and II disorders and the likely contribution of DSM-5 classification to their cleavage.鉴别双相 I 型和 II 型障碍,以及 DSM-5 分类对其划分的可能贡献。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Jan;152-154:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.006.
9
Independence of familial transmission of mania and depression: results of the NIMH family study of affective spectrum disorders.躁狂症和抑郁症家族传递的独立性:情感谱障碍 NIMH 家庭研究的结果。
Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;19(2):214-9. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.116. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
10
Prevalence, comorbidity and predictors of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents in rural north-eastern Uganda.农村乌干达东北部儿童和青少年焦虑障碍的患病率、共病和预测因素。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2013 Jul 10;7(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-7-21.