Suppr超能文献

双相 I 型障碍患者与双相 II 型障碍患者后代的精神病理学差异:一项横断面研究。

Differences in Psychopathology between Offspring of Parents with Bipolar I Disorder and Those with Bipolar II Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Lee Hyeon-Ah, Kim Ji-Sun, Lee Yeon-Jung, Heo Nam-Hun, Shim Se-Hoon, Kwon Young-Joon

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Cheonan Hospital, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Seoul Hospital, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Dec;15(12):1135-1143. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.10.22.1. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in psychopathology between offspring of parents with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and those with bipolar II disorder (BP-II).

METHODS

The sample included 201 offspring between 6 and 17 years of age who had at least one parent with BP-I or BP-II. The offspring were diagnostically evaluated using the Korean Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version. Psychopathology and Clinical characteristics were evaluated, including lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses, depression, and childhood trauma. Lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses were also compared between schoolchildren aged 6 to 11 years and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years.

RESULTS

In lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses, offspring of parents with BP-I had significantly increased risk of developing MDD and BP-I than those with BP-II. Regarding clinical characteristics, ADHD rating scale and childhood trauma scale were significantly higher in offspring of parents with BP-I than that in those with BP-II.

CONCLUSION

The present study supports that BP-I may be etiologically distinct from BP-II by a possible genetic liability. Our findings indicate that additional research related to bipolar offspring is needed to enhance understanding of differences between BP-I and BP-II.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估患有I型双相情感障碍(BP-I)的父母的后代与患有II型双相情感障碍(BP-II)的父母的后代在精神病理学方面的差异。

方法

样本包括201名6至17岁的后代,他们至少有一位父母患有BP-I或BP-II。使用韩国版《儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症评定量表-目前和终生版》对后代进行诊断评估。评估了精神病理学和临床特征,包括终生DSM-5诊断、抑郁和童年创伤。还比较了6至11岁学龄儿童和12至17岁青少年的终生DSM-5诊断。

结果

在终生DSM-5诊断中,患有BP-I的父母的后代患重度抑郁症(MDD)和BP-I的风险比患有BP-II的父母的后代显著增加。关于临床特征,患有BP-I的父母的后代的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)评定量表和童年创伤量表显著高于患有BP-II的父母的后代。

结论

本研究支持BP-I在病因上可能与BP-II不同,存在可能的遗传易感性。我们的研究结果表明,需要进行更多与双相情感障碍后代相关的研究,以加深对BP-I和BP-II之间差异的理解。

相似文献

4

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验