Scott Jan, Vorspan Florence, Loftus Josephine, Bellivier Frank, Etain Bruno
Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2021 Oct 1;9(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40345-021-00234-4.
Major contributors to the global burden of bipolar disorders (BD) are the early age at onset (AAO) and the co-occurrence of non-mood disorders before and after the onset of BD. Using data from two independent cohorts from Europe and the USA, we investigated whether the trajectories of BD-I onset and patterns of psychiatric comorbidities differed in (a) individuals with or without a family history (FH) of BD, or (b) probands and parents who both had BD-I.
First, we estimated cumulative probabilities and AAO of comorbid mental disorders in familial and non-familial cases of BD-I (Europe, n = 573), and sex-matched proband-parent pairs of BD-I cases (USA, n = 194). Then we used time to onset analyses to compare overall AAO of BD-I and AAO according to onset polarity. Next, we examined associations between AAO and polarity of onset of BD-I according to individual experiences of comorbidities. This included analysis of the density of antecedent events (defined as the number of antecedent comorbidities per year of exposure to mental illness per individual) and time trend analysis of trajectory paths plotted for the subgroups included in each cohort (using R goodness of fit analysis).
Earlier AAO of BD-I was found in FH versus non-FH cases (log rank test = 7.63; p = 0.006) and in probands versus parents with BD-I (log rank test = 15.31; p = 0.001). In the European cohort, AAO of BD-I was significantly associated with factors such as: FH of BD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60), earlier AAO of first non-mood disorder (HR: 0.93) and greater number of comorbidities (HR: 0.74). In the USA cohort, probands with BD-I had an earlier AAO for depressive and manic episodes and AAO was also associated with e.g., number of comorbidities (HR: 0.65) and year of birth (HR: 2.44). Trajectory path analysis indicated significant differences in density of antecedents between subgroups within each cohort. However, the time trend R analysis was significantly different for the European cohort only.
Estimating density of antecedent events and comparing trajectory plots for different BD subgroups are informative adjuncts to established statistical approaches and may offer additional insights that enhance understanding of the evolution of BD-I.
双相情感障碍(BD)全球负担的主要促成因素是发病年龄早(AAO)以及BD发病前后非心境障碍的共病情况。利用来自欧洲和美国两个独立队列的数据,我们调查了双相I型障碍(BD-I)发病轨迹和精神疾病共病模式在以下方面是否存在差异:(a)有或无BD家族史(FH)的个体,或(b)均患有BD-I的先证者和父母。
首先,我们估计了BD-I家族性和非家族性病例(欧洲,n = 573)以及BD-I病例的性别匹配先证者-父母对(美国,n = 194)中共病精神障碍的累积概率和AAO。然后我们使用发病时间分析来比较BD-I的总体AAO以及根据发病极性的AAO。接下来,我们根据共病的个体经历检查了BD-I的AAO与发病极性之间的关联。这包括对先行事件密度的分析(定义为每个个体每年暴露于精神疾病的先行共病数量)以及对每个队列中纳入的亚组绘制的轨迹路径的时间趋势分析(使用R拟合优度分析)。
在有FH与无FH的病例中(对数秩检验 = 7.63;p = 0.006)以及在BD-I的先证者与父母中(对数秩检验 = 15.31;p = 0.001)发现BD-I的AAO更早。在欧洲队列中,BD-I的AAO与以下因素显著相关:BD的FH(风险比[HR]:0.60)、首次非心境障碍更早的AAO(HR:0.93)以及更多的共病数量(HR:0.74)。在美国队列中,患有BD-I的先证者抑郁和躁狂发作的AAO更早,并且AAO还与例如共病数量(HR:0.65)和出生年份(HR:2.44)相关。轨迹路径分析表明每个队列中亚组之间先行事件密度存在显著差异。然而,仅欧洲队列的时间趋势R分析存在显著差异。
估计先行事件密度并比较不同BD亚组的轨迹图是既定统计方法的有益辅助手段,可能提供额外的见解,增强对BD-I演变的理解。