American College of Healthcare Architects, Fellow, Harvard Medical School Center for Bioethics, 4 Longfellow Place 1604, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Feb;34(2):312-316. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4707-0.
The volume and rigor of evidence-based design have increasingly grown over the last three decades since the field's inception, supporting research-based designs to improve patient outcomes. This movement of using evidence from engineering and the hard sciences is not necessarily new, but design-based health research launched with the demonstration that post-operative patients with window views towards nature versus a brick wall yielded shorter lengths of hospital stay and less analgesia use, promoting subsequent investigations and guideline development. Architects continue to base healthcare design decisions on credible research, with a recent shift in physician involvement in the design process by introducing clinicians to design-thinking methodologies. In parallel, architects are becoming familiar with research-based practice, allowing for further rigor and clinical partnership. This cross-pollination of fields could benefit from further discussion surrounding the ethics of hospital architecture as applied to current building codes and guidelines. Historical precedents where the building was used as a form of treatment can inform future concepts of ethical design practice when applied to current population health challenges, such as design for dementia care. While architecture itself does not necessarily provide a cure, good design can act as a preventative tool and enhance overall quality of care.
自该领域创立以来的过去三十年中,循证设计的数量和严格程度不断增加,支持基于研究的设计以改善患者的预后。将工程和硬科学的证据用于设计的这一趋势并不新鲜,但设计导向的健康研究始于术后有自然景观窗户的患者比面对砖墙的患者住院时间更短、镇痛药使用更少的研究结果,这促进了后续的研究和指南制定。建筑师继续基于可信的研究来做出医疗保健设计决策,最近通过向临床医生介绍设计思维方法来引入医生参与设计过程。与此同时,建筑师也越来越熟悉基于研究的实践,从而可以提高严谨性和临床合作。这种领域的交叉授粉可以通过进一步讨论应用于当前建筑规范和指南的医院建筑伦理来受益。在将其应用于当前人口健康挑战(例如痴呆症护理设计)时,历史上建筑被用作治疗形式的先例可以为当前的伦理设计实践提供未来的概念。虽然建筑本身不一定能提供治愈方法,但良好的设计可以作为预防工具,提高整体护理质量。