Suppr超能文献

开发和验证用于急诊部门的患者护理体验调查。

Development and validation of a patient experience of care survey for emergency departments.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):102-112. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13853. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To (1) develop a survey to assess the patient experience of care in hospital-based emergency departments (ED) and (2) evaluate the reliability and validity of composite measures of patient experience using data collected through the experimental implementation of the newly developed Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care (EDPEC) Discharged to Community (DTC) Survey.

DATA SOURCE

4893 adult patients were treated in the ED of 16 hospitals across the United States in 2018.

STUDY DESIGN

The study utilized a cross-sectional survey.

DATA COLLECTION

Survey development activities included a literature review, focus groups, and cognitive interviews with recently discharged ED patients, technical expert panels, and multiple field experiments. Survey development resulted in a 34-item instrument; the analysis reported here focuses on 18 items on patient experience of care. Using data from the EDPEC DTC Survey in the 2018 Feasibility Test, we performed confirmatory factor analysis to group 15 evaluative survey items into composite measures. We examined internal consistency reliability, interunit reliability, and associations between each composite measure and patients' overall rating and willingness to recommend the ED.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Analyses of 15 evaluative items identified four composite measures: Getting Timely Care, How Well Doctors and Nurses Communicate, Communication about Medications, and Communication about Follow-up. Patient-level internal consistency reliability exceeded 0.75 for two of four composites; ED-level internal consistency reliability exceeded 0.83 for all four composites. Interunit reliability estimates indicated that 450 survey completes per ED results in at least 0.70 reliability for all composites. Higher scores on each composite were associated with higher overall ratings and willingness to recommend the ED.

CONCLUSIONS

The composite measures derived from the EDPEC DTC Survey are statistically reliable and valid. These results provide guidance for EDPEC DTC Survey adopters on how to construct meaningful and psychometrically-sound composite measures for monitoring the quality of care they provide.

摘要

目的

(1)开发一项调查工具,以评估医院急诊科(ED)的患者护理体验,(2)利用通过新开发的 ED 患者护理体验出院至社区(EDPEC-DTC)调查的实验实施收集的数据,评估患者护理体验的综合指标的可靠性和有效性。

数据来源

2018 年,美国 16 家医院的 4893 名成年患者在 ED 接受治疗。

研究设计

该研究采用了横断面调查。

数据收集

调查开发活动包括文献回顾、焦点小组、最近出院的 ED 患者的认知访谈、技术专家小组以及多次现场实验。调查开发产生了一个 34 项的工具;本分析报告重点介绍了护理体验的 18 个项目。利用 2018 年可行性测试中 EDPEC-DTC 调查的数据,我们进行了验证性因子分析,将 15 项评价性调查项目分为综合指标。我们检查了内部一致性信度、单位间信度以及每个综合指标与患者整体评分和对 ED 的推荐意愿之间的关系。

主要发现

对 15 项评价性项目的分析确定了四个综合指标:及时获得护理、医生和护士的沟通情况、药物沟通和随访沟通。四个综合指标中有两个的患者层面内部一致性信度超过 0.75;所有四个综合指标的 ED 层面内部一致性信度均超过 0.83。单位间可靠性估计表明,每个 ED 完成 450 份调查可确保所有综合指标的可靠性至少达到 0.70。每个综合指标的得分越高,与整体评分越高和对 ED 的推荐意愿越强相关。

结论

从 EDPEC-DTC 调查中得出的综合指标在统计学上是可靠和有效的。这些结果为 EDPEC-DTC 调查的采用者提供了指导,说明如何构建有意义且具有心理测量学意义的综合指标,以监测他们提供的护理质量。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a patient experience of care survey for emergency departments.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):102-112. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13853. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Medicare Advantage and prescription drug plan disenrollment reasons survey.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):930-939. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13160. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
4
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Emergency Department Utilization and Experience.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):49-56. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06738-0. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
6
Methods used to streamline the CAHPS Hospital Survey.
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2057-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00478.x.
9
Development of Valid and Reliable Measures of Patient and Family Experiences of Hospice Care for Public Reporting.
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jul;21(7):924-932. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0594. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
10
Reliable and Valid Survey-Based Measures to Assess Quality of Care in Home-Based Serious Illness Programs.
J Palliat Med. 2022 Jun;25(6):864-872. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0424. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Use of CAHPS patient experience survey data as part of a patient-centered medical home quality improvement initiative.
J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Jul 7;7:41-54. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S69963. eCollection 2015.
6
Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework.
Psychol Methods. 2014 Mar;19(1):72-91. doi: 10.1037/a0032138. Epub 2013 May 6.
7
An intervention connecting low-acuity emergency department patients with primary care: effect on future primary care linkage.
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;61(3):312-321.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.021. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
9
The financial impact of health information exchange on emergency department care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):328-33. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000394. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验