Suppr超能文献

俯卧撑两种不同计分和执行方法的建构效度。

Construct Validity of Two Different Methods of Scoring and Performing Push-ups.

机构信息

School of Kinesiology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Nov;33(11):2971-2980. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002843.

Abstract

Clemons, J. Construct validity of two different methods of scoring and performing push-ups. J Strength Cond Res 33(11): 2971-2980, 2019-The purpose of this investigation was to determine the construct validity of the standard push-ups (STPUs) and hand-release push-ups (HRPUs) by comparing them to the criterion measures of absolute strength (i.e., 1 repetition maximum [RM] bench press [BP]) and relative strength (1RM·body mass). Thirty-one, college-age males were recruited for the study. The HRPU was performed by lifting the palms from the floor between each push-up (PU), whereas the STPU only required chest contact at the bottom before returning to the support position. Push-up rate was controlled by metronome. A counter-balanced, cross-over design was used with 1 week between each test. Correlations were conducted on push-up scores and criterion measures. In addition, STPU and HRPU scores were compared to determine whether there was a difference in the maximum number of push-ups executed. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether 1RM BP (i.e., absolute strength) might be predicted from push-up performance: 1RM Bench Press kg = 48.675 + (0.8832·body mass) + (1.318·# of standard push-ups executed) + (-157.82·PU distance m). Results indicated significantly more HRPUs than STPUs were executed. Push-up raw scores were found to be unrelated to absolute strength. Standard push-up raw scores were found to be significantly correlated with relative strength (r = 0.71, prob. = 0.0001). Multiple regression analysis also indicated that absolute strength may be reasonably estimated if the predictor variables of body mass and vertical push-up distance are considered along with push-up score (R = 0.791, R = 0.62.5%).

摘要

克莱蒙斯,J. 两种不同俯卧撑计分和执行方法的结构效度。J 力量与调节研究 33(11):2971-2980,2019-本研究旨在通过比较标准俯卧撑(STPU)和手离俯卧撑(HRPU)与绝对力量的标准(即 1 次重复最大[RM]卧推[BP])和相对力量(1RM·体重)来确定它们的结构效度。研究招募了 31 名大学年龄的男性。HRPU 是通过在每一次俯卧撑之间抬起手掌离开地面来完成的(PU),而 STPU 只需要在回到支撑位置之前在底部与胸部接触。俯卧撑速度由节拍器控制。使用平衡交叉设计,每次测试之间间隔 1 周。对俯卧撑得分和标准测量进行了相关性分析。此外,比较了 STPU 和 HRPU 的得分,以确定执行的最大俯卧撑数量是否存在差异。多元回归分析用于确定 1RM BP(即绝对力量)是否可以通过俯卧撑表现来预测:1RM 卧推公斤= 48.675 +(0.8832·体重)+(1.318·执行的标准俯卧撑数)+(-157.82·PU 距离 m)。结果表明,执行的 HRPU 明显多于 STPU。俯卧撑原始分数与绝对力量无关。标准俯卧撑原始分数与相对力量显著相关(r = 0.71,prob. = 0.0001)。多元回归分析还表明,如果考虑体重和垂直俯卧撑距离的预测变量以及俯卧撑得分,绝对力量可以合理估计(R = 0.791,R = 0.62.5%)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验