• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

查尔森合并症指数与支架再狭窄及冠状动脉疾病程度的关系。

The relationship of Charlson comorbidity index with stent restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Karabağ Turgut, Altuntaş Emіne, Kalaycı Belma, Şahіn Bahar, Somuncu Mustafa Umut, Çakır Mustafa Ozan

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.

Department of Cardiology, Ataturk State Hospital, Zonguldak, Turkey.

出版信息

Interv Med Appl Sci. 2018 Jun;10(2):70-75. doi: 10.1556/1646.10.2018.20.

DOI:10.1556/1646.10.2018.20
PMID:30363352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6167624/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of comorbid conditions [Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)] on stent restenosis who underwent coronary angioplasty earlier.

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups; patients with critical restenosis [recurrent diameter stenosis >50% at the stent segment or its edges (5-mm segments adjacent to the stent) (Group 1;  = 53, mean age: 63.8 ± 9.9 years)] and patients with no critical restenosis [<50% obstruction (Group 2;  = 94, mean age: 62.1 ± 9.1 years)]. The CCI and modified CCI were used for the presence of comorbid conditions. The Gensini scoring system was used to assess the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD).

RESULTS

Group 1 had a significantly greater CCI and modified CCI score compared to Group 2 (7.1 ± 3.7 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6,  = 0.006; 6.9 ± 3.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.5,  = 0.008, respectively). There was a weak correlation, albeit significant, between the modified CCI score and restenosis percentage ( = 0.29,  < 0.001;  = 0.25,  = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the CCI score is greater among patients with stent restenosis than those without. CCI score is higher among patients with a more diffuse CAD than with a milder disease extent.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是调查合并症[查尔森合并症指数(CCI)]对早期接受冠状动脉成形术患者支架再狭窄的影响。

方法

患者分为两组;严重再狭窄患者[支架节段或其边缘(与支架相邻的5毫米节段)复发性直径狭窄>50%(第1组;n = 53,平均年龄:63.8±9.9岁)]和无严重再狭窄患者[阻塞<50%(第2组;n = 94,平均年龄:62.1±9.1岁)]。使用CCI和改良CCI来评估合并症的存在情况。采用Gensini评分系统评估冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的程度。

结果

与第2组相比,第1组的CCI和改良CCI评分显著更高(分别为7.1±3.7对5.6±1.6,P = 0.006;6.9±3.6对4.5±1.5,P = 0.008)。改良CCI评分与再狭窄百分比之间存在弱相关性,尽管具有显著性(分别为r = 0.29,P < 0.001;r = 0.25,P = 0.003)。

结论

总之,支架再狭窄患者的CCI评分高于无再狭窄患者。CAD更弥漫的患者的CCI评分高于疾病程度较轻的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44a/6167624/ecd7809ee113/imas-10-02-20_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44a/6167624/ecd7809ee113/imas-10-02-20_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44a/6167624/ecd7809ee113/imas-10-02-20_f001.jpg

相似文献

1
The relationship of Charlson comorbidity index with stent restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease.查尔森合并症指数与支架再狭窄及冠状动脉疾病程度的关系。
Interv Med Appl Sci. 2018 Jun;10(2):70-75. doi: 10.1556/1646.10.2018.20.
2
Relationship between the extent of coronary artery disease and in-stent restenosis in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2017 Dec;45(8):702-708. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2017.72921.
3
Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: immediate results and 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Oct;32(4):980-4. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00333-7.
4
A single center investigation of bare-metal or drug-eluting stent restenosis from 1633 consecutive Chinese Han ethnic patients.对1633例连续的中国汉族患者进行的裸金属支架或药物洗脱支架再狭窄的单中心研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Apr 5;119(7):533-8.
5
Predictors of recurrent restenosis after coronary stenting: an analysis of 197 patients.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2002 Apr;14(4):187-91.
6
Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial.西罗莫司洗脱支架或紫杉醇洗脱支架与球囊血管成形术预防冠状动脉支架内再狭窄患者复发的随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):165-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.2.165.
7
The relationship between angiotensin converting enzyme gene polymorphism, coronary artery disease, and stent restenosis: the role of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus.血管紧张素转换酶基因多态性、冠状动脉疾病与支架再狭窄之间的关系:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在糖尿病患者支架再狭窄中的作用。
Int Heart J. 2005 Sep;46(5):889-97. doi: 10.1536/ihj.46.889.
8
Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group.冠状动脉支架置入术与球囊血管成形术治疗初次球囊血管成形术后再狭窄的比较。再狭窄支架研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1672-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392304.
9
Serum concentration of insulin-like growth factor-I, but not tumor necrosis factor-alpha, measured twelve months after stenting of the infarct-related artery, is associated with in-stent restenosis.梗死后相关动脉支架置入 12 个月后,胰岛素样生长因子-1 的血清浓度与支架内再狭窄有关,但肿瘤坏死因子-α则没有关系。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2010 Apr-Jun;24(2):149-56.
10
Mechanisms of acute lumen gain and recurrent restenosis after rotational atherectomy of diffuse in-stent restenosis: a quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound study.弥漫性支架内再狭窄旋磨术后急性管腔获得及再发再狭窄的机制:一项定量血管造影及血管内超声研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Jul;34(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00151-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning-based models for prediction of the risk of stroke in coronary artery disease patients receiving coronary revascularization.基于机器学习的模型预测接受冠状动脉血运重建的冠心病患者中风风险。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0296402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296402. eCollection 2024.
2
Opportunistic assessment of ischemic heart disease risk using abdominopelvic computed tomography and medical record data: a multimodal explainable artificial intelligence approach.利用腹盆腔计算机断层扫描和病历数据进行机会性缺血性心脏病风险评估:一种多模态可解释人工智能方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 29;13(1):21034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47895-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Recurrent in-stent restenosis, certainty of its origin, uncertainty about treatment.支架内再狭窄复发,其起源明确,治疗存在不确定性。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.073. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
2
Analyzing Gensini Score as a Semi-Continuous Outcome.将Gensini评分作为半连续结果进行分析。
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2016 Apr 13;11(2):55-61.
3
Understanding and managing in-stent restenosis: a review of clinical data, from pathogenesis to treatment.理解与管理支架内再狭窄:从发病机制到治疗的临床数据综述
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Oct;8(10):E1150-E1162. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.93.
4
Prevalence and Impact of Co-morbidity Burden as Defined by the Charlson Co-morbidity Index on 30-Day and 1- and 5-Year Outcomes After Coronary Stent Implantation (from the Nobori-2 Study).根据查尔森合并症指数定义的合并症负担在冠状动脉支架植入术后30天、1年和5年结局中的患病率及影响(来自Nobori-2研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Aug 1;116(3):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.04.047. Epub 2015 May 8.
5
Prognosis of elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 2001 to 2011: A report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) registry.2001 年至 2011 年行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的预后:来自瑞典冠状动脉造影及血管成形术登记处(SCAAR)登记的报告。
Am Heart J. 2014 May;167(5):666-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
6
National trends in utilization and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures among people with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain (2001-2011).西班牙2型糖尿病患者和非2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉血运重建手术的使用情况及治疗结果的全国趋势(2001 - 2011年)
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Jan 3;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-3.
7
Validity of Charlson Comorbidity Index in patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome. Insights from the nationwide AMIS Plus registry 2002-2012.Charlson 合并症指数在急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者中的有效性。来自全国性 AMIS Plus 登记研究 2002-2012 年的见解。
Heart. 2014 Feb;100(4):288-94. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304588. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
8
Enhanced mortality risk prediction with a focus on high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 1,208,137 procedures in the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry).高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:从 NCDR(国家心血管数据注册中心)1208137 例手术中得出的注重高危患者的死亡率风险预测结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):790-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.020.
9
Influence of comorbid conditions on one-year outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.合并症对非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者一年结局的影响。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Apr;86(4):291-6. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0702. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
10
Coronary stents: current status.冠状动脉支架:现状。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 31;56(10 Suppl):S1-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.007.