• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Gleason 4级前列腺癌各亚型的临床意义

Clinical significance of subtypes of Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer.

作者信息

Hassan Oudai, Matoso Andres

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

Departments of Pathology and Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Sep;7(Suppl 4):S477-S483. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.02.06.

DOI:10.21037/tau.2018.02.06
PMID:30363452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6178320/
Abstract

Major updates in prostate cancer grading have been adopted in recent times. These include redefinitions of Gleason pattern (GP) 4 architectural variants and reporting of the grade group (GG) system, which divides prostate cancer into five groups that better stratify patients. Still, the GG system uses the GPs 3, 4 or 5 to define each GG. Patients belonging to GG 2, 3 and 4 have increasing amounts of GP 4 in the composition of their tumors. GP4 is a heterogeneous group of morphologic variants that include poorly formed glands, glomeruloid structures, cribriform glands, and fused glands. Recently published studies suggest that the morphologic subtypes of GP 4 have different clinical significance. While the diagnostic reproducibility of poorly formed glands and fused glands is low, glomeruloid structures and cribriform glands are easier to be distinguished from other morphologies. A growing body of evidence suggests that the presence of cribriform glands is associated with an aggressive clinical course compared with other architectural subtypes. The latest 2014 guidelines issued by the International Society of Urologic Pathology recommend that the percentage of GP 4 be reported on needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. The data reviewed here invites consideration for the need to report the subtype of GP 4, especially the presence or absence of cribriform glands.

摘要

近年来,前列腺癌分级有了重大更新。这些更新包括对 Gleason 模式(GP)4 结构变异的重新定义以及分级组(GG)系统的报告,该系统将前列腺癌分为五组,能更好地对患者进行分层。尽管如此,GG 系统仍使用 GP 3、4 或 5 来定义每个 GG。属于 GG 2、3 和 4 的患者肿瘤成分中 GP 4 的含量逐渐增加。GP4 是一组形态学变异的异质性群体,包括形态不佳的腺体、肾小球样结构、筛状腺体和融合腺体。最近发表的研究表明,GP 4 的形态学亚型具有不同的临床意义。虽然形态不佳的腺体和融合腺体的诊断可重复性较低,但肾小球样结构和筛状腺体更容易与其他形态区分开来。越来越多的证据表明,与其他结构亚型相比,筛状腺体的存在与侵袭性临床病程相关。国际泌尿病理学会发布的最新 2014 年指南建议,在穿刺活检和根治性前列腺切除术(RP)标本中报告 GP 4 的百分比。此处回顾的数据促使人们考虑报告 GP 4 亚型的必要性,尤其是筛状腺体的有无。

相似文献

1
Clinical significance of subtypes of Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer.Gleason 4级前列腺癌各亚型的临床意义
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Sep;7(Suppl 4):S477-S483. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.02.06.
2
Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.当代前列腺癌 Gleason 模式 4 的百分比和结构类型对根治性前列腺切除术预后的意义。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Oct;40(10):1400-6. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000691.
3
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议:分级模式的定义及新分级系统的建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
4
SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.SOCS3免疫组化表达似乎支持2005年和2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)改良的Gleason分级系统。
Prostate. 2017 May;77(6):597-603. doi: 10.1002/pros.23299. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
5
Prognostic significance of architectural subtypes of Gleason grade 4 prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy: A semiquantitative method of evaluation.根治性前列腺切除术中 Gleason 4 级前列腺癌结构亚型的预后意义:一种半定量评估方法。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2021 Feb;50:151678. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151678. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
6
Prostate cancer with cribriform morphology: diagnosis, aggressiveness, molecular pathology and possible relationships with intraductal carcinoma.具有筛状形态的前列腺癌:诊断、侵袭性、分子病理学及与导管内癌的可能关系。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Jul;18(7):685-693. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1469406. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
7
Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.当代前列腺癌的Gleason分级:结合对实施2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议实际问题的讨论进行更新
Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Apr;41(4):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820.
8
Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下活检检测到的Gleason 4级形态在预测Gleason评分3 + 4 = 7的前列腺癌升级或分期升高方面的效用
Virchows Arch. 2016 Sep;469(3):313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-016-1981-2. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
9
Distinct Adverse Clinical Outcomes of Small and Large Cribriform Patterns on Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer: A Preliminary Study.Gleason 评分 7 分的前列腺癌中小筛状模式和大筛状模式不同的不良临床结局:一项初步研究
Urol Res Pract. 2023 Sep;49(5):324-328. doi: 10.5152/tud.2023.23076.
10
Prostate cancer grading in 2018: limitations, implementations, cribriform morphology, and biological markers.2018年前列腺癌分级:局限性、实施情况、筛状形态及生物标志物
Int J Biol Markers. 2018 Nov;33(4):331-334. doi: 10.1177/1724600818781296. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Histopathological evaluation and grading for prostate cancer: current issues and crucial aspects.前列腺癌的组织病理学评估和分级:当前的问题和关键方面。
Asian J Androl. 2024 Nov 1;26(6):575-581. doi: 10.4103/aja202440. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
2
Reinterpretation of prostate cancer pathology by Appl1, Sortilin and Syndecan-1 biomarkers.通过Appl1、Sortilin和Syndecan-1生物标志物对前列腺癌病理学进行重新诠释。
Sci Data. 2024 Aug 8;11(1):852. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03696-0.
3
External Validation of a Digital Pathology-based Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Architecture in the NRG/RTOG 9902 Phase 3 Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Histologic Grading of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Can Be Further Optimized: Analysis of the Relative Prognostic Strength of Individual Architectural Patterns in 1275 Patients From the Canary Retrospective Cohort.前列腺腺癌的组织学分级可进一步优化:对来自金丝雀回顾性队列的1275例患者中个体结构模式的相对预后强度分析
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Nov;40(11):1439-1456. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000736.
2
Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.当代前列腺癌 Gleason 模式 4 的百分比和结构类型对根治性前列腺切除术预后的意义。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Oct;40(10):1400-6. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000691.
3
基于数字病理学的多模态人工智能架构在 NRG/RTOG 9902 三期临床试验中的外部验证。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Oct;7(5):1024-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.004. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
4
Incidence and Predicting Factors of Histopathological Features at Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the mpMRI Era: Results of a Single Tertiary Referral Center.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术在 mpMRI 时代的组织病理学特征的发生率及预测因素:单一三级转诊中心的结果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 21;59(3):625. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030625.
5
Diffusion Restriction Comparison between Gleason 4 Fused Glands and Cribriform Glands within Patient Using Whole-Mount Prostate Pathology as Ground Truth.以全层前列腺病理为金标准,比较患者体内 Gleason 4 融合性腺泡与筛状腺泡之间的扩散受限情况。
Tomography. 2022 Mar 2;8(2):635-643. doi: 10.3390/tomography8020053.
6
Clinicopathological Analysis of the ISUP Grade Group And Other Parameters in Prostate Cancer: Elucidation of Mutual Impact of the Various Parameters.前列腺癌中ISUP分级组及其他参数的临床病理分析:阐明各参数间的相互影响
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 28;11:695251. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.695251. eCollection 2021.
7
Multi-resolution open-top light-sheet microscopy to enable efficient 3D pathology workflows.多分辨率开放式光片显微镜实现高效3D病理工作流程。
Biomed Opt Express. 2020 Oct 22;11(11):6605-6619. doi: 10.1364/BOE.408684. eCollection 2020 Nov 1.
8
Beyond the Gleason score: the prognostic significance of prostate cancer subtypes.超越Gleason评分:前列腺癌亚型的预后意义。
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 May;7(Suppl 2):S260-S261. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.04.01.
Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.
Gleason 4级前列腺腺癌模式:泌尿生殖病理学家之间的观察者间一致性研究
Histopathology. 2016 Sep;69(3):441-9. doi: 10.1111/his.12976. Epub 2016 May 24.
4
Disease-specific survival of patients with invasive cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer at diagnostic biopsy.诊断性活检时浸润性筛状和导管内前列腺癌患者的疾病特异性生存率。
Mod Pathol. 2016 Jun;29(6):630-6. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.49. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
5
Grading of Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future.前列腺癌的分级:过去、现在与未来
Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Mar;17(3):25. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0576-4.
6
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议:分级模式的定义及新分级系统的建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
7
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.一种当代前列腺癌分级系统:格里森评分的有效替代方案。
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
8
Diagnosis of "Poorly Formed Glands" Gleason Pattern 4 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: An Interobserver Reproducibility Study Among Urologic Pathologists With Recommendations.针吸活检中“腺体形态不佳”的Gleason 4级前列腺腺癌的诊断:泌尿外科病理学家间的观察者间再现性研究及建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Oct;39(10):1331-9. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000457.
9
Not all gleason pattern 4 prostate cancers are created equal: A study of latent prostatic carcinomas in a cystoprostatectomy and autopsy series.并非所有 Gleason 4 级前列腺癌都是一样的:一项对膀胱前列腺切除术和尸检系列中潜伏性前列腺癌的研究。
Prostate. 2015 Sep;75(12):1277-84. doi: 10.1002/pros.23009. Epub 2015 May 11.
10
A concise update on prostate pathology.前列腺病理学简明更新
Cesk Patol. 2014;50(4):120-8.