Stang Antonia S, Trudeau Melanie, Vanderkooi Otto G, Lee Bonita E, Chui Linda, Pang Xiao-Li, Allen Vanessa, Burnham Carey-Ann D, Goldfarb David M, MacDonald Judy, Parsons Brendon, Petrich Astrid, Pollari Frank, Tarr Phillip I, Tipples Graham, Zhuo Ran, Freedman Stephen B
Departments of Pediatrics, Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2018 Sep 27;2018:2589826. doi: 10.1155/2018/2589826. eCollection 2018.
We sought to develop diagnostic test guidance definitions for pediatric enteric infections to facilitate the interpretation of positive test results in the era of multianalyte molecular diagnostic test platforms.
We employed a systematic, two-phase, modified Delphi consensus process consisting of three web-based surveys and an expert panel face-to-face meeting. In phase 1, we surveyed an advisory panel of North American experts to select pathogens requiring diagnostic test guidance definition development. In phase 2, we convened a 14-member expert panel to develop, refine, and select the final definitions through two web-based questionnaires interspersed with a face-to-face meeting. Both questionnaires asked panelists to rate the degree to which they agreed that if the definition is met the pathogen is likely to be causative of clinical illness.
The advisory panel survey identified 19 pathogens requiring definitions. In the expert panel premeeting survey, 13 of the 19 definitions evaluated were rated as being highly likely ("agree" or "strongly agree") to be responsible for acute gastroenteritis symptoms by ≥67% of respondent panel members. The definitions for the remaining six pathogens ( nonenteric adenovirus, astrovirus, and ) were indeterminate. After the expert panel meeting, only two of the modified definitions, and , failed to achieve the specified threshold of ≥67% agreement.
We developed diagnostic test guidance definitions to assist healthcare providers for 17 enteric pathogens. We identified two pathogens that require further research and definition development.
我们试图为儿科肠道感染制定诊断测试指导定义,以促进在多分析物分子诊断测试平台时代对阳性测试结果的解读。
我们采用了一个系统的、两阶段的、改良的德尔菲共识流程,包括三次基于网络的调查和一次专家小组面对面会议。在第一阶段,我们对北美专家咨询小组进行了调查,以选择需要制定诊断测试指导定义的病原体。在第二阶段,我们召集了一个由14名成员组成的专家小组,通过两次基于网络的问卷调查并穿插一次面对面会议来制定、完善和选择最终定义。两份问卷都要求小组成员对他们同意如果满足该定义病原体很可能是临床疾病病因的程度进行评分。
咨询小组调查确定了19种需要定义的病原体。在专家小组会前调查中,19个评估定义中的13个被≥67%的应答小组成员评为极有可能(“同意”或“强烈同意”)导致急性胃肠炎症状。其余六种病原体(非肠道腺病毒、星状病毒等)的定义不明确。专家小组会议后,只有两个修改后的定义未达到≥67%同意率的指定阈值。
我们制定了诊断测试指导定义,以帮助医疗服务提供者识别17种肠道病原体。我们确定了两种需要进一步研究和定义制定的病原体。