• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立并规范可避免复苏审查(SAFECARR)电子德尔菲专家标准:制定用于对儿科重症监护病房(PICU)内心脏骤停进行分类和审查的共识框架。

eStablish And Formalize Expert Criteria for Avoidable Resuscitation Review (SAFECARR) Electronic Delphi: Development of a Consensus Framework for Classifying and Reviewing Cardiac Arrests Within the PICU.

作者信息

Dewan Maya, O'Halloran Amanda, Kleinman Monica, Tegtmeyer Ken, Gallagher Regan, Nadkarni Vinay, Sutton Robert M, Wolfe Heather A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;21(11):992-999. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002488.

DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000002488
PMID:32701751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8809370/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of classifying and reviewing pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the PICU.

DESIGN

A three-round electronic Delphi consensus study with an additional in-person session with pediatric resuscitation experts. The modified electronic Delphi consisted of survey questions sent to the expert panel with the goals of (1) achieving consensus on definitions of avoidable, potentially avoidable, and unavoidable PICU in-hospital cardiac arrest and (2) achieving consensus and ranking of a list of factors that contribute to potentially avoidable PICU in-hospital cardiac arrest.

SETTING

Electronic surveys of resuscitation experts including pediatric critical care, cardiac critical care, emergency medicine, and hospital medicine physicians, nurses, advance practice nurses, and resuscitation researchers.

PATIENTS

Not applicable.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Over three rounds of an electronic Delphi, 24 resuscitation experts participated. In Round 1, consensus was reached for the definitions of potentially avoidable and unavoidable cardiac arrest. Consensus was not reached for avoidable cardiac arrest. In Round 2, the expert panel agreed with seven factors from the literature and achieved consensus on an additional seven factors. Consensus was achieved on the modified definition of avoidable cardiac arrest. In Round 3, participants were asked to rank the contributing factors in order of their importance. For the in-person session, the consensus definitions and contributing factors from the modified electronic Delphi were presented to a multidisciplinary group of pediatric resuscitation experts and reached consensus for all three definitions.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary group of pediatric resuscitation experts generated a consensus-based framework to classify and review pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the PICU. Future work will focus on the application of this framework and further validation of these definitions and contributing factors for in-hospital cardiac arrest both within and outside the PICU.

摘要

目的

制定一个共识框架,以指导儿科重症监护病房(PICU)内儿童住院心脏骤停的分类和审查过程。

设计

三轮电子德尔菲共识研究,并与儿科复苏专家进行一次面对面会议。改良的电子德尔菲法包括向专家小组发送调查问卷,目标是:(1)就可避免、潜在可避免和不可避免的PICU住院心脏骤停的定义达成共识;(2)就导致潜在可避免的PICU住院心脏骤停的一系列因素达成共识并进行排序。

地点

对包括儿科重症监护、心脏重症监护、急诊医学和医院医学的医生、护士、高级实践护士以及复苏研究人员在内的复苏专家进行电子调查。

患者

不适用。

干预措施

不适用。

测量和主要结果

在三轮电子德尔菲法中,24名复苏专家参与。在第一轮中,就潜在可避免和不可避免的心脏骤停的定义达成了共识。对于可避免的心脏骤停未达成共识。在第二轮中,专家小组认可了文献中的七个因素,并就另外七个因素达成了共识。就可避免的心脏骤停的修改定义达成了共识。在第三轮中,要求参与者按重要性对促成因素进行排序。在面对面会议上,向多学科的儿科复苏专家小组介绍了改良电子德尔菲法的共识定义和促成因素,并就所有三个定义达成了共识。

结论

一个多学科的儿科复苏专家小组生成了一个基于共识的框架,用于对PICU内儿童住院心脏骤停进行分类和审查。未来的工作将集中在该框架的应用以及对这些定义和促成因素在PICU内外的住院心脏骤停中的进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a89e/8809370/a7aeea7ae246/nihms-1761066-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a89e/8809370/22a755b36222/nihms-1761066-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a89e/8809370/2e68fac19240/nihms-1761066-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a89e/8809370/a7aeea7ae246/nihms-1761066-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a89e/8809370/22a755b36222/nihms-1761066-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a89e/8809370/2e68fac19240/nihms-1761066-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a89e/8809370/a7aeea7ae246/nihms-1761066-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
eStablish And Formalize Expert Criteria for Avoidable Resuscitation Review (SAFECARR) Electronic Delphi: Development of a Consensus Framework for Classifying and Reviewing Cardiac Arrests Within the PICU.建立并规范可避免复苏审查(SAFECARR)电子德尔菲专家标准:制定用于对儿科重症监护病房(PICU)内心脏骤停进行分类和审查的共识框架。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;21(11):992-999. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002488.
2
Delphi Analysis of Science Gaps in the 2015 American Heart Association Cardiac Arrest Guidelines.德尔菲分析 2015 年美国心脏协会心脏骤停指南中的科学空白
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 30;7(13):e008571. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008571.
3
A modified Delphi approach to determine current treatment advances for the development of a resuscitation program for maternal cardiac arrest.改良 Delphi 法在制定心脏骤停产妇复苏计划中确定当前治疗进展的应用。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00704-7.
4
Defining electronic-prescribing and infusion-related medication errors in paediatric intensive care - a Delphi study.定义儿科重症监护中与电子医嘱和输液相关的用药错误——一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Dec 7;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0713-8.
5
Criteria for Critical Care Infants and Children: PICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage Practice Statement and Levels of Care Guidance.危重症婴幼儿标准:PICU 收治、出院和分诊实施声明和分级护理指南。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):847-887. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001963.
6
Consensus Recommendations for Blood Culture Use in Critically Ill Children Using a Modified Delphi Approach.使用改良 Delphi 法对危重症儿童血液培养应用的共识推荐意见。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 1;22(9):774-784. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002749.
7
Incidence, location and reasons for avoidable in-hospital cardiac arrest in a district general hospital.一家区综合医院中可避免的院内心脏骤停的发生率、发生位置及原因
Resuscitation. 2002 Aug;54(2):115-23. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00098-9.
8
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Expert Consensus for the Resuscitation of Patients Who Arrest After Cardiac Surgery.胸外科医师协会心脏手术后心脏骤停患者复苏专家共识
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Mar;103(3):1005-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.033. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
9
Latin American Consensus for Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation 2017: Latin American Pediatric Critical Care Society Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Committee.2017 年拉丁美洲儿童心肺复苏共识:拉丁美洲儿科危重病学会儿童心肺复苏委员会。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;19(3):e152-e156. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001427.
10
Defining definitions: a Delphi study to develop a core outcome set for conditions of severe maternal morbidity.定义定义:一项德尔菲研究,旨在为严重产妇发病率的条件制定核心结局集。
BJOG. 2019 Feb;126(3):394-401. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14833. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Hot and Cold Debriefs for In-hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Mixed-methods Analysis.儿科重症监护病房院内心脏骤停的冷热汇报特征:一项混合方法分析
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2025 May 1;10(3):e812. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000812. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
2
A Novel Situational Awareness Scoring System in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.一种用于儿科心脏重症监护病房患者的新型情景意识评分系统。
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2022 Feb 18;13(4):352-355. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742675. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Defining Physiological Decompensation: An Expert Consensus and Retrospective Outcome Validation.

本文引用的文献

1
Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study.支持 ICU 中生命维持治疗决策过程的框架:德尔菲研究的结果。
Crit Care Med. 2020 May;48(5):645-653. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221.
2
Annual Incidence of Adult and Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States.美国成人及儿童住院期间心脏骤停的年发病率。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jul 9;12(7):e005580.
3
Cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit: An assessment of preventability.重症监护病房中的心脏骤停:可预防性评估。
定义生理失代偿:专家共识与回顾性结局验证
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):e0677. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000677. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
A Trigger and Response System for Preventing Cardiac Arrest in the ICU.一种用于预防重症监护病房心脏骤停的触发与响应系统。
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Oct 18;3(10):e0557. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000557. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Resuscitation. 2019 Dec;145:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
The incidence of cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.重症监护病房中心脏骤停的发生率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2019 May;20(2):144-154. doi: 10.1177/1751143718774713. Epub 2018 May 10.
5
No more pediatric code blues on the floor: evolution of pediatric rapid response teams and situational awareness plans.病房里不再有儿科急救情况:儿科快速反应团队及态势感知计划的演变
Transl Pediatr. 2018 Oct;7(4):291-298. doi: 10.21037/tp.2018.09.12.
6
Outcomes of 'unrecognised situation awareness failures events' in intensive care unit transfer of children in a Japanese children's hospital.日本一家儿童医院中儿童重症监护病房转运时“未识别的情境意识失败事件”的结局
J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Feb;55(2):213-215. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14185. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
7
Reducing Serious Safety Events and Priority Hospital-Acquired Conditions in a Pediatric Hospital with the Implementation of a Patient Safety Program.通过实施患者安全计划减少儿科医院的严重安全事件和重点医院获得性疾病
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Jun;44(6):334-340. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 May 3.
8
Paediatric traumatic cardiac arrest: a Delphi study to establish consensus on definition and management.儿科创伤性心搏骤停:一项德尔菲研究,旨在就定义和管理达成共识。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jul;35(7):434-439. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207226. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
9
Watcher Initiative Associated With Decrease in Failure to Rescue Events in Pediatric Population.观察者倡议与儿科人群中抢救失败事件的减少相关。
Hosp Pediatr. 2017 Dec;7(12):710-715. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2017-0042. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
Avoiding adult in-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study to determine preventability.避免成人院内心脏骤停:一项旨在确定可预防因素的回顾性队列研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2018 Jul;31(4):219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jul 19.