Djamshidian Atbin, Mulhall Jennifer, Tomassini Alessandro, Crotty Grace, Warner Thomas T, Lees Andrew, O'Sullivan Sean S, Averbeck Bruno B
Reta Lila Weston Institute for Neurological Studies and Department of Molecular Neuroscience University of London London United Kingdom.
Department of Neurology Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2014 Jul 31;1(4):325-328. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12076. eCollection 2014 Dec.
The aim of this study was to assess the neuropsychological behavior of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with addictive behaviors. Characteristically, these patients have younger onset of PD, higher novelty-seeking personality traits, jump to conclusions, and often make irrational choices. We assessed whether PD patients with and without addictive behaviors have deficits in a sequential sampling task, often called the secretary problem. In this task, participants needed to pick the best out of multiple offers. Critically, once participants rejected a deal, this option became unavailable. Thus, decisions needed to be balanced not to stop too soon or sample for too long and miss the best deal. We tested 13 PD patients with and 13 patients without addictive behaviors. Results were compared to healthy volunteers. We found that all patients declined fewer options before committing to a deal. There was, however, no difference between the two patient groups. Furthermore, there was no difference in overall choice rank between patients and controls. These results suggest that, compared to controls, PD patients gather less evidence before committing to an offer, but have no deficits in recognizing the best deal out of many options, regardless of whether or not they have addictive behaviors.
本研究的目的是评估有成瘾行为的帕金森病(PD)患者的神经心理行为。这些患者的特点是帕金森病发病年龄较轻,具有较高的寻求新奇人格特质,容易匆忙下结论,且常做出非理性选择。我们评估了有和没有成瘾行为的帕金森病患者在一项通常称为秘书问题的序贯抽样任务中是否存在缺陷。在这项任务中,参与者需要从多个提议中选出最佳选项。关键在于,一旦参与者拒绝了一项交易,该选项就不可用了。因此,决策需要保持平衡,既不能过早停止,也不能抽样时间过长而错过最佳交易。我们测试了13名有成瘾行为的帕金森病患者和13名没有成瘾行为的患者。将结果与健康志愿者进行了比较。我们发现,所有患者在确定交易前拒绝的选项较少。然而,两组患者之间没有差异。此外,患者和对照组在总体选择排名上没有差异。这些结果表明,与对照组相比,帕金森病患者在确定提议前收集的证据较少,但无论是否有成瘾行为,他们在从多个选项中识别最佳交易方面没有缺陷。