• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雇主为保护工人健康花费多少?

What do employers spend to protect the health of workers?

机构信息

Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 May 1;45(3):308-311. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3778. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

DOI:10.5271/sjweh.3778
PMID:30365039
Abstract

Objective This study aimed to estimate firm-level expenditures on occupational health and safety (OHS) for a representative sample of Canadian employers. Methods A cross-sectional survey of 334 employers with ≥20 employees in 18 economic sectors in the Ontario economy. Participants provided information on five dimensions of OHS expenditures: (i) organizational management and supervision; (ii) staff training in health and safety; (iii) personal protective equipment; (iv) professional services and, (v) estimates of the share of new capital investment that could be attributed to improved OHS performance. Expenditures for each of the five dimensions were summed for each organization and divided by the number of employees, resulting in an estimate of OHS expenditure per employee per year. Results The average OHS expenditure per worker per year was Can$1303 [95% confidence interval (CI) Can$1167-1454]. Expenditures were three times higher in the goods-producing sectors (Can$2417, 95% CI Can$2026-2809) relative to the service sectors (Can$847, 95% CI Can$777-915). The proportion of expenditures allocated to each of the five dimensions was generally consistent across economic sectors: 58% to organizational management and supervision, 22% to staff training in health and safety and 14% to personal protective equipment. On average, <5% of OHS expenditures per worker per year were allocated to professional services or estimated as the share of new capital investment attributed to OHS. Conclusions Employer expenditures on OHS are substantial. The results of this study are consistent with recent European estimates and strengthen understanding of the scale of employer financial expenditures to protect the health of workers.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在估算加拿大代表性雇主群体在职业健康与安全(OHS)方面的企业支出。

方法 对安大略省经济中 18 个经济部门中拥有≥20 名员工的 334 家雇主进行横断面调查。参与者提供了关于 OHS 支出五个维度的信息:(i)组织管理和监督;(ii)员工健康和安全培训;(iii)个人防护设备;(iv)专业服务,以及(v)可归因于 OHS 绩效提高的新资本投资份额的估计。对每个组织的五个维度的支出进行汇总,并除以员工人数,得出每个员工每年的 OHS 支出估计值。

结果 平均每位工人每年的 OHS 支出为 1303 加元(95%置信区间[CI] 1167-1454 加元)。与服务部门(Can$777-915,95%CI)相比,生产部门(Can$2417,95%CI Can$2026-2809)的每位工人每年的 OHS 支出高出三倍。五个维度的支出分配比例在各经济部门之间基本一致:组织管理和监督占 58%,员工健康和安全培训占 22%,个人防护设备占 14%。平均而言,每年每位工人的 OHS 支出中,不到 5%用于专业服务或估计为归因于 OHS 的新资本投资份额。

结论 雇主在 OHS 方面的支出相当可观。本研究结果与最近的欧洲估计一致,加强了对雇主保护工人健康的财务支出规模的理解。

相似文献

1
What do employers spend to protect the health of workers?雇主为保护工人健康花费多少?
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 May 1;45(3):308-311. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3778. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
2
Does the company's economic performance affect access to occupational health services?公司的经济业绩是否会影响获得职业健康服务的机会?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Sep 2;9:156. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-156.
3
Evaluation of occupational health service in the wood processing industry--determination of employee satisfaction.木材加工业职业健康服务评估——员工满意度测定
Occup Med (Lond). 1997 Feb;47(2):95-100. doi: 10.1093/occmed/47.2.95.
4
Promoting prevention with economic arguments - the case of Finnish occupational health services.运用经济论据推动预防工作——以芬兰职业健康服务为例。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Apr 22;8:130. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-130.
5
Larger Workplaces, People-Oriented Culture, and Specific Industry Sectors Are Associated with Co-Occurring Health Protection and Wellness Activities.规模较大的工作场所、以人为本的文化以及特定行业领域与同时开展的健康保护和促进健康活动相关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 4;15(12):2739. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122739.
6
Certification and quality assurance in Dutch occupational health services.荷兰职业健康服务中的认证与质量保证。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2002;15(2):173-7.
7
[Economic aspects of functioning of the occupational health services. Proposed directions of the changes].[职业健康服务运作的经济方面。变革的建议方向]
Med Pr. 1990;41(4):270-5.
8
Collaboration between employers and occupational health service providers: a systematic review of key characteristics.雇主与职业健康服务提供者之间的合作:关键特征的系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3924-x.
9
A global survey on occupational health services in selected international commission on occupational health (ICOH) member countries.对选定的国际职业卫生委员会(ICOH)成员国职业卫生服务的全球调查。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 5;17(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4800-z.
10
Hong Kong domestic health spending: financial years 1989/90 to 2011/12.香港本地医疗支出:1989/90至2011/12财政年度
Hong Kong Med J. 2015 Jun;21(3 Suppl 3):1-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Do occupational health and safety tools that utilize artificial intelligence have a measurable impact on worker injury or illness? Findings from a systematic review.利用人工智能的职业健康与安全工具对工人受伤或患病是否有可衡量的影响?一项系统评价的结果
Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 11;14(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02869-1.