J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018;32(4):400-408. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2137.
To investigate the test-retest reliability of mechanical sensitivity mapping in the masseter and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) regions between sessions, days, and examiners with a fixed and standardized pressure stimulus, as well as to compare mechanical sensitivity between sides and sites.
A total of 20 healthy young volunteers participated. Pressure stimulation was applied to 15 sites in the masseter region with a Palpeter device of 1.0-kg force and to 9 sites in the TMJ region with a Palpeter of 0.5-kg force. All participants were tested twice in two separate sessions on the same day by Examiner 1 with an interval of 3 hours between tests. After 1 week, the protocol was repeated in the same manner in two separate sessions by Examiner 1 and Examiner 2 (one session each).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of numeric rating scale (NRS) scores and center of gravity (COG) values in both regions showed no significant main effects of examiner, day, or session (P ≥ .167). The test-retest reliability of data implied excellent agreement (intra-class correlation coefficients all > 0.75) between different examiners, days, and sessions. In addition, the ANOVA of the mean NRS scores in both regions showed significant main effects of site (P = .001).
This feasible and reliable technique may provide a new tool for comprehensive evaluation of mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia in the orofacial region, which are common features related to temporomandibular disorders and other chronic craniofacial pain conditions.
研究在固定和标准化压力刺激下,个体间、个体内、个体内不同时间点之间,使用机械敏感图检测咀嚼肌和颞下颌关节(TMJ)区域机械敏感性的测试-再测试信度,并比较两侧和各部位之间的机械敏感性。
共有 20 名健康的年轻志愿者参与。使用 Palpeter 设备以 1.0 千克力的压力刺激咀嚼肌区域的 15 个部位,以 0.5 千克力的压力刺激 TMJ 区域的 9 个部位。所有参与者在同一天的两次独立测试中,由 Examiner 1 在两次测试之间间隔 3 小时进行测试,共测试两次。一周后,Examiner 1 和 Examiner 2 以相同的方式在两次独立的测试中重复该方案(各一次)。
对两个区域的数字评分量表(NRS)评分和重心(COG)值进行方差分析(ANOVA),结果显示 examiner、day 和 session 无显著主效应(P≥.167)。数据的测试-再测试信度表明不同 examiner、day 和 session 之间具有极好的一致性(组内相关系数均>0.75)。此外,两个区域的平均 NRS 评分的 ANOVA 显示部位有显著的主效应(P=0.001)。
这项可行且可靠的技术可能为评估口面部机械性痛觉过敏和超敏提供一种新的工具,这些都是与颞下颌关节紊乱症和其他慢性颅面疼痛相关的常见特征。