Suppr超能文献

客观评估的日本老年人久坐行为模式和报告的行为领域。

Objectively-Assessed Patterns and Reported Domains of Sedentary Behavior Among Japanese Older Adults.

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba.

Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University.

出版信息

J Epidemiol. 2019 Sep 5;29(9):334-339. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20180041. Epub 2018 Oct 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prolonged periods of sitting time can be adversely associated with older adults' well-being and functional capacities. Understanding patterns and contexts of sedentary behaviors (SB) can inform approaches to prevention. This study examined Japanese older adults' objectively-assessed patterns and reported domains of SB and their interrelationships.

METHODS

Participants (n = 297; aged 65-84 years) of this cross-sectional study wore an accelerometer for 7 days and completed a survey. Five measures related to SB patterns were identified from the accelerometer data. SB from six domains, socio-demographics, and chronic conditions were identified from the survey data. Relative contributions of six domains to objectively-measured prolonged sedentary time (≥30 minutes) and the number of breaks were examined in a series of multivariate linear regressions. Covariates were socio-demographics, chronic conditions, and accelerometer wear time.

RESULTS

On average, participants spent 8.8 hours a day sedentary (58% of accelerometer wear time), with 7.6 breaks per sedentary hour, and 3.7 hours a day through prolonged sedentary bouts (4.4 time/day). The proportions of time in the SB domains were 9.4% for car, 4.0% for public transport, 6.1% for work, 45.5% for television (TV) viewing, 9.8% for computer use, and 25.1% for other leisure. Domains of SB that contributed significantly to longer sedentary time through prolonged bouts were TV viewing and computer use. TV viewing was also associated with a lesser number of breaks.

CONCLUSIONS

For Japanese older adults, initiatives to address SB could focus on breaking-up prolonged periods of SB by encouraging more frequent breaks, especially during TV viewing.

摘要

背景

久坐时间过长可能会对老年人的健康和功能能力产生不利影响。了解久坐行为的模式和背景可以为预防措施提供信息。本研究考察了日本老年人的客观评估模式和报告的久坐行为领域及其相互关系。

方法

这项横断面研究的参与者(n=297;年龄 65-84 岁)佩戴加速度计 7 天,并完成了一项调查。从加速度计数据中确定了与 SB 模式相关的五个指标。从调查数据中确定了六个领域的 SB、社会人口统计学和慢性疾病。在一系列多元线性回归中,检查了六个领域对客观测量的长时间久坐(≥30 分钟)和休息次数的相对贡献。协变量为社会人口统计学、慢性疾病和加速度计佩戴时间。

结果

参与者平均每天坐着 8.8 小时(占加速度计佩戴时间的 58%),每小时休息 7.6 次,每天有 3.7 小时处于长时间久坐状态(4.4 次/天)。SB 领域的时间比例分别为 9.4%用于汽车、4.0%用于公共交通、6.1%用于工作、45.5%用于看电视(TV)、9.8%用于计算机使用和 25.1%用于其他休闲。通过长时间久坐段对较长久坐时间有显著贡献的 SB 领域是看电视和使用计算机。看电视也与休息次数较少有关。

结论

对于日本老年人,解决 SB 的措施可以侧重于通过鼓励更频繁的休息来打断长时间的 SB,尤其是在看电视期间。

相似文献

1
Objectively-Assessed Patterns and Reported Domains of Sedentary Behavior Among Japanese Older Adults.
J Epidemiol. 2019 Sep 5;29(9):334-339. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20180041. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
3
Physical activity and sedentary behaviour of adults with mental illness.
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Jul;19(7):579-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.07.017. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
4
Accelerometer-Measured Diurnal Patterns of Sedentary Behavior among Japanese Workers: A Descriptive Epidemiological Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 27;17(11):3814. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113814.
8
10

引用本文的文献

4
Behavioral patterns in elderly single-person households.
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 10;10(20):e39069. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39069. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
8
Review on the management of cardiovascular risk factors in the elderly.
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 Nov 28;19(11):894-927. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.11.008.
10
Profiles of sedentary behaviors in the oldest old: findings from the National Health and Aging Trends Study.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Sep;34(9):2071-2079. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02157-1. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and Reliability of Japanese-Language Self-reported Measures for Assessing Adults Domain-Specific Sedentary Time.
J Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 5;28(3):149-155. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170002. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
2
Comparability of activity monitors used in Asian and Western-country studies for assessing free-living sedentary behaviour.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0186523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186523. eCollection 2017.
4
Sedentary time in older men and women: an international consensus statement and research priorities.
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;51(21):1526-1532. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097209. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
5
Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8.
6
Associations of Total and Domain-Specific Sedentary Time With Type 2 Diabetes in Taiwanese Older Adults.
J Epidemiol. 2016 Jul 5;26(7):348-54. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150095. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
7
Patterns of Sedentary Behavior in US Middle-Age and Older Adults: The REGARDS Study.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Mar;48(3):430-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000792.
8
Breaking-up sedentary time is associated with impairment in activities of daily living.
Exp Gerontol. 2015 Dec;72:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
10
Gender and Age Differences in Hourly and Daily Patterns of Sedentary Time in Older Adults Living in Retirement Communities.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 21;10(8):e0136161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136161. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验