Department of Preventive Gerontology, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 24;9(2):e021690. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021690.
To examine patterns of sedentary behaviour and physical activity, among Japanese workers with differing occupational activity types.
A cross-sectional observational study in 2013-2015.
Two local communities in Japan.
Full-time workers aged 40-64 years (n=345; 55% men) and who lived in two cities.
From accelerometer data for 7 days, mean overall sedentary time, prolonged bouts of sedentary time and light-and moderate-to vigorous-intensity of physical activity (LPA and MVPA) as a proportion of accelerometer wear time and number of breaks per sedentary hour were identified for four time periods: working hours, workdays, non-work hours and non-workdays. These sedentary behaviour and physical activity measures in the four time periods were examined among workers with four self-attributed occupational activity types (mainly sitting, standing, walking, and physical labour), adjusting for sociodemographic attributes. Diurnal patterns of sedentary behaviour, LPA, and MVPA were examined.
In working hours, those with a sitting job had significantly more total and prolonged sedentary time (total: p<0.001; prolonged: p<0.01) along with less LPA (p<0.001) and MVPA (p<0.001) and less frequent breaks (p<0.01), compared with those with the three more active job type. Similar differences by job type were found for the whole working day, but not for prolonged sedentary time and breaks. On non-working hours and days, differences in sedentary and physically active patterns by job type were not apparent.
Occupational activity type is related to overall sedentary time and patterns on working days, but not to leisure-time sitting and activity patterns, which were similar across the sitting, standing, walking, and physical labour occupational activity types.
研究不同职业活动类型的日本工人的久坐行为和体力活动模式。
2013-2015 年的横断面观察性研究。
日本的两个社区。
年龄在 40-64 岁之间(55%为男性)、居住在两个城市的全职工人。
通过 7 天的加速度计数据,确定了四个时间段(工作时间、工作日、非工作时间和非工作日)的平均总久坐时间、长时间久坐时间、轻体力活动和中高强度体力活动(LPA 和 MVPA)占加速度计佩戴时间的比例和每静坐小时的休息次数。在调整社会人口统计学特征后,对四种自我归因的职业活动类型(主要坐姿、站立、行走和体力劳动)的工人在四个时间段内的久坐行为和体力活动措施进行了检查。还检查了久坐行为、LPA 和 MVPA 的昼夜模式。
在工作时间内,与三种更活跃的工作类型相比,从事坐式工作的人总久坐时间和长时间久坐时间显著更长(总时间:p<0.001;长时间:p<0.01),LPA(p<0.001)和 MVPA(p<0.001)较少,休息次数也较少(p<0.01)。在整个工作日,也存在类似的工作类型差异,但长时间久坐时间和休息次数除外。在非工作时间和非工作日,工作类型的久坐和体力活动模式差异不明显。
职业活动类型与工作日的总体久坐时间和模式有关,但与闲暇时间的久坐和活动模式无关,这与坐姿、站立、行走和体力劳动的职业活动类型相似。