• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子学习系统中学生参与度的预测及其对学生课程评估分数的影响。

Student Engagement Predictions in an e-Learning System and Their Impact on Student Course Assessment Scores.

机构信息

School of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, Baoshan District, Post Code 200444 Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018 Oct 2;2018:6347186. doi: 10.1155/2018/6347186. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1155/2018/6347186
PMID:30369946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6189675/
Abstract

Several challenges are associated with e-learning systems, the most significant of which is the lack of student motivation in various course activities and for various course materials. In this study, we used machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify low-engagement students in a social science course at the Open University (OU) to assess the effect of engagement on student performance. The input variables of the study included , , , and the number of clicks on virtual learning environment (VLE) activities, which included , , , , , , , , during the first course assessment. The output variable was the student level of engagement in the various activities. To predict low-engagement students, we applied several ML algorithms to the dataset. Using these algorithms, trained models were first obtained; then, the accuracy and kappa values of the models were compared. The results demonstrated that the J48, decision tree, JRIP, and gradient-boosted classifiers exhibited better performance in terms of the accuracy, kappa value, and recall compared to the other tested models. Based on these findings, we developed a dashboard to facilitate instructor at the OU. These models can easily be incorporated into VLE systems to help instructors evaluate student engagement during VLE courses with regard to different activities and materials and to provide additional interventions for students in advance of their final exam. Furthermore, this study examined the relationship between student engagement and the course assessment score.

摘要

电子学习系统面临着一些挑战,其中最显著的是学生在各种课程活动和课程材料中缺乏动机。在这项研究中,我们使用机器学习 (ML) 算法来识别开放大学 (OU) 社会科学课程中的低参与度学生,以评估参与度对学生表现的影响。研究的输入变量包括性别、年龄、先前的学术成绩和对虚拟学习环境 (VLE) 活动的点击次数,其中包括课程资料、测验、讨论区、课程评估、虚拟导师会议和测验反馈,在第一门课程评估期间。输出变量是学生对各种活动的参与程度。为了预测低参与度的学生,我们将几种机器学习算法应用于数据集。使用这些算法,首先获得了经过训练的模型;然后,比较了模型的准确性和 kappa 值。结果表明,J48、决策树、JRIP 和梯度提升分类器在准确性、kappa 值和召回率方面的表现优于其他测试模型。基于这些发现,我们开发了一个仪表板,以方便 OU 的教师使用。这些模型可以很容易地整合到 VLE 系统中,以帮助教师评估 VLE 课程中学生在不同活动和材料方面的参与度,并在学生期末考试前为他们提供额外的干预措施。此外,本研究还考察了学生参与度与课程评估分数之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/bd1570a01d81/CIN2018-6347186.alg.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/0a3dafc64c96/CIN2018-6347186.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/79175947d455/CIN2018-6347186.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/5f64247d2e26/CIN2018-6347186.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/fa3481c06198/CIN2018-6347186.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/72b46bae3771/CIN2018-6347186.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/b60fc5da308d/CIN2018-6347186.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/6805a064a752/CIN2018-6347186.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/b3119bd71f79/CIN2018-6347186.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/72f550f6f992/CIN2018-6347186.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/482605fde05c/CIN2018-6347186.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/1064b4ec405c/CIN2018-6347186.011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/bd1570a01d81/CIN2018-6347186.alg.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/0a3dafc64c96/CIN2018-6347186.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/79175947d455/CIN2018-6347186.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/5f64247d2e26/CIN2018-6347186.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/fa3481c06198/CIN2018-6347186.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/72b46bae3771/CIN2018-6347186.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/b60fc5da308d/CIN2018-6347186.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/6805a064a752/CIN2018-6347186.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/b3119bd71f79/CIN2018-6347186.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/72f550f6f992/CIN2018-6347186.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/482605fde05c/CIN2018-6347186.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/1064b4ec405c/CIN2018-6347186.011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/220e/6189675/bd1570a01d81/CIN2018-6347186.alg.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Student Engagement Predictions in an e-Learning System and Their Impact on Student Course Assessment Scores.电子学习系统中学生参与度的预测及其对学生课程评估分数的影响。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018 Oct 2;2018:6347186. doi: 10.1155/2018/6347186. eCollection 2018.
2
Remote Learning in Transnational Education: Relationship between Virtual Learning Engagement and Student Academic Performance in BSc Pharmaceutical Biotechnology.跨国教育中的远程学习:理学学士制药生物技术专业虚拟学习参与度与学生学业成绩之间的关系
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Dec 27;10(1):4. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10010004.
3
Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses.评估学生应答系统在广泛的生物学课程中对学生学习和态度的影响。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Spring;6(1):29-41. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0190.
4
A new ML-based approach to enhance student engagement in online environment.基于机器学习的新方法提高学生在线环境中的参与度。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 10;16(11):e0258788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258788. eCollection 2021.
5
The relationship between student engagement with online content and achievement in a blended learning anatomy course.混合式学习解剖课程中学生对在线内容的参与度与学习成绩之间的关系。
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;11(5):471-477. doi: 10.1002/ase.1761. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
6
How Knowledge Stock Exchanges can increase student success in Massive Open Online Courses.知识交易所如何提高大规模在线开放课程中学生的成功率。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0223064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223064. eCollection 2019.
7
Assessment of the quality of interaction in distance learning programmes utilizing the Internet or interactive television: perceptions of students and lecturers.利用互联网或交互式电视的远程学习课程中互动质量的评估:学生和讲师的看法。
Med Teach. 2006 Feb;28(1):e1-9. doi: 10.1080/01421590600568439.
8
How the study of online collaborative learning can guide teachers and predict students' performance in a medical course.在线协作学习研究如何指导教师并预测医学课程中学生的表现。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Feb 6;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1126-1.
9
Assessing student engagement and self-regulated learning in a medical gross anatomy course.评估医学大体解剖学课程中学生的参与度和自主学习情况。
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):104-10. doi: 10.1002/ase.1463. Epub 2014 May 20.
10
Managing university e-learning environments and academic achievement in the United Arab Emirates: An instructor and student perspective.管理阿联酋的大学电子学习环境和学术成就:教师和学生的视角。
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0268338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268338. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatic engagement estimation in smart education/learning settings: a systematic review of engagement definitions, datasets, and methods.智能教育/学习环境中的自动参与度评估:参与度定义、数据集和方法的系统综述
Smart Learn Environ. 2022;9(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00212-y. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
2
Personalized learning in hybrid education.混合式教育中的个性化学习。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 25;15(1):18176. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03361-5.
3
Implementation of a Virtual Cardiology Curriculum to Address the Deficit of Cardiovascular Education in Haiti.

本文引用的文献

1
Open University Learning Analytics dataset.开放大学学习分析数据集。
Sci Data. 2017 Nov 28;4:170171. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.171.
2
Data-driven system to predict academic grades and dropout.用于预测学业成绩和辍学情况的数据驱动系统。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 14;12(2):e0171207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171207. eCollection 2017.
3
Gene selection in cancer classification using sparse logistic regression with Bayesian regularization.使用带贝叶斯正则化的稀疏逻辑回归进行癌症分类中的基因选择。
实施虚拟心脏病学课程以解决海地心血管教育不足的问题。
JACC Adv. 2024 Dec 26;3(12):101380. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101380. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Which videos are better for the students? Analyzing the student behavior and video metadata.哪些视频对学生更有益?分析学生行为和视频元数据。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 24;10(21):e39682. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39682. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
5
Academic achievement prediction in higher education through interpretable modeling.通过可解释建模预测高等教育中的学业成就。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 5;19(9):e0309838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309838. eCollection 2024.
6
Factors affecting Saudi medical students' engagement during synchronous and asynchronous eLearning and their impacts on the students' academic achievement: a national survey.影响沙特医学生在同步和异步电子学习中参与度的因素及其对学生学业成绩的影响:一项全国性调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05323-3.
7
Artificial Intelligence developments in medical education: a conceptual and practical framework.医学教育中的人工智能发展:一个概念与实践框架。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Oct 26;9:239. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000239.1. eCollection 2020.
8
From multimodal features to behavioural inferences: A pipeline to model engagement in human-robot interactions.从多模态特征到行为推断:用于建模人机交互中参与度的流水线。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 8;18(11):e0285749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285749. eCollection 2023.
9
Exercise makes better mind: a data mining study on effect of physical activity on academic achievement of college students.运动塑造更聪慧的头脑:一项关于体育活动对大学生学业成绩影响的数据挖掘研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 16;14:1271431. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1271431. eCollection 2023.
10
Recent advances in Predictive Learning Analytics: A decade systematic review (2012-2022).预测性学习分析的最新进展:十年系统综述(2012 - 2022)
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022 Dec 20:1-35. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11536-0.
Bioinformatics. 2006 Oct 1;22(19):2348-55. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl386. Epub 2006 Jul 14.