1 Biomedical MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
2 Department of Pediatric Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019 Feb;39(2):189-209. doi: 10.1177/0271678X18809547. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
The mammalian brain is composed of densely connected and interacting regions, which form structural and functional networks. An improved understanding of the structure-function relation is crucial to understand the structural underpinnings of brain function and brain plasticity after injury. It is currently unclear how functional connectivity strength relates to structural connectivity strength. We obtained an overview of recent papers that report on correspondences between quantitative functional and structural connectivity measures in the mammalian brain. We included network studies in which functional connectivity was measured with resting-state fMRI, and structural connectivity with either diffusion-weighted MRI or neuronal tract tracers. Twenty-seven of the 28 included studies showed a positive structure-function relationship. Large inter-study variations were found comparing functional connectivity strength with either quantitative diffusion-based (correlation coefficient (r) ranges: 0.18-0.82) or neuronal tracer-based structural connectivity measures (r = 0.24-0.74). Two functional datasets demonstrated lower structure-function correlations with neuronal tracer-based (r = 0.22 and r = 0.30) than with diffusion-based measures (r = 0.49 and r = 0.65). The robust positive quantitative structure-function relationship supports the hypothesis that structural connectivity provides the hardware from which functional connectivity emerges. However, methodological differences between the included studies complicate the comparison across studies, which emphasize the need for validation and standardization in brain structure-function studies.
哺乳动物的大脑由密集连接和相互作用的区域组成,这些区域形成了结构和功能网络。更好地理解结构-功能关系对于理解大脑功能的结构基础和损伤后的大脑可塑性至关重要。目前尚不清楚功能连接强度与结构连接强度如何相关。我们对最近的一些报告进行了综述,这些报告涉及哺乳动物大脑中定量功能和结构连接测量之间的对应关系。我们纳入了使用静息态 fMRI 测量功能连接,以及使用扩散加权 MRI 或神经元示踪剂测量结构连接的网络研究。28 项研究中有 27 项显示出正的结构-功能关系。比较功能连接强度与基于定量扩散的结构连接测量(相关系数 (r) 范围:0.18-0.82)或基于神经元示踪剂的结构连接测量(r=0.24-0.74)时,研究间存在较大的差异。两个功能数据集显示,与基于神经元示踪剂的测量(r=0.22 和 r=0.30)相比,与基于扩散的测量(r=0.49 和 r=0.65)的结构-功能相关性更低。这种强有力的正定量结构-功能关系支持了这样一种假设,即结构连接提供了功能连接出现的硬件。然而,纳入研究之间的方法学差异使得跨研究的比较变得复杂,这强调了在大脑结构-功能研究中需要验证和标准化。