Peterson Kirsten L, Sanchez-Romero Ruben, Mill Ravi D, Cole Michael W
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 22:2023.09.16.558065. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.16.558065.
Functional connectivity (FC) has been invaluable for understanding the brain's communication network, with strong potential for enhanced FC approaches to yield additional insights. Unlike with the fMRI field-standard method of pairwise correlation, theory suggests that partial correlation can estimate FC without confounded and indirect connections. However, partial correlation FC can also display low repeat reliability, impairing the accuracy of individual estimates. We hypothesized that reliability would be increased by adding regularization, which can reduce overfitting to noise in regression-based approaches like partial correlation. We therefore tested several regularized alternatives - graphical lasso, graphical ridge, and principal component regression - against unregularized partial and pairwise correlation, applying them to empirical resting-state fMRI and simulated data. As hypothesized, regularization vastly improved reliability, quantified using between-session similarity and intraclass correlation. This enhanced reliability then granted substantially more accurate individual FC estimates when validated against structural connectivity (empirical data) and ground truth networks (simulations). Graphical lasso showed especially high accuracy among regularized approaches, seemingly by maintaining more valid underlying network structures. We additionally found graphical lasso to be robust to noise levels, data quantity, and subject motion - common fMRI error sources. Lastly, we demonstrated that resting-state graphical lasso FC can effectively predict fMRI task activations and individual differences in behavior, further establishing its reliability, external validity, and ability to characterize task-related functionality. We recommend graphical lasso or similar regularized methods for calculating FC, as they can yield more valid estimates of unconfounded connectivity than field-standard pairwise correlation, while overcoming the poor reliability of unregularized partial correlation.
功能连接性(FC)对于理解大脑的通信网络具有重要价值,增强FC方法具有很大潜力,有望带来更多见解。与功能磁共振成像(fMRI)领域的成对相关标准方法不同,理论表明偏相关可以在不考虑混淆和间接连接的情况下估计FC。然而,偏相关FC也可能显示出较低的重复可靠性,从而影响个体估计的准确性。我们假设通过添加正则化可以提高可靠性,正则化可以减少基于回归的方法(如偏相关)中对噪声的过度拟合。因此,我们针对未正则化的偏相关和成对相关测试了几种正则化替代方法——图拉索法、图岭回归法和主成分回归法,并将它们应用于经验性静息态fMRI和模拟数据。正如我们所假设的,正则化极大地提高了可靠性,我们使用会话间相似性和组内相关性进行了量化。当与结构连接性(经验数据)和真实网络(模拟数据)进行验证时,这种增强的可靠性使得个体FC估计更加准确。在正则化方法中,图拉索法显示出特别高的准确性,这似乎是因为它保留了更多有效的潜在网络结构。我们还发现图拉索法对噪声水平、数据量和受试者运动(常见的fMRI误差来源)具有鲁棒性。最后,我们证明静息态图拉索FC可以有效地预测fMRI任务激活和行为中的个体差异,进一步确立了其可靠性、外部有效性以及表征任务相关功能的能力。我们建议使用图拉索法或类似的正则化方法来计算FC,因为它们比领域标准的成对相关能够产生更有效的无混淆连接估计,同时克服了未正则化偏相关可靠性差的问题。