Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI02881, USA.
Children's Healthy Weight Research Group, UNC Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Feb;22(2):223-234. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002665. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
To describe the modification and validation of an existing instrument, the Environment and Policy Assessment and Observation (EPAO), to better capture provider feeding practices.
Modifications to the EPAO were made, validity assessed through expert review, pilot tested and then used to collect follow-up data during a two-day home visit from an ongoing cluster-randomized trial. Exploratory factor analysis investigated the underlying factor structure of the feeding practices. To test predictive validity of the factors, multilevel mixed models examined associations between factors and child's diet quality as captured by the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) score (measured via the Dietary Observation in Childcare Protocol).
Family childcare homes (FCCH) in Rhode Island and North Carolina, USA.ParticipantsThe modified EPAO was pilot tested with fifty-three FCCH and then used to collect data in 133 FCCH.
The final three-factor solution ('coercive control and indulgent feeding practices', 'autonomy support practices', 'negative role modelling') captured 43 % of total variance. In multilevel mixed models adjusted for covariates, 'autonomy support practices' was positively associated with children's diet quality. A 1-unit increase in the use of 'autonomy support practices' was associated with a 9·4-unit increase in child HEI-2010 score (P=0·001).
Similar to the parenting literature, constructs which describe coercive controlling practices and those which describe autonomy-supportive practices emerged. Given that diets of pre-schoolers in the USA remain suboptimal, teaching childcare providers about supportive feeding practices may help improve children's diet quality.
描述对现有工具——环境、政策评估和观察工具(EPAO)的修改和验证,以更好地捕捉提供者的喂养行为。
对 EPAO 进行了修改,通过专家审查评估其有效性,进行试点测试,然后在一项正在进行的集群随机试验的为期两天的家访中收集后续数据。探索性因子分析研究了喂养行为的潜在因子结构。为了检验因子的预测有效性,多级混合模型检验了因子与儿童饮食质量(通过儿童保育饮食观察协议(Dietary Observation in Childcare Protocol)测量的健康饮食指数-2010 得分(HEI-2010))之间的关联。
美国罗德岛州和北卡罗来纳州的家庭日托中心(FCCH)。
修改后的 EPAO 对 53 个 FCCH 进行了试点测试,然后在 133 个 FCCH 中收集数据。
最终的三因素解决方案(“强制性控制和放纵喂养行为”、“自主支持行为”、“消极榜样行为”)解释了总方差的 43%。在调整了协变量的多级混合模型中,“自主支持行为”与儿童饮食质量呈正相关。“自主支持行为”使用量增加 1 个单位,儿童 HEI-2010 得分增加 9.4 个单位(P=0.001)。
与育儿文献类似,出现了描述强制性控制行为和描述自主支持行为的结构。鉴于美国学龄前儿童的饮食仍然不理想,向日托提供者教授支持性喂养行为可能有助于改善儿童的饮食质量。