WA Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care and Curtin Health and Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
J Palliat Med. 2011 Feb;14(2):191-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0229. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
There has recently been a call for an analysis of the way in which professionals see their role and status in the context of palliative care and the interdisciplinary team. This is particularly salient in the provision of psychosocial care.
This study qualitatively explored team members' perceptions and experiences of team dynamics. An in-depth qualitative research design was adopted using semistructured interviews and was guided by a social constructivist framework. Seven palliative care team members were recruited from across three palliative care sites. Two palliative care nurses, a palliative care medical specialist, a consultant psychiatrist, a social worker, a counselor, and an occupational therapist comprised our prototypical interdisciplinary team. Analysis was conducted using a method of constant comparison.
Two major themes emerged from our research: "Lack of clear role boundaries" and "Strategies for maintenance of role boundaries," which included: "Claiming access to specialist expertise and knowledge" and "Minimizing the knowledge of other professions and professionals." It is argued that effective team functioning can be enhanced through the development of interdisciplinary team training programs and policies, resources and structures that provide support for the interdisciplinary team model.
最近有人呼吁分析专业人员在姑息治疗和跨学科团队背景下如何看待自己的角色和地位。在提供心理社会关怀方面,这一点尤为突出。
本研究采用深入的定性研究设计,使用半结构化访谈,并以社会建构主义框架为指导。从三个姑息治疗地点招募了七名姑息治疗团队成员。两名姑息治疗护士、一名姑息治疗医学专家、一名顾问精神科医生、一名社会工作者、一名顾问和一名职业治疗师组成了我们的典型跨学科团队。分析采用恒定性比较方法进行。
我们的研究出现了两个主要主题:“缺乏明确的角色界限”和“维持角色界限的策略”,其中包括:“要求获得专业专家知识和技能”和“尽量减少对其他专业和专业人员的了解。”有人认为,通过制定跨学科团队培训计划和政策、提供支持跨学科团队模式的资源和结构,可以增强有效的团队运作。