Zhang Lin, Qiu Xiangmiao, Zhu Xi, Zou Xiaoyi, Chen Lei
Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Epilepsy Res. 2018 Dec;148:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
Decision-making (DM) is an essential ability in everyday life. Some studies have reported DM deficits in patients with epilepsy. However, the reliability of the conclusions was limited by small sample sizes and inconsistent results. This review evaluated the current evidence concerning DM ability in epilepsy to provide a more detailed understanding and reliable conclusions.
Seven databases were searched to collect studies about DM ability in epilepsy. The weighted mean difference (WMD), standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to compare continuous variables.
A total of 13 studies, including 395 patients with epilepsy, met our inclusion criteria. The overall size of DM deficits was moderate (SMD = -0.372, 95% CI = -0.529 - -0.215, p < 0.001). The performance of the Iowa Gambling Task were impaired (WMD = -11.961, 95% CI = -20.543 - -3.380, p = 0.006; SMD = -0.694, 95% CI = -0.856 - -0.532, <0.001). The performance of other DM tests was not significantly less in either WMD or SMD. Patients with right TLE and with left TLE had no statistically significant difference in DM ability. An amygdala or (and) hippocampus resection might be related to more severe DM deficits. Various cognitive domains were related to decision-making capacity, although these correlations were not consistent across studies.
Patients with epilepsy had poorer scores in avoid making risky decisions under ambiguity. Other types of DM ability might not be impaired; however, insufficient studies, with small samples, limited reliability of the results.
决策制定(DM)是日常生活中的一项基本能力。一些研究报告称癫痫患者存在决策制定缺陷。然而,这些结论的可靠性受到样本量小和结果不一致的限制。本综述评估了目前关于癫痫患者决策制定能力的证据,以提供更详细的理解和可靠的结论。
检索七个数据库以收集有关癫痫患者决策制定能力的研究。加权平均差(WMD)、标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)用于比较连续变量。
共有13项研究,包括395例癫痫患者,符合我们的纳入标准。决策制定缺陷的总体程度为中度(SMD = -0.372,95% CI = -0.529 - -0.215,p < 0.001)。爱荷华赌博任务的表现受损(WMD = -11.961,95% CI = -20.543 - -3.380,p = 0.006;SMD = -0.694,95% CI = -0.856 - -0.532,<0.001)。其他决策制定测试的表现无论是在WMD还是SMD方面均无显著降低。右侧颞叶癫痫患者和左侧颞叶癫痫患者在决策制定能力方面无统计学显著差异。杏仁核或(和)海马体切除可能与更严重的决策制定缺陷有关。尽管这些相关性在各研究中并不一致,但各种认知领域与决策制定能力相关。
癫痫患者在模糊情况下避免做出风险决策方面得分较低。其他类型的决策制定能力可能未受损;然而,研究不足,样本量小,结果的可靠性有限。