Rhee Joel J, Teo Patrick C K, Mitchell Geoffrey K, Senior Hugh E, Tan Aaron J H, Clayton Josephine M
School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Nov 1. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001531.
General practitioners (GPs) are well placed to be involved in end-of-life care for patients with life-limiting illnesses. However, differing views exist regarding their role. This study aims to explore the views of GPs and specialist palliative care clinicians (SPCCs) on the role that GPs should play in the planning and provision of end-of-life care and important barriers and facilitators to GPs' involvement in end-of-life care including suggestions for improvement.
Qualitative description methodology using semistructured interviews of 11 GPs and 10 SPCCs.
The participants identified two key roles that GPs should play in the planning and provision of end-of-life care: care planning and referring to palliative care services and being the primary clinician in charge of patient care. GPs and SPCCs expressed similar views; however, a significant proportion of the GP participants were not actively involved in end-of-life care. Factors affecting GPs' involvement in end-of-life care included: (1) GP and practice factors including continuity of care, long-term relationships with patients, knowledge and skills in end-of-life care, resource limitations and work patterns; (2) communication and collaboration between GPs and the acute healthcare system and (3) communication and collaboration between GPs and SPCCs.
GPs have a key role in the planning and provision of end-of-life care. GPs could be encouraged in this role by providing them with education and practical experience in end-of-life care, making changes to remuneration structure, formalised arrangements for shared care and encouraging continuity of care and developing long-term relationship with their patients.
全科医生(GP)非常适合参与到患有生命有限疾病患者的临终关怀中。然而,对于他们的角色存在不同观点。本研究旨在探讨全科医生和专科姑息治疗临床医生(SPCC)对于全科医生在临终关怀规划和提供中应扮演的角色,以及全科医生参与临终关怀的重要障碍和促进因素的看法,包括改进建议。
采用定性描述方法,对11名全科医生和10名专科姑息治疗临床医生进行半结构化访谈。
参与者确定了全科医生在临终关怀规划和提供中应扮演的两个关键角色:护理规划和转介至姑息治疗服务,以及作为负责患者护理的主要临床医生。全科医生和专科姑息治疗临床医生表达了相似的观点;然而,相当一部分全科医生参与者并未积极参与临终关怀。影响全科医生参与临终关怀的因素包括:(1)全科医生及诊所因素,包括护理连续性、与患者的长期关系、临终关怀知识和技能、资源限制和工作模式;(2)全科医生与急性医疗系统之间的沟通与协作;(3)全科医生与专科姑息治疗临床医生之间的沟通与协作。
全科医生在临终关怀的规划和提供中起着关键作用。可以通过为他们提供临终关怀方面的教育和实践经验、改变薪酬结构、制定共享护理的正式安排、鼓励护理连续性以及与患者建立长期关系来鼓励全科医生发挥这一作用。