• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健专业人员对在临终护理决策中支持患者及家庭照顾者的看法:一项专科姑息治疗的定性研究

Healthcare Professionals' Perspective on Supporting Patients and Family Caregivers in End-Of-Life Care Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study in Specialist Palliative Care.

作者信息

Featherstone Hannah J, McQuillan Regina, Foley Geraldine

机构信息

Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

St. Francis Hospice, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Nov 1:10499091241296860. doi: 10.1177/10499091241296860.

DOI:10.1177/10499091241296860
PMID:39485051
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare professionals in specialist palliative care have a key role in conducting end-of-life care discussions with patients and their family caregivers. We aimed to identify key barriers and facilitators for healthcare professionals in specialist palliative care to support patients and their family caregivers in decision-making for patient end-of-life care.

METHODS

Twenty-two healthcare professionals from different healthcare professions were recruited from a large regional specialist palliative care service in Ireland comprising 2 hospice sites. Five focus groups were conducted with participants. Data were member checked and analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Open communication and trusting relationships with patients and family caregivers combined with sufficient time for early and phased exploration of the patient's preferences for end-of-life care, were key facilitators for participants. Family caregivers keeping information from the patient, family misunderstanding about who is responsible for decision-making, and a lack of involvement of other specialties in end-of-life care discussions were perceived by participants as key barriers. Although participants indicated they had sufficient expertise to support patients in end-of-life care decision-making, they felt that end-of-life care discussions were not solely the responsibility of specialist palliative care services.

CONCLUSION

Open communication with patients in end-of-life care decision-making can be of central importance for healthcare professionals in specialist palliative care. Further research is needed to understand the role of healthcare professionals outside of specialist palliative care in end-of-life care discussions and decision-making.

摘要

背景

专科姑息治疗领域的医护人员在与患者及其家庭护理人员进行临终关怀讨论方面发挥着关键作用。我们旨在确定专科姑息治疗领域的医护人员在支持患者及其家庭护理人员进行患者临终关怀决策时面临的主要障碍和促进因素。

方法

从爱尔兰一个大型地区专科姑息治疗服务机构(包括2个临终关怀场所)招募了22名来自不同医疗专业的医护人员。与参与者进行了5次焦点小组讨论。数据进行了成员核对,并采用主题分析法进行分析。

结果

与患者及家庭护理人员进行开放的沟通和建立信任关系,以及有足够时间对患者的临终关怀偏好进行早期和分阶段的探索,是参与者的关键促进因素。参与者认为,家庭护理人员向患者隐瞒信息、家庭对谁负责决策存在误解,以及其他专科在临终关怀讨论中缺乏参与是主要障碍。尽管参与者表示他们有足够的专业知识来支持患者进行临终关怀决策,但他们认为临终关怀讨论并非专科姑息治疗服务机构的唯一责任。

结论

在临终关怀决策中与患者进行开放的沟通对专科姑息治疗领域的医护人员可能至关重要。需要进一步研究以了解专科姑息治疗领域以外的医护人员在临终关怀讨论和决策中的作用。

相似文献

1
Healthcare Professionals' Perspective on Supporting Patients and Family Caregivers in End-Of-Life Care Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study in Specialist Palliative Care.医疗保健专业人员对在临终护理决策中支持患者及家庭照顾者的看法:一项专科姑息治疗的定性研究
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Nov 1:10499091241296860. doi: 10.1177/10499091241296860.
2
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
5
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
8
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
9
Early palliative interventions for improving outcomes in people with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers.早期姑息治疗干预对改善原发性脑恶性肿瘤患者及其照护者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013440.pub2.
10
Perceptions and Needs of Stakeholders Regarding MyPal Project's Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App: Cross-Sectional Qualitative Focus Group Study.利益相关者对MyPal项目电子患者报告结局应用程序的认知与需求:横断面定性焦点小组研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Aug 13;11:e57388. doi: 10.2196/57388.

本文引用的文献

1
How do Patients With Advanced Cancer and Family Caregivers Accommodate One Another in Decision-Making? Findings From a Qualitative Study in Specialist Palliative Care.晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者在决策过程中如何相互适应?一项专科姑息治疗定性研究的结果
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 May;42(5):452-458. doi: 10.1177/10499091241255117. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Barriers and facilitators that hospital clinicians perceive to discuss the personal values, wishes, and needs of patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review.医院临床医生在姑息治疗中讨论患者个人价值观、愿望和需求时所感知到的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法的系统评价
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Dec 1;17:26323524231212510. doi: 10.1177/26323524231212510. eCollection 2023.
3
Mutual support between patients and family caregivers in palliative care: A qualitative study.姑息治疗中患者和家庭照护者之间的相互支持:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1520-1528. doi: 10.1177/02692163231205130. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
Effective communication in palliative care from the perspectives of patients and relatives: A systematic review.从患者和家属的角度看姑息治疗中的有效沟通:系统综述。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Oct;21(5):890-913. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523001165.
5
Information concealment in palliative patients: Development and pilot study of a new scale for caregivers.姑息治疗患者的信息隐瞒: caregiver 新量表的制定与初步研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4504-e4512. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13854. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
6
Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance-systematic review and narrative synthesis.姑息治疗中的决策制定:患者和家庭照护者的一致性和不一致性——系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Dec;13(4):374-385. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003525. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
7
Decision-Support Needs of Caregivers Considering Hospice Enrollment for a Family Member With Dementia.考虑让患有痴呆症的家庭成员接受临终关怀的护理人员的决策支持需求。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Jul;39(7):812-821. doi: 10.1177/10499091211056035. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
8
Caregiver experience with decision-making difficulties in end-of-life care for patients with cardiovascular diseases.照顾者在心血管疾病患者临终关怀决策困难方面的体验。
J Cardiol. 2022 Apr;79(4):537-544. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
9
Patients' preferences and factors influencing initial advance care planning discussions' timing: A cross-cultural mixed-methods study.患者偏好及影响预先护理计划初始讨论时机的因素:一项跨文化混合方法研究。
Palliat Med. 2020 Jul;34(7):906-916. doi: 10.1177/0269216320914791. Epub 2020 May 1.
10
General practitioners (GPs) and end-of-life care: a qualitative study of Australian GPs and specialist palliative care clinicians.全科医生与临终关怀:一项针对澳大利亚全科医生和专科姑息治疗临床医生的定性研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Nov 1. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001531.